Peter Veltink

Prof. Dr. Peter Veltink

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 1997 in Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJ C Lötters
J C Lötters
WOW Olthuis
W Olthuis
PVPeter Veltink
Peter Veltink
PBP Bergveld
P Bergveld

1 April 2005 in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLH. J. Luinge
H. J. Luinge
PVPeter Veltink
Peter Veltink

1 April 2002 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMRuth E. Mayagoitia
Ruth E. Mayagoitia
ANAnand V. Nene
Anand V. Nene
PVPeter Veltink
Peter Veltink

12 September 2005 in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRD. Roetenberg
D. Roetenberg
HLH.J. Luinge
H.J. Luinge
CBC.T.M. Baten
C.T.M. Baten
PVPeter Veltink
Peter Veltink
This paper describes a complementary Kalman filter design to estimate orientation of human body segments by fusing gyroscope, accelerometer, and magnetometer signals from miniature sensors. Ferromagnetic materials or other magnetic fields near the sensor module disturb the local earth magnetic field and, therefore, the orientation estimation, which impedes many (ambulatory) applications. In the filter, the gyroscope bias error, orientation error, and magnetic disturbance error are estimated. The filter was tested under quasi-static and dynamic conditions with ferromagnetic materials close to the sensor module. The quasi-static experiments implied static positions and rotations around the three axes. In the dynamic experiments, three-dimensional rotations were performed near a metal tool case. The orientation estimated by the filter was compared with the orientation obtained with an optical reference system Vicon. Results show accurate and drift-free orientation estimates. The compensation results in a significant difference (p<0.01) between the orientation estimates with compensation of magnetic disturbances in comparison to no compensation or only gyroscopes. The average static error was 1.4/spl deg/ (standard deviation 0.4) in the magnetically disturbed experiments. The dynamic error was 2.6/spl deg/ root means square.

1 January 2007 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLH.J. Luinge
H.J. Luinge
PVPeter Veltink
Peter Veltink
CBC.T.M. Baten
C.T.M. Baten

16 April 2007 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DRDaniel Roetenberg
Daniel Roetenberg
PSPer J. Slycke
Per J. Slycke
PVPeter Veltink
Peter Veltink
This paper presents the design and testing of a portable magnetic system combined with miniature inertial sensors for ambulatory 6 degrees of freedom ( DOF) human motion tracking. The magnetic system consists of three orthogonal coils, the source, fixed to the body and 3-D magnetic sensors, fixed to remote body segments, which measure the fields generated by the source. Based on the measured signals, a processor calculates the relative positions and orientations between source and sensor. Magnetic actuation requires a substantial amount of energy which limits the update rate with a set of batteries. Moreover, the magnetic field can easily be disturbed by ferromagnetic materials or other sources. Inertial sensors can be sampled at high rates, require only little energy and do not suffer from magnetic interferences. However, accelerometers and gyroscopes can only measure changes in position and orientation and suffer from integration drift. By combing measurements from both systems in a complementary Kalman filter structure, an optimal solution for position and orientation estimates is obtained. The magnetic system provides 6 DOF measurements at a relatively low update rate while the inertial sensors track the changes position and orientation in between the magnetic updates. The implemented system is tested against a lab-bound camera tracking system for several functional body movements. The accuracy was about 5 mm for position and 3 degrees for orientation measurements. Errors were higher during movements with high velocities due to relative movement between source and sensor within one cycle of magnetic actuation