Catherine Heaney

Prof. Catherine Heaney

Stanford Prevention Research Center, Standford School of Medicine
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 September 2009 in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAnnekatrin Hoppe
Annekatrin Hoppe
Catherine HeaneyCatherine Heaney
Catherine Heaney
KFKaori Fujishiro
Kaori Fujishiro


20 October 2014 in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSharon Toker
Sharon Toker
Catherine HeaneyCatherine Heaney
Catherine Heaney
DEDanit Ein-Gar
Danit Ein-Gar
Research suggests that worksite health promotion (WHP) programmes, and specifically health risk assessment (HRA) surveys and health education workshops, can be effective in enhancing employees’ health. However, 50–75% of employees choose not to participate when offered the opportunity to do so. The reasons for nonparticipation and the characteristics of nonparticipants have largely been overlooked. Building on premises of Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we hypothesize that nonparticipation results from lack or loss of resources, or from the perceived low value of resources. These barriers to participation are expected to be related to employees’ characteristics and beliefs (termed implicit barriers) and reflected in employees’ self-reported reasons for nonparticipation (termed explicit barriers). We surveyed a large random sample of participants and nonparticipants in a WHP programme (n = 1926 employees), which included two steps: a HRA survey and a health education workshop. Participants completed an anonymous web-based questionnaire. Implicit and explicit barriers that reflect resource availability (e.g., age, health status) and valuation (e.g., low value of making a lifestyle change) were identified. The magnitude and nature of these barriers differed between the HRA survey and the workshop. We discuss how future research on WHP programmes can build on these findings and propose practical implications for reducing nonparticipation.

TRTia Rich
Tia Rich
Benjamin ChrisingerBenjamin Chrisinger
Benjamin Chrisinger
RKRajani Kaimal
Rajani Kaimal
SWSandra Winter
Sandra Winter
HHHaley Hedlin
Haley Hedlin
Catherine HeaneyCatherine Heaney
Catherine Heaney
Positive associations between well-being and a single contemplative practice (e.g., mindfulness meditation) are well documented, yet prior work may have underestimated the strength of the association by omitting consideration of multiple and/or alternative contemplative practices. Moreover, little is known about how contemplative practice behavior (CPB) impacts different dimensions of well-being. This study investigates the relationship of CPB, consisting of four discrete practices (embodied somatic-observing, non-reactive mindfulness, self-compassion, and compassion for others), with multiple dimensions of well-being. As with other canonical lifestyle behaviors, multiple contemplative practices can be integrated into one’s daily routine. Thus, it is critical to holistically consider these behaviors, extending them beyond a simple uni-dimensional measure (e.g., daily mindfulness meditation practice). We developed an integrative measure of four types of contemplative practice and found it to be significantly associated with a multi-dimensional measure of well-being. Importantly, our findings were from three large global multi-regional cohorts and compared against better-understood lifestyle behaviors (physical activity). Data were drawn from California/San Francisco Bay Area, (n = 6442), Hangzhou City (n = 10,268), and New Taipei City (n = 3033). In all three cohorts, we found statistically significant (p < 0.05) positive associations between CPB and well-being, both overall and with all of the constituent domains of well-being, comparable to or stronger than the relationship with physical activity across most well-being outcomes. These findings provide robust and cross-cultural evidence for a positive association between CPB and well-being, illuminate dimensions of well-being that could be most influenced by CPB, and suggest CPB may be useful to include as part of fundamental lifestyle recommendations for health and well-being.

1 February 2012 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSue A. Ferguson
Sue A. Ferguson
W. Gary AllreadW. Gary Allread
W. Gary Allread
DBDeborah L. Burr
Deborah L. Burr
Catherine HeaneyCatherine Heaney
Catherine Heaney
WMWilliam S. Marras
William S. Marras

16 April 2014 in Health Education Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGA. H. Grummon
A. H. Grummon
Catherine HeaneyCatherine Heaney
Catherine Heaney
WDW. A. Dellinger
W. A. Dellinger
JWJ. R. Wilkins
J. R. Wilkins
The operation of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) by youth has contributed to the incidence of serious and fatal injuries among children. This study explored factors related to the frequency with which youth wore a helmet and refrained from engaging in three risky driving behaviors (driving at risky speeds, on paved roads and on unfamiliar terrain) while operating an ATV. Youth (n = 248) aged 9–14 from central Ohio and one of their parents completed self-report measures of ATV safety behaviors, youth general propensity for risk taking, protection motivation and parental behaviors to facilitate youth safety. Data from two focus groups provided insight on quantitative results. Analyses revealed considerable variation in the frequency with which youth performed the safety behaviors, with 13- and 14-year-olds reporting less frequent safe behavior than 9- to 12-year-olds. Multiple regression analyses suggested that parental behaviors, such as providing reminders to wear a helmet, were associated with more frequent helmet use but were not associated with risky driving behaviors. Youth’s general propensity toward risk taking was not associated with helmet use and only associated with riskydriving behaviors among the 13- and 14-year-olds. Self-efficacy was an important predictor across both age groups and behaviors. Implications for injury prevention are discussed.