Growing genetic and pathological evidence has identified microglial dysfunction as a key contributor to the pathogenesis and progression of various neurological disorders, positioning microglia replacement as a promising therapeutic strategy. Traditional bone marrow transplantation (BMT) methods for replenishing brain microglia have limitations, including low efficiency and the potential for brain injury because of preconditioning regimens, such as irradiation or chemotherapy. Moreover, BM-derived cells that migrate to the brain do not recapitulate the phenotypic and functional properties of resident microglia. Here, we present a microglia transplantation strategy devoid of any conditioning, termed “tricyclic microglial depletion for transplantation” (TCMDT). This approach leverages three cycles of microglial depletion using the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitor PLX3397, creating an optimal window for efficient engraftment of exogenous microglia. Transplantation of primary cultured microglia by TCMDT successfully restored the identity and functions of endogenous microglia. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of TCMDT, we applied this strategy to two distinct mouse models of neurologic disorder. In a Sandhoff disease model, a neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorder caused by hexosaminidase subunit beta ( Hexb ) deficiency, TCMDT effectively replaced deficient microglia, attenuating neurodegeneration and improving motor performance. Similarly, in an Alzheimer’s disease (AD)–related amyloid mouse model carrying the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (Trem2) R47H mutation, our transplantation strategy rescued microglial dysfunction and mitigated AD-related pathology. Overall, our study introduces TCMDT as a practical, efficient, and safe approach for microglia replacement, suggesting therapeutic potential for treating neurological disorders associated with microglial dysfunction.

The WW domain is composed of 38 to 40 semi-conserved amino acids shared with structural, regulatory, and signaling proteins. WW domain-binding protein 2 (WBP2), as a binding partner of WW domain protein, interacts with several WW-domain-containing proteins, such as Yes kinase-associated protein (Yap), paired box gene 8 (Pax8), WW-domain-containing transcription regulator protein 1 (TAZ), and WW-domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) through its PPxY motifs within C-terminal region, and further triggers the downstream signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Studies have confirmed that phosphorylated form of WBP2 can move into nuclei and activate the transcription of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), whose expression were the indicators of breast cancer development, indicating that WBP2 may participate in the progression of breast cancer. Both overexpression of WBP2 and activation of tyrosine phosphorylation upregulate the signal cascades in the cross-regulation of the Wnt and ER signaling pathways in breast cancer. Following the binding of WBP2 to the WW domain region of TAZ which can accelerate migration, invasion and is required for the transformed phenotypes of breast cancer cells, the transformation of epithelial to mesenchymal of MCF10A is activated, suggesting that WBP2 is a key player in regulating cell migration. When WBP2 binds with WWOX, a tumor suppressor, ER transactivation and tumor growth can be suppressed. Thus, WBP2 may serve as a molecular on/off switch that controls the crosstalk between E2, WWOX, Wnt, TAZ, and other oncogenic signaling pathways. This review interprets the relationship between WBP2 and breast cancer, and provides comprehensive views about the function of WBP2 in the regulation of the pathogenesis of breast cancer and endocrine therapy in breast cancer treatment.

Background: Integrin subunit α 8 (ITGA8) methylation has been associated with the development of several cancers, but its contribution to breast cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the methylation status of ITGA8, and the underlying regulatory mechanisms of ITGA8 methylation in breast cancer. Methods: ITGA8 expression was investigated using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) database and the Breast Cancer Gene-Expression Miner v.4.4 (bc-GenExMiner v4.4). The association between ITGA8 expression levels and the survival rate of breast cancer patients was evaluated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and Gene Expression-based Outcome for Breast Cancer Online (GOBO): Gene Set Analysis. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) was used to detect the methylation of ITGA8. Protein level of ITGA8 was determined by Western blot analysis. Results: ITGA8 was expressed at low levels in human breast cancer cells compared to non-tumorigenic breast cells and breast tissue, and was upregulated in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tissue compared with ER-negative tissue (P<0.01). ITGA8 gene expression was negatively associated with breast tumor stage and survival rate in all breast cancer patients. However, ER-positive patients with low ITGA8 expression showed poorer distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates than patients with high ITGA8 expression. This was not observed in the ER-negative population. Mechanistically speaking, hypermethylation of ITGA8 was discovered in ER-positive breast cancer cells. Administration of the methylation inhibitor, 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC), significantly elevated protein expression of ITGA8 in ER-positive breast cancer cells compared to ER-negative cells. The positive association between ITGA8 status and methylation was also observed in clinical tissue specimens. When treated with 17-beta-estradiol, an antagonist of ERα, 5-aza-dC-induced upregulation of ITGA8 in ER-positive breast cancer cells was no longer observed. Conclusions: Low ITGA8 expression in ER-positive breast cancer might be caused by the hypermethylation of ITGA8, a process dependent on ERα. Our findings provide an important foundation for investigations into ITGA8-targeted treatment strategies for ER-positive breast cancer.

Background: CD74 is ectopically expressed in many tumors and can regulate tumor immunity. However, there are many gaps in the study of the prognostic value of CD74 expression and immune infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: An online tumor database was searched to obtain data on gene/protein expression. Immune infiltration analysis was performed using the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource and Comprehensive Analysis on Multi-Omics of Immunotherapy in Pan-cancer databases. Single-cell data were obtained from the Tissue-specific Gene Expression and Regulation, Single-cell Transcriptomes of Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Tumor Immune Single-cell Hub 2 databases.Results: CD74 was highly expressed in HCC patients. HCC patients with high CD74 expression who consumed alcohol or were negative for hepatitis virus had a better prognosis than patients with low CD74 expression. CD74 was mainly enriched in immune response regulation pathways. Both copy number variations in CD74 and CD74 expression patterns affected the infiltration levels of immune cells. Interestingly, CD74 regulated the differentiation of myeloid cells. CD74 in macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) forms complex networks with malignant cells and hepatic progenitor cell (HPC)-like cells, respectively. High CD74 expression in HPC-like cells and malignant cells significantly decreased the fraction of C-type lectin domain family 9 A (CLEC9A)-cDC1⁺DCs and IL-1B⁺macrophages, respectively. Their crosstalk subsequently shaped the tumor microenvironment of HCC, possibly through the CD74-MIF axis. Importantly, patients with high CD74 expression presented higher immune scores and achieved good outcomes after receiving immunotherapy.Conclusion: High CD74 expression is associated with the abundance of a variety of immune cell types, mediating interactions among tumor and immune cells and shaping the malignant behavior of HCC. In summary, CD74 may be a hallmark for determining the prognosis and immune cell infiltration levels of HCC patients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive receptor LILRB1 regulates tumors progression by transducing immune inhibitory signals via intracellular immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs. However, its role in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) remains vague.