Bettina Eichler-Löbermann

Prof. Dr. Bettina Eichler-Löbermann

Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2021 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gebeyanesh Worku ZerssaGebeyanesh Worku Zerssa
Gebeyanesh Worku Zerssa
HDHunde Debela
Hunde Debela
DKDong-Gill Kim
Dong-Gill Kim
Bettina Eichler-LöbermannBettina Eichler-Löbermann
Bettina Eichler-Löbermann
Agriculture is the backbone of the Ethiopian economy, and the agricultural sector is dominated by smallholder farming systems. The farming systems are facing constraints such as small land size, lack of resources, and increasing degradation of soil quality that hamper sustainable crop production and food security. The effects of climate change (e.g., frequent occurrence of extreme weather events) exacerbate these problems. Applying appropriate technologies like climate-smart agriculture (CSA) can help to resolve the constraints of smallholder farming systems. This paper provides a comprehensive overview regarding opportunities and challenges of traditional and newly developed CSA practices in Ethiopia, such as integrated soil fertility management, water harvesting, and agroforestry. These practices are commonly related to drought resilience, stability of crop yields, carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas mitigation, and higher household income. However, the adoption of the practices by smallholder farmers is often limited, mainly due to shortage of cropland, land tenure issues, lack of adequate knowledge about CSA, slow return on investments, and insufficient policy and implementation schemes. It is suggested that additional measures be developed and made available to help CSA practices become more prevalent in smallholder farming systems. The measures should include the utilization of degraded and marginal lands, improvement of the soil organic matter management, provision of capacity-building opportunities and financial support, as well as the development of specific policies for smallholder farming.

9 May 2015 in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NVNikolay Vassilev
Nikolay Vassilev
MVM. Vassileva
M. Vassileva
ALA. Lopez
A. Lopez
VMV. Martos
V. Martos
ARA. Reyes
A. Reyes
Eligio MalusaEligio Malusa
Eligio Malusa

12 March 2010 in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKatja Schiemenz
Katja Schiemenz
Bettina Eichler-LöbermannBettina Eichler-Löbermann
Bettina Eichler-Löbermann
The reutilization of biomass ashes in agriculture is an important issue to create nutrient cycles and to save fertilizer. To analyse the P fertilization effect of crop biomass ashes (rape meal ash (RMA), straw ash (SA), and cereal ash (CA)) in interaction with different crops, two pot experiments with a poor loamy sand deficient in P were carried out. Besides the three ash treatments, other treatments included triple superphosphate (TSP) as a high soluble P source, potassium chloride (KCl) as a high soluble K source, and a control (CON) without P and K. The main crops (maize, lupin, summer barley, and oilseed rape) were cultivated in the first experiment from April to May and the catch crops (oil radish, phacelia, italian ryegrass, and buckwheat) were cultivated in the second experiment from August to September. Plant parameters (biomass and P uptake of shoots), soil pH, different P pools of the soil (total P (Pt), water soluble P (Pw), double lactate soluble P (Pdl), oxalate soluble P (Pox)), P sorption capacity (PSC), and the degree of P saturation (DPS) were investigated. The fertilization effect of biomass ashes was comparable with that of TSP. On average of all crops, the highest P uptake (86.7 mg pot−1) was found after RMA application, and the lowest P uptake (66.6 mg pot−1) for CON. The readily bio-available soil P contents (Pw and Pdl) were significantly increased when P was supplied, regardless of whether P was given with ash or with high soluble TSP. The P fertilization effects also depended on the cultivated crops. The ash treatments resulted in highest increases of soil Pw values when combined with buckwheat cultivation. After buckwheat harvest the Pw content in the control was 8.0 mg kg−1, and in the ash treatments between 13.9 mg kg−1 (CA) and 15.7 mg kg−1 (RMA). From the results of this study we conclude, that crop biomass ashes can be an adequate P source comparable to that of highly soluble commercial P fertilizer.

1 April 2018 in Geoderma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMaximilian Koch
Maximilian Koch
JKJens Kruse
Jens Kruse
Bettina Eichler-LöbermannBettina Eichler-Löbermann
Bettina Eichler-Löbermann
DZDana Zimmer
Dana Zimmer
SWSabine Willbold
Sabine Willbold
NSNina Siebers
Nina Siebers

23 October 2017 in European Journal of Soil Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNS. Nawara
S. Nawara
TDT. Van Dael
T. Van Dael
RMRoel Merckx
Roel Merckx
FAF. Amery
F. Amery
AEA. Elsen
A. Elsen
ESErik Smolders
Erik Smolders
Summary: Most soil tests for available phosphorus (P) perform rather poorly in predicting crop response. This study was set up to compare different established soil tests in their capacity to predict crop response across contrasting types of soil. Soil samples from long‐term field experiments, the oldest >100 years old, were collected in five European countries. The total number of soil samples ( n = 218), which differed in cropping and P treatment, and originated from 11 different soil types, were analysed with five tests: ammonium oxalate (Ox), ammonium lactate (AL), Olsen P, 0.01 m CaCl 2 and the diffusive gradient in thin film (DGT). The first three tests denote available P quantity (Q), whereas the last two indicate P intensity (I) of the soil solution. All five tests were positively related to the crop yield data ( n = 317). The Q‐tests generally outperformed I‐tests when evaluated with goodness of fit in Mitscherlich models, but critical P values of the I‐tests varied the least among different types of soil. No test was clearly superior to the others, except for the oxalate extraction, which was generally poor. The combination of Q‐ and I‐tests performed slightly better for predicting crop yield than any single soil P test. This Q + I analysis explains why recent successes with I‐tests (e.g. DGT) were found for soils with larger P sorption than for those in the present study. This systematic evaluation of soil tests using a unique compilation of established field trials provides critical soil P values that are valid across Europe. Highlights: We compared soil P tests for predicting crop response across contrasting soil types. No test was clearly superior to the others except for the oxalate extraction, which was generally poor. This study suggests that intensity tests do not perform markedly better than quantity tests. The evaluation of soil P tests on this unique dataset provided critical soil P values across Europe.

20 November 2017 in AMBIO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peter LeinweberPeter Leinweber
Peter Leinweber
UBUlrich Bathmann
Ulrich Bathmann
UBUwe Buczko
Uwe Buczko
CDCaroline Douhaire
Caroline Douhaire
Bettina Eichler-LöbermannBettina Eichler-Löbermann
Bettina Eichler-Löbermann
Jens TräncknerJens Tränckner
Jens Tränckner
This special issue of Ambio compiles a series of contributions made at the 8th International Phosphorus Workshop (IPW8), held in September 2016 in Rostock, Germany. The introducing overview article summarizes major published scientific findings in the time period from IPW7 (2015) until recently, including presentations from IPW8. The P issue was subdivided into four themes along the logical sequence of P utilization in production, environmental, and societal systems: (1) Sufficiency and efficiency of P utilization, especially in animal husbandry and crop production; (2) P recycling: technologies and product applications; (3) P fluxes and cycling in the environment; and (4) P governance. The latter two themes had separate sessions for the first time in the International Phosphorus Workshops series; thus, this overview presents a scene-setting rather than an overview of the latest research for these themes. In summary, this paper details new findings in agricultural and environmental P research, which indicate reduced P inputs, improved management options, and provide translations into governance options for a more sustainable P use.