ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS

Prof. Dr. ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2017 in Parasitology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
NJNicholas Jonsson
Nicholas Jonsson
CBChandra Bhushan
Chandra Bhushan
Infestations with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, constitute the most important ectoparasite problem for cattle production in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide, resulting in major economic losses. The control of R. microplus is mostly based on the use of conventional acaricides and macrocyclic lactones. However, the intensive use of such compounds has resulted in tick populations that exhibit resistance to all major acaricide chemical classes. Consequently, there is a need for the development of alternative approaches, possibly including the use of animal husbandry practices, synergized pesticides, rotation of acaricides, pesticide mixture formulations, manual removal of ticks, selection for host resistance, nutritional management, release of sterile male hybrids, environmental management, plant species that are unfavourable to ticks, pasture management, plant extracts, essential oils and vaccination. Integrated tick management consists of the systematic combination of at least two control technologies aiming to reduce selection pressure in favour of acaricide-resistant individuals, while maintaining adequate levels of animal production. The purpose of this paper is to present a current review on conventional acaricide and macrocyclic lactone resistance for better understanding and control of resistant ticks with particular emphasis on R. microplus on cattle.

1 January 2017 in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
LGLaerte Grisi
Laerte Grisi
ALAdalberto Angel Pérez de León
Adalberto Angel Pérez de León
HVHumberto Silva Villela
Humberto Silva Villela
Juan Felipe de Jesús Torres-AcostaJuan Felipe de Jesús Torres-Acosta
Juan Felipe de Jesús Torres-Acosta
DCDionisio García Carrasco
Dionisio García Carrasco
Here, economic losses caused by cattle parasites in Mexico were estimated on an annual basis. The main factors taken into consideration for this assessment included the total number of animals at risk, potential detrimental effects of parasitism on milk production or weight gain, and records of condemnation on livestock byproducts. Estimates in US dollars (US$) were based on reported yield losses in untreated animals. These estimates reflect the major effects on cattle productivity of six parasites, or parasite group. The potential economic impact (US$ millions) was: gastrointestinal nematodes US$ 445.10; coccidia (Eimeria spp.) US$ 23.78; liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) US$ 130.91; cattle tick (Rhipicephalus microplus) US$ 573.61; horn fly (Haematobia irritans) US$ 231.67; and stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans) US$ 6.79. Overall, the yearly economic loss due to the six major parasites of cattle in Mexico was estimated to be US$ 1.41 billion. Considering that the national cattle herd registered in 2013 included 32.40 million head, the estimated yearly loss per head was US$ 43.57. The limitations of some of the baseline studies used to develop these estimates, particularly when extrapolated from local situations to a national scale, are acknowledged. However, the general picture obtained from the present effort demonstrates the magnitude and importance of cattle parasitism in Mexico and the challenges to maximize profitability by the livestock industry without adapting sustainable and integrated parasite control strategies.

1 February 2012 in Veterinary Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFA. Fernández-Salas
A. Fernández-Salas
RRROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
MAM.A. Alonso-Díaz
M.A. Alonso-Díaz

1 March 2006 in Veterinary Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
MAM.A. Alonso-Díaz
M.A. Alonso-Díaz
FRF. Rodríguez-Arevalo
F. Rodríguez-Arevalo
HFH. Fragoso-Sanchez
H. Fragoso-Sanchez
VSV.M. Santamaria
V.M. Santamaria
Rodrigo Rosario-CruzRodrigo Rosario-Cruz
Rodrigo Rosario-Cruz

1 January 2016 in Veterinary Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
DAD.A. Apanaskevich
D.A. Apanaskevich
MOM.M Ojeda-Chi
M.M Ojeda-Chi
ITI. Trinidad-Martínez
I. Trinidad-Martínez
EREnrique Reyes-Novelo
Enrique Reyes-Novelo
ALA.A. Pérez de León
A.A. Pérez de León

1 February 2010 in Veterinary Parasitology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPL.C. Perez-Cogollo
L.C. Perez-Cogollo
RRROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
ROGER IVAN RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS
GRG.T. Ramirez-Cruz
G.T. Ramirez-Cruz
RMR.J. Miller
R.J. Miller