Gemma Armengol

Dr. Gemma Armengol

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 July 2022 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVirinder Kaur Sarhadi
Virinder Kaur Sarhadi
Gemma ArmengolGemma Armengol
Gemma Armengol
Molecular cancer biomarkers are any measurable molecular indicator of risk of cancer, occurrence of cancer, or patient outcome. They may include germline or somatic genetic variants, epigenetic signatures, transcriptional changes, and proteomic signatures. These indicators are based on biomolecules, such as nucleic acids and proteins, that can be detected in samples obtained from tissues through tumor biopsy or, more easily and non-invasively, from blood (or serum or plasma), saliva, buccal swabs, stool, urine, etc. Detection technologies have advanced tremendously over the last decades, including techniques such as next-generation sequencing, nanotechnology, or methods to study circulating tumor DNA/RNA or exosomes. Clinical applications of biomarkers are extensive. They can be used as tools for cancer risk assessment, screening and early detection of cancer, accurate diagnosis, patient prognosis, prediction of response to therapy, and cancer surveillance and monitoring response. Therefore, they can help to optimize making decisions in clinical practice. Moreover, precision oncology is needed for newly developed targeted therapies, as they are functional only in patients with specific cancer genetic mutations, and biomarkers are the tools used for the identification of these subsets of patients. Improvement in the field of cancer biomarkers is, however, needed to overcome the scientific challenge of developing new biomarkers with greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.

15 August 2007 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gemma ArmengolGemma Armengol
Gemma Armengol
FRFederico Rojo
Federico Rojo
JCJosep Castellvi
Josep Castellvi
CICarmela Iglesias
Carmela Iglesias
Miriam CuatrecasasMiriam Cuatrecasas
Miriam Cuatrecasas
Santiago Ramo´n y CajalSantiago Ramo´n y Cajal
Santiago Ramo´n y Cajal
In an attempt to identify molecules that clearly reflect the oncogenic role of cell signaling pathways in human tumors, we propose a concept we term “funnel factor”, a factor where several oncogenic signals converge and drive the proliferative signal downstream. In studies done in various tumor types, the expression of key cell signaling factors, including Her1 and Her2 growth factor receptors, as well as the RAS-RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin pathways was correlated with the associated clinicopathologic characteristics of these tumors. The downstream factors p70, S6, 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, which play a critical role in the control of protein synthesis, survival, and cell growth, were also analyzed. We found that phosphorylated 4E-BP1 (p-4E-BP1) expression in breast, ovary, and prostate tumors is associated with malignant progression and an adverse prognosis regardless of the upstream oncogenic alterations. Thus, p-4E-BP1 seems to act as a funnel factor for an essential oncogenic capability of tumor cells, self-sufficiency in growth signals, and could be a highly relevant molecular marker of malignant potential. Further investigation into this concept may identify additional funnel factors in the oncogenic pathways and provide potential therapeutic targets. [Cancer Res 2007;67(16):7551–5]

5 December 2020 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KLKatalin Lumniczky
Katalin Lumniczky
NINathalie Impens
Nathalie Impens
Gemma ArmengolGemma Armengol
Gemma Armengol
SCSerge Candéias
Serge Candéias
ALEXANDROS GEORGAKILASALEXANDROS GEORGAKILAS
ALEXANDROS GEORGAKILAS
DSDörthe Schaue
Dörthe Schaue
Ionizing radiation interacts with the immune system in many ways with a multiplicity that mirrors the complexity of the immune system itself: namely the need to maintain a delicate balance between different compartments, cells and soluble factors that work collectively to protect, maintain, and restore tissue function in the face of severe challenges including radiation damage. The cytotoxic effects of high dose radiation are less relevant after low dose exposure, where subtle quantitative and functional effects predominate that may go unnoticed until late after exposure or after a second challenge reveals or exacerbates the effects. For example, low doses may permanently alter immune fitness and therefore accelerate immune senescence and pave the way for a wide spectrum of possible pathophysiological events, including early-onset of age-related degenerative disorders and cancer. By contrast, the so called low dose radiation therapy displays beneficial, anti-inflammatory and pain relieving properties in chronic inflammatory and degenerative diseases. In this review, epidemiological, clinical and experimental data regarding the effects of low-dose radiation on the homeostasis and functional integrity of immune cells will be discussed, as will be the role of immune-mediated mechanisms in the systemic manifestation of localized exposures such as inflammatory reactions. The central conclusion is that ionizing radiation fundamentally and durably reshapes the immune system. Further, the importance of discovery of immunological pathways for modifying radiation resilience amongst other research directions in this field is implied.

1 May 1997 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gemma ArmengolGemma Armengol
Gemma Armengol
MTM Tarkkanen
M Tarkkanen
MVM Virolainen
M Virolainen
AFA Forus
A Forus
JVJ Valle
J Valle
SKS Knuutila
S Knuutila
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to detect copy number changes of DNA sequences in the Ewing family of tumours (ET). We analysed 20 samples from 17 patients. Fifteen tumours (75%) showed copy number changes. Gains of DNA sequences were much more frequent than losses, the majority of the gains affecting whole chromosomes or whole chromosome arms. Recurrent findings included copy number increases for chromosomes 8 (seven out of 20 samples; 35%), 1q (five samples; 25%) and 12 (five samples; 25%). The minimal common regions of these gains were the whole chromosomes 8 and 12, and 1q21-22. High-level amplifications affected 8q13-24, 1q and 1q21-22, each once. Southern blot analysis of the specimen with high-level amplification at 1q21-22 showed an amplification of FLG and SPRR3, both mapped to this region. All cases with a gain of chromosome 12 simultaneously showed a gain of chromosome 8. Comparison of CGH findings with cytogenetic analysis of the same tumours and previous cytogenetic reports of ET showed, in general, concordant results. In conclusion, our findings confirm that secondary changes, which may have prognostic significance in ET, are trisomy 8, trisomy 12 and a gain of DNA sequences in 1q.

4 November 2005 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJordi Camps
Jordi Camps
Gemma ArmengolGemma Armengol
Gemma Armengol
JRJavier del Rey
Javier del Rey
JLJuan Jose Lozano
Juan Jose Lozano
HVHanna Vauhkonen
Hanna Vauhkonen
RMRosa Miró
Rosa Miró
Genomic copy number changes are frequently found in cancers and they have been demonstrated to contribute to carcinogenesis; and it is widely accepted that tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) are genetically stable and mostly diploid. In the present study we compared the copy number alterations and the gene-expression profiles of microsatellite stable (MSS) and MSI colorectal tumors. A total number of 31 fresh-frozen primary tumors (16 MSS and 15 MSI) were used. Twenty-eight samples (15 MSS and 13 MSI) were analyzed with metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), nine of which plus one additional sample (4 MSS and 6 MSI) were further analyzed by cDNA-based array-CGH. Gene expression analysis was performed with six samples [3 MSS and 3 MSI, four of these used in metaphase CGH (mCGH) analysis] to identify differentially expressed genes possibly located in the lost or amplified regions found by CGH, stressing the biological significance of copy number changes. Metaphase and array-CGH analysis of two colon cancer cell lines (HTC116 and SW480, reported as MSI and MSS archetypes) gave comparable results. Alterations found by mCGH in MSS tumors were +20, +8q, −8p and −18q. Interestingly, 1p22, 4q26 and 15q21 were found deleted preferentially in MSS tumors, while 22q13 was found gained in MSI tumors. The regions of alterations identified by array-CGH were gains at 8q24, 16q24.3 and 20q13, and the loss of 5q21, appearing in the both types of tumors. Gene expression analysis revealed genes with specific associations with the copy number changes of the corresponding genomic regions. As a conclusion, colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease, demonstrated by the genomic profiles of individual samples. However, our data shows that copy number changes do not occur exclusively in the MSS phenotypes.

1 October 1999 in Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTM Tarkkanen
M Tarkkanen
SKS Kiuru-Kuhlefelt
S Kiuru-Kuhlefelt
CBC Blomqvist
C Blomqvist
Gemma ArmengolGemma Armengol
Gemma Armengol
TBT Böhling
T Böhling
IEI Elomaa
I Elomaa