Pascaline Pey

Pascaline Pey


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2013 in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGabriela S. Seiler
Gabriela S. Seiler
JBJames C. Brown
James C. Brown
JRJennifer A. Reetz
Jennifer A. Reetz
OTOlivier Taeymans
Olivier Taeymans
MBMelissa Bucknoff
Melissa Bucknoff
LGLorrie Gaschen
Lorrie Gaschen
Objective—To determine the incidence of adverse events within 24 hours after contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in dogs and cats and compare the risk of death within 24 hours after imaging for animals that underwent ultrasonography with and without injection of a contrast agent. Design—Retrospective case-control study. Animals—750 animals (411 case dogs, 238 control dogs, 77 case cats, and 24 control cats). Procedures—At 11 institutions, medical records were reviewed of dogs and cats that had CEUS performed (cases) as were medical records of dogs and cats with clinical signs similar to those of case animals that had ultrasonography performed without injection of a contrast agent (controls). Information regarding signalment; preexisting disease; type, dose, and administration route of contrast agent used; immediate (within 1 hour after CEUS) and delayed (> 1 and ≤ 24 hours after CEUS) adverse events; and occurrence and cause of death (when available) was extracted from each medical record. Risk of death within 24 hours after ultrasonography was compared between case and control animals. Results—Of the 411 case dogs, 3 had immediate adverse events (vomiting or syncope) and 1 had a delayed adverse event (vomiting). No adverse events were recorded for case cats. Twenty-three of 357 (6.4%) clinically ill case animals and 14 of 262 (5.3%) clinically ill control animals died within 24 hours after ultrasonography; risk of death did not differ between cases and controls. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that CEUS was safe in dogs and cats.

12 December 2012 in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAnaïs Combes
Anaïs Combes
PPPascaline Pey
Pascaline Pey
DPDominique Paepe
Dominique Paepe
DRDan Rosenberg
Dan Rosenberg
SDSylvie Daminet
Sylvie Daminet
JSJimmy H Saunders
Jimmy H Saunders
The first part of the study aimed to describe prospectively the ultrasonographic features of the adrenal glands in 94 healthy cats and 51 chronically sick cats. It confirmed the feasibility of ultrasonography of adrenal glands in healthy and chronically sick cats, which were not statistically different. The typical hypoechoic appearance of the gland surrounded by hyperechoic fat made it recognisable. A sagittal plane of the gland, not in line with the aorta, may be necessary to obtain the largest adrenal measurements. The reference intervals of adrenal measurements were inferred from the values obtained in the healthy and chronically sick cats (mean ± 0.96 SD): adrenal length was 8.9–12.5 mm; cranial height was 3.0–4.8 mm; caudal height was 3.0–4.5 mm. The second part of the study consisted of a retrospective analysis of the ultrasonographic examination of the adrenal glands in cats with adrenal diseases (six had hyperaldosteronism and four had pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism) and a descriptive comparison with the reference features obtained in the control groups from the prospective study. Cats with hyperaldosteronism presented with unilateral severely enlarged adrenal glands. However, a normal contralateral gland did not preclude a contralateral infiltration in benign or malignant adrenal neoplasms. The ultrasonographic appearance of the adrenal glands could not differentiate benign and malignant lesions. The ultrasonographic appearance of pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism was mainly a symmetrical adrenal enlargement; however, a substantial number of cases were within the reference intervals of adrenal size.

4 November 2010 in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VBVirginie Barberet
Virginie Barberet
PPPascaline Pey
Pascaline Pey
LDLuc Duchateau
Luc Duchateau
ACAnais Combes
Anais Combes
SDSylvie Daminet
Sylvie Daminet
JSJimmy H. Saunders
Jimmy H. Saunders

26 April 2011 in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPascaline Pey
Pascaline Pey
Massimo VignoliMassimo Vignoli
Massimo Vignoli
HHHendrik Haers
Hendrik Haers
LDLuc Duchateau
Luc Duchateau
FRFederica Rossi
Federica Rossi
JSJimmy H. Saunders
Jimmy H. Saunders

1 November 2019 in The Veterinary Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRocío Fernández-Parra
Rocío Fernández-Parra
PPPascaline Pey
Pascaline Pey
LZL. Zilberstein
L. Zilberstein
MMM. Malvè
M. Malvè

27 October 2016 in Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSwan Specchi
Swan Specchi
EAEdoardo Auriemma
Edoardo Auriemma
SMSimona Morabito
Simona Morabito
FFFilippo Ferri
Filippo Ferri
EZEric Zini
Eric Zini
FRFederica Rossi
Federica Rossi