In the general population, the lowest mortality risk is considered to be for the body mass index (BMI) range of 20–24.9 kg/m². In chronic diseases (chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) the best survival is observed in overweight or obese patients. Recently above-mentioned phenomenon, called obesity paradox, has been described in patients with coronary artery disease. Our aim was to analyze the relationship between BMI and total mortality in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the context of obesity paradox. We searched scientific databases for studies describing relation in body mass index with mortality in patients with ACS. The study selection process was performed according to PRISMA statement. Crude mortality rates, odds ratio or risk ratio for all-cause mortality were extracted from articles and included into meta-analysis. 26 studies and 218,532 patients with ACS were included into meta-analysis. The highest risk of mortality was found in Low BMI patients—RR 1.47 (95 % CI 1.24–1.74). Overweight, obese and severely obese patients had lower mortality compared with those with normal BMI–RR 0.70 (95 % CI 0.64–0.76), RR 0.60, (95 % CI 0.53–0.68) and RR 0.70 (95 % CI 0.58–0.86), respectively. The obesity paradox in patients with ACS has been confirmed. Although it seems to be clear and quite obvious, outcomes should be interpreted with caution. It is remarkable that obese patients had more often diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, but they were younger and had less bleeding complications, which could have influence on their survival.

Background: We aimed to compare statin monotherapy and upfront combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Methods and Results: The study included consecutive patients with ACS included in the PL‐ACS (Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes), which is a national, multicenter, ongoing, prospective observational registry that is mandatory for patients with ACS hospitalized in Poland. Data were matched using the Mahalanobis distance within propensity score matching calipers. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis, including all variables, was next used in propensity score matching analysis. Finally, 38 023 consecutive patients with ACS who were discharged alive were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching, 2 groups were analyzed: statin monotherapy (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin; n=768) and upfront combination therapy of statin and ezetimibe (n=768 patients). The difference in mortality between groups was significant during the follow‐up and was present at 1 (5.9% versus 3.5%; P =0.041), 2 (7.8% versus 4.3%; P =0.019), and 3 (10.2% versus 5.5%; P =0.024) years of follow‐up in favor of the upfront combination therapy, as well as for the overall period. For the treatment, rosuvastatin significantly improved prognosis compared with atorvastatin (odds ratio [OR], 0.790 [95% CI, 0.732–0.853]). Upfront combination therapy was associated with a significant reduction of all‐cause mortality in comparison with statin monotherapy (OR, 0.526 [95% CI, 0.378–0.733]), with absolute risk reduction of 4.7% after 3 years (number needed to treat=21). Conclusions: The upfront combination lipid‐lowering therapy is superior to statin monotherapy for all‐cause mortality in patients with ACS. These results suggest that in high‐risk patients, such an approach, rather than a stepwise therapy approach, should be recommended.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has emerged as a strong marker of worse outcomes. We determined the association between PLR and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Five hundred and twenty three patients were enrolled. Low PLR (group 1, n = 349) was defined as ≤ 124 and high PLR (group 2, n = 174) as >124. In-hospital and 1-year mortality was higher in group 2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed moderate diagnostic value in predicting in-hospital (PLR cut-off >155) and long-term (PLR cut-off >146) death. PLR remained an independent risk factor of early and late mortality. PLR proved to have good prognostic value for in-hospital and late mortality. PLR cut-off value for predicting in-hospital mortality was higher to that predicting late mortality. PLR remained an independent risk factor early and late mortality.

Aim: Albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) is emerged as a marker of impaired prognosis. We determined the predictive value of AGR in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methodology: 999 patients with HFrEF were enrolled. Rates of 1-year all-cause mortality were compared between AGR quartiles (Q). Moreover, multivariate survival analysis in Cox's regression model and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. Results: 90-day and 1-year mortality was the highest in AGR Q1. AGR was an independent predictor of 90-day and 1-year mortality. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed moderate diagnostic value in predicting 90-day (AGR cutoff <1.2) and 1-year (AGR cutoff <1.38) mortality. Conclusion: AGR had a good prognostic value and remained an independent predictor of mortality in HFrEF patients.

Background: Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a simple and reliable indicator of platelet size that correlates with platelet activation and their ability to aggregate. We studied the predictive value of MPV in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We analyzed the consecutive records of 1001 patients who were hospitalized due to NSTEMI at our center. The primary end point was a composite end point that included the rates of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) driven revascularization at 12 months. The enrolled patients were stratified according to the quartile of the MPV level at admission. Results: Along with the increasing quartile of MPV, the 12-month composite end point increased significantly (p = 0.010), and this association remained significant after the risk-adjusted analyses (per 1 fL higher MPV; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.27; p = 0.026). In the multivariate analysis, the MPV was also an independent factor of all-cause mortality (per 1 fL increase; adjusted HR 1.34; 95% CI 1.12–1.61; p = 0.0014) and death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (per 1 fL increase; adjusted HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03–1.31; p = 0.017). Conclusion: In patients with NSTEMI treated with PCI, a high MPV value was associated with a significantly increased incidence of long-term adverse events, particularly for all-cause mortality.