Anna Kluzik

Dr. Anna Kluzik

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Therapy and Pain Treatment, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Medical Science Monitor
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LDLeon Drobnik
Leon Drobnik
WPWłodzimierz Płotek
Włodzimierz Płotek
WŁWojciech Łyskawa
Wojciech Łyskawa
AKAnna Kluzik
Anna Kluzik
MGMałgorzata Grześkowiak
Małgorzata Grześkowiak
ZŻZbigniew Żaba
Zbigniew Żaba
Background:Human cognitive functioning can be assessed using different methods of testing. Age, level of education, and gender may influence the results of cognitive tests. Material and Methods:The well-known Trail Making Test (TMT), which is often u...

13 October 2016 in European journal of pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSM. Sobol‐Kwapinska
M. Sobol‐Kwapinska
WPWłodzimierz Płotek
Włodzimierz Płotek
PBP. Bąbel
P. Bąbel
MCMarcin Cybulski
Marcin Cybulski
AKAnna Kluzik
Anna Kluzik
MMM. Mandecki
M. Mandecki

18 March 2016 in Medical Science Monitor
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNStanislaw Nowak
Stanislaw Nowak
AOAnna Oldak
Anna Oldak
AKAnna Kluzik
Anna Kluzik
LDLeon Drobnik
Leon Drobnik
BACKGROUND:Controlled induced hypotension guarantees less blood loss and better visibility of the surgical site. The impact of hypotension on post-operative cognitive functions is still being discussed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the...

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPiotr Rzeźniczek
Piotr Rzeźniczek
AGAgnieszka Gaczkowska
Agnieszka Gaczkowska
AKAnna Kluzik
Anna Kluzik
MCMarcin Cybulski
Marcin Cybulski
ABAlicja Bartkowska-Sniatkowska
Alicja Bartkowska-Sniatkowska
MGMałgorzata Grześkowiak
Małgorzata Grześkowiak
Autoresuscitation is a phenomenon of the heart during which it can resume its spontaneous activity and generate circulation. It was described for the first time by K. Linko in 1982 as a recovery after discontinued cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). J.G. Bray named the recovery from death the Lazarus phenomenon in 1993. It is based on a biblical story of Jesus’ resurrection of Lazarus four days after confirmation of his death. Up to the end of 2022, 76 cases (coming from 27 countries) of spontaneous recovery after death were reported; among them, 10 occurred in children. The youngest patient was 9 months old, and the oldest was 97 years old. The longest resuscitation lasted 90 min, but the shortest was 6 min. Cardiac arrest occurred in and out of the hospital. The majority of the patients suffered from many diseases. In most cases of the Lazarus phenomenon, the observed rhythms at cardiac arrest were non-shockable (Asystole, PEA). Survival time after death ranged from minutes to hours, days, and even months. Six patients with the Lazarus phenomenon reached full recovery without neurological impairment. Some of the causes leading to autoresuscitation presented here are hyperventilation and alkalosis, auto-PEEP, delayed drug action, hypothermia, intoxication, metabolic disorders (hyperkalemia), and unobserved minimal vital signs. To avoid Lazarus Syndrome, it is recommended that the patient be monitored for 10 min after discontinuing CPR. Knowledge about this phenomenon should be disseminated in the medical community in order to improve the reporting of such cases. The probability of autoresuscitation among older people is possible.

1 April 2009 in Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAxel Fudickar
Axel Fudickar
AKAnna Kluzik
Anna Kluzik
NWNorbert Weiler
Norbert Weiler
JSJens Scholz
Jens Scholz
PTPeter Hans Tonner
Peter Hans Tonner
BBBerthold Bein
Berthold Bein
Measurement of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) using a new monitor integrated module was compared with an established device. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the new system could replace the more inconvenient established technique. MLAEP and BAEP were obtained from 19 anesthetized male patients using the AEP-Module for Monitor S/5 [GE, Helsinki, Finland (S/5)] and Neuropack 4 mini [Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan (Neuropack)]. Significance of different results was calculated by paired t test. Bias was estimated by Bland-Altman statistics. Latencies of BAEP were significantly shorter and amplitudes of BAEP were significantly higher for Neuropack. Mean latencies of MLAEP (Pa and Nb) were not significantly different (Pa 44.1+/-4.4 ms vs. 41.9+/-5.4 ms/Nb 66.4+/-5.6 ms vs. 62.8+/-6.5 ms), but methods are not interchangeable owing to great variability (Pa -13.16 to 8.94 ms, Nb -19.15 to 11.79 ms). BAEP recorded by S/5 cannot be used for diagnostic interpretation using generally accepted normal values, but can be used for examining changes during the monitoring period. Mean values of Pa and Nb were not significantly different, but values of the S/5 varied above and below the values of Neuropack such that the measurements could not be used for diagnostic interpretation. However, this did not reduce their usefulness for determining adequate hypnosis.

1 January 2012 in The Scientific World Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WPWłodzimierz Płotek
Włodzimierz Płotek
MCMarcin Cybulski
Marcin Cybulski
AKAnna Kluzik
Anna Kluzik
MGMałgorzata Grześkowiak
Małgorzata Grześkowiak
JJJacek Jelonek
Jacek Jelonek
LDLeon Drobnik
Leon Drobnik
Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate two measures in a cognitive examination: psychomotor function and the perception of time (PT) in patients after intravenous anesthesia for endoscopic procedures.Material and Methods. We tested 23 anesthetized patients (Anesthesia Group, AG) and 17 not anesthetized patients (Control Group, CG). The Dufour Cross-Shaped Apparatus (DA) was used to assess quick reactions. Perception of time (PT) was measured for 1-, 2-, 5-, and 7-second intervals. The tests were performed before the anesthesia was administered and 1.5, 3, and 6 hours after the procedure was completed.Results. The intervals that were generated and the reproduced visual stimuli were shorter than the patterns. The reproduced 1- and 2-second auditory stimuli were longer than the patterns. The remaining reproduced auditory impulses were shorter than the patterns.Conclusions. In anesthetized patients, quick psychomotor reactions and the ability to time intervals are preserved 1.5 h and later after intravenous anesthesia for endoscopy.