Geraldine O’Neill

Prof. Geraldine O’Neill


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TGThomas James Grundy
Thomas James Grundy
ELEllen De Leon
Ellen De Leon
KGKaitlyn Rose Griffin
Kaitlyn Rose Griffin
BSBrett Stringer
Brett Stringer
BDBryan William Day
Bryan William Day
GOGeraldine O’Neill
Geraldine O’Neill
The ability of cancer cells to sense external mechanical forces has emerged as a significant factor in the promotion of cancer invasion. Currently there are conflicting reports in the literature with regard to whether glioblastoma (GBM) brain cancer cell migration and invasion is rigidity-sensitive. In order to address this question we have compared the rigidity-response of primary patient-derived GBM lines. Cells were plated on polyacrylamide gels of defined rigidity that reflect the diversity of the brain tissue mechanical environment and cell morphology and migration were analysed by time-lapse microscopy. Invasiveness was assessed in multicellular spheroids embedded in 3D matrigel cultures. Our data reveal a range of rigidity-dependent responses between the patient-derived cell lines, from reduced migration on the most compliant tissue stiffness to those that are insensitive to substrate rigidity and are equally migratory irrespective of the underlying substrate stiffness. Notably, the rigidity-insensitive GBM cells show the greatest invasive capacity in soft 3D matrigel cultures. Collectively our data confirm both rigidity-dependent and independent behaviour in primary GBM patient-derived cells.

1 November 2005 in Molecular Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dinny GrahamDinny Graham
Dinny Graham
MYMelissa L. Yager
Melissa L. Yager
HHHazel D. Hill
Hazel D. Hill
KBKaren Byth
Karen Byth
GOGeraldine O’Neill
Geraldine O’Neill
CCChristine L. Clarke
Christine L. Clarke
The ovarian hormone progesterone is essential for normal breast development and function. However, it is also implicated in breast cancer development. Progesterone signals through two nuclear receptors [progesterone receptor A (PRA) and progesterone receptor B (PRB)], which display striking differences in transcriptional activity when analyzed separately. The two species are coexpressed equally in normal breast, but expression becomes markedly disrupted in breast cancer, where a predominance of PRA is common. To determine the impact on PR transcriptional activity of the shift from coexpression of PRA and PRB, observed in normal cells, to predominance of PRA, common in cancers, we modeled these changes in PR expression patterns using an inducible model of PRA predominance. At short treatment times progestin regulation was directed toward transcriptional modulators, whereas longer exposure more frequently targeted genes associated with regulation of cell shape, adhesion, and metabolism, and a number of these targets acquired responsiveness only when PRA predominance was achieved. Consistent with this, overexpression of PRA altered progestin effects on cell-substrate attachment and focal adhesion signaling. Our data suggest that disrupted balance of PRA and PRB remodels progestin responsiveness and that altered regulation of morphology and adhesion are important components of altered progestin response in breast cancer.

11 April 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJessie Zhong
Jessie Zhong
JBJaime B. Baquiran
Jaime B. Baquiran
NBNavid Bonakdar
Navid Bonakdar
JLJustin Lees
Justin Lees
YCYu Wooi Ching
Yu Wooi Ching
GOGeraldine O’Neill
Geraldine O’Neill
The speed of cell migration on 2-dimensional (2D) surfaces is determined by the rate of assembly and disassembly of clustered integrin receptors known as focal adhesions. Different modes of cell migration that have been described in 3D environments are distinguished by their dependence on integrin-mediated interactions with the extra-cellular matrix. In particular, the mesenchymal invasion mode is the most dependent on focal adhesion dynamics. The focal adhesion protein NEDD9 is a key signalling intermediary in mesenchymal cell migration, however whether NEDD9 plays a role in regulating focal adhesion dynamics has not previously been reported. As NEDD9 effects on 2D migration speed appear to depend on the cell type examined, in the present study we have used mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) from mice in which the NEDD9 gene has been depleted (NEDD9 −/− MEFs). This allows comparison with effects of other focal adhesion proteins that have previously been demonstrated using MEFs. We show that focal adhesion disassembly rates are increased in the absence of NEDD9 expression and this is correlated with increased paxillin phosphorylation at focal adhesions. NEDD9−/− MEFs have increased rates of migration on 2D surfaces, but conversely, migration of these cells is significantly reduced in 3D collagen gels. Importantly we show that myosin light chain kinase is activated in 3D in the absence of NEDD9 and is conversely inhibited in 2D cultures. Measurement of adhesion strength reveals that NEDD9−/− MEFs have decreased adhesion to fibronectin, despite upregulated α5β1 fibronectin receptor expression. We find that β1 integrin activation is significantly suppressed in the NEDD9−/−, suggesting that in the absence of NEDD9 there is decreased integrin receptor activation. Collectively our data suggest that NEDD9 may promote 3D cell migration by slowing focal adhesion disassembly, promoting integrin receptor activation and increasing adhesion force to the ECM.

1 May 2013 in Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJustin G. Lees
Justin G. Lees
YCYu Wooi Ching
Yu Wooi Ching
DADamian H. Adams
Damian H. Adams
CBCuc T.T. Bach
Cuc T.T. Bach
MSMichael Samuel
Michael Samuel
GOGeraldine O’Neill
Geraldine O’Neill

1 December 2020 in Journal of Cell Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFarhana A. Sarker
Farhana A. Sarker
VPVictoria G. Prior
Victoria G. Prior
SBSamuel Bax
Samuel Bax
GOGeraldine O’Neill
Geraldine O’Neill
Research throughout the 90s established that integrin crosstalk with growth factor receptors stimulates robust growth factor signaling. These insights were derived chiefly from comparing adherent versus suspension cell cultures. Considering the new understanding that mechanosensory inputs tune adhesion signaling, it is now timely to revisit this crosstalk in different mechanical environments. Here, we present a brief historical perspective on integrin signaling against the backdrop of the mechanically diverse extracellular microenvironment, then review the evidence supporting the mechanical regulation of integrin crosstalk with growth factor signaling. We discuss early studies revealing distinct signaling consequences for integrin occupancy (binding to matrix) and aggregation (binding to immobile ligand). We consider how the mechanical environments encountered in vivo intersect with this diverse signaling, focusing on receptor endocytosis. We discuss the implications of mechanically tuned integrin signaling for growth factor signaling, using the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as an illustrative example. We discuss how the use of rigid tissue culture plastic for cancer drug screening may select agents that lack efficacy in the soft in vivo tissue environment. Tuning of integrin signaling via external mechanical forces in vivo and subsequent effects on growth factor signaling thus has implications for normal cellular physiology and anti-cancer therapies.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LOLouise Orcheston-Findlay
Louise Orcheston-Findlay
SBSamuel Bax
Samuel Bax
RURobert Utama
Robert Utama
MEMartin Engel
Martin Engel
DGDinisha Govender
Dinisha Govender
GOGeraldine O’Neill
Geraldine O’Neill
The life expectancy of patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) has not improved in decades. One of the crucial tools to enable future improvement is advanced models that faithfully recapitulate the tumour microenvironment; they can be used for high-throughput screening that in future may enable accurate personalised drug screens. Currently, advanced models are crucial for identifying and understanding potential new targets, assessing new chemotherapeutic compounds or other treatment modalities. Recently, various methodologies have come into use that have allowed the validation of complex models—namely, spheroids, tumouroids, hydrogel-embedded cultures (matrix-supported) and advanced bioengineered cultures assembled with bioprinting and microfluidics. This review is designed to present the state of advanced models of HGG, whilst focusing as much as is possible on the paediatric form of the disease. The reality remains, however, that paediatric HGG (pHGG) models are years behind those of adult HGG. Our goal is to bring this to light in the hope that pGBM models can be improved upon.