Rajan Ghimire

Prof. Rajan Ghimire

Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
SLSushil Lamichhane
Sushil Lamichhane
Bharat AcharyaBharat Acharya
Bharat Acharya
PBPrakriti Bista
Prakriti Bista
USUpendra Man Sainju
Upendra Man Sainju

1 August 2017 in Field Crops Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Upendra M SainjuUpendra M Sainju
Upendra M Sainju
BABrett L. Allen
Brett L. Allen
ALAndrew W. Lenssen
Andrew W. Lenssen
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire

10 October 2019 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPrakriti Bista
Prakriti Bista
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
SMStephen Machado
Stephen Machado
LPLarry Pritchett
Larry Pritchett
Biochar can improve soil health and crop productivity. We studied the response of soil properties and wheat growth to four rates of wood biochar (0, 11.2, 22.4, and 44.8 Mg ha−1) and two fertilizer rates [no fertilizer and fertilizer (90 kg N ha−1, 45 kg P ha−1, and 20 kg S ha−1)]. Biochar application increased soil organic matter (SOM), soil pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S) contents, and the shoot and root biomass of wheat. However, these responses were observed at biochar rates below 22.4 Mg ha−1, particularly in treatments without fertilizer. In fertilizer-applied treatments, soil nitrate levels decreased with an increase in biochar rates, mainly due to better crop growth and high nitrate uptake. However, without N addition, the high C:N ratio (500:1) possibly increased nutrient tie-up, reduced plant biomass, and SOM buildup at the highest biochar rate. Based on these results, we recommend biochar rates of about 22.4 Mg ha−1 and below for Walla Walla silt loams.

7 April 2011 in Paddy and Water Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
KAKeshav Raj Adhikari
Keshav Raj Adhikari
ZCZueng-Sang Chen
Zueng-Sang Chen
SSShree Chandra Shah
Shree Chandra Shah
KDKhem Raj Dahal
Khem Raj Dahal

1 July 2019 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
BGBinod Ghimire
Binod Ghimire
AMAbdel O. Mesbah
Abdel O. Mesbah
USUpendra M. Sainju
Upendra M. Sainju
OIOmololu J. Idowu
Omololu J. Idowu
Core Ideas: Effect of cover crops on selected soil health indicators and wheat yield was monitored. Response of soil organic matter pools varied with cover crops and sampling dates. Oat and its mixtures as cover crops have potential to improve soil health. Cover cropping has a potential to improve soil health in semiarid regions. This research evaluated the effects of spring‐planted cover crops on selected soil health indicators in limited‐irrigated winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow system. Soil health parameters measured include soil water content (SWC), soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), potentially mineralizable carbon (PMC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), inorganic N, and available P. Cover crops tested were pea (Pisum sativum L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), pea + oat (PO), pea + canola (PC), pea + oat + canola (POC), pea + oat + canola + hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) + forage radish (Raphanus sativus L.) + barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (SSM), and a fallow. Cover crops were planted in February and terminated in May after 85 to 90 d. Cover crop biomass was 33 to 142% greater with oat, PO, PC, POC, and SSM than pea and canola. The SWC was 2 to 3% lower under cover crops than fallow plots at their termination, but was 2 and 4% greater in SSM and POC than fallow at wheat planting in October. Soil inorganic N was 41 to 49% lower with cover crops than fallow at termination date. Soil PMC and POXC varied with cover crop species and sampling dates. The SOC and STN contents were 18 to 20% greater with oat than PC. Oat and its mixture with other cover crops show promises to improve soil health and resilience.

13 December 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBinod Ghimire
Binod Ghimire
Rajan GhimireRajan Ghimire
Rajan Ghimire
DVDawn VanLeeuwen
Dawn VanLeeuwen
AMAbdel Mesbah
Abdel Mesbah
Decline in soil organic carbon (SOC) and the associated impacts on crop production under conventional farming raises concerns on how alternative management practices increase SOC sequestration and improve agricultural sustainability. This study aimed to understand SOC mineralization kinetics with different cover crop (CC) residue amendments. Soil samples were collected from a fallow and three CC (pea, oat, and canola) plots. Soil samples from the CC plots were manipulated with zero, five, and 10 Mg ha−1 of the respective CC residues. All soil samples were incubated for eight weeks, SOC mineralization was monitored, and the first order kinetic and parabolic equation models were fitted to the observed data for estimating labile SOC (C0), and the decomposition rate constant (k). Subsequent comparisons of fitted model parameters were based on the first order kinetic model. The C0 varied with the residue amount while k varied with CC type. C0 was 591–858% greater with 10 Mg ha−1 and 289–456% greater with five Mg ha−1 residue additions while k was 122–297% greater with 10 Mg ha−1 and 94–240% greater with five Mg ha−1 residue additions when compared to the fallow treatment. The CC residue stimulated cumulative carbon mineralization (Cmin) irrespective of CC type, suggesting that cover cropping has potential to improve SOC cycling in agroecosystems.