In a prospective study of risk factors for lateral ankle sprain among 390 male Israeli infantry recruits, a 18% incidence of lateral ankle sprains was found in basic training. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of lateral ankle sprains between recruits who trained in modified basketball shoes or standard lightweight infantry boots. By multivariate stepwise logistic regression a statistically significant relationship was found between body weight × height 2 (a magnitude which is proportional to the mass moment of inertia of the body around a horizontal axis through the ankle), a previous history of ankle sprain, and the incidence of lateral ankle sprains. Recruits who were taller and heavier and thus had larger mass moments of inertia ( P = 0.004), and those with a prior history of ankle sprain ( P = 0.01) had higher lateral ankle sprain morbidity in basic training.
We undertook a prospective study in 51 male patients aged between 17 and 27 years to ascertain whether immobilisation after primary traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder in external rotation was more effective than immobilisation in internal rotation in preventing recurrent dislocation in a physically active population. Of the 51 patients, 24 were randomised to be treated by a traditional brace in internal rotation and 27 were immobilised in external rotation of 15° to 20°. After immobilisation, the patients undertook a standard regime of physiotherapy and were then assessed clinically for evidence of instability. When reviewed at a mean of 33.4 months (24 to 48) ten from the external rotation group (37%) and ten from the internal rotation group (41.7%) had sustained a futher dislocation. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.74) between the groups. Our findings show that external rotation bracing may not be as effective as previously reported in preventing recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder.
1 March 2000 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
In three prospective epidemiologic studies of the effect of pre-military-induction sport activities on the incidence of lower extremity stress fractures during infantry basic training, recruits who played ball sports (principally basketball) regularly for at least 2 years before basic training had a significantly lower incidence of stress fractures (13.2%, 16.7%, and 3.6% in the three studies, respectively) than recruits who did not play ball sports (28.9%, 27%, and 18.8%, respectively). Preinduction running was not related to the incidence of stress fracture. To assess the tibial strain environment during these sport activities, we made in vivo strain measurements on three male volunteers from the research team. Peak tibial compression and tension strain and strain rates during basketball reached levels 2 to 5.5 times higher than during walking and about 10% to 50% higher than during running. The high bone strain and strain rates that occurred in recruits while playing basketball in the years before military induction may have increased their bone stiffness, according to Wolff's Law. The stiffer bone could tolerate higher stresses better, resulting in lower strains for a given activity and a lower incidence of stress fractures during basic training.
Background—Bone must have sufficient strength to withstand both instantaneous forces and lower repetitive forces. Repetitive loading, especially when bone strain and/or strain rates are high, can create microdamage and result in stress fractureAim—To measure in vivo strains and strain rates in human tibia during high impact and moderate impact exercises.Methods—Three strain gauged bone staples were mounted percutaneously in a rosette pattern in the mid diaphysis of the medial tibia in six normal subjects, and in vivo tibial strains were measured during running at 17 km/h and drop jumping from heights of 26, 39, and 52 cm.Results—Complete data for all three drop jumps were obtained for four of the six subjects. No statistically significant differences were found in compression, tension, or shear strains with increasing drop jump height, but, at the 52 cm height, shear strain rate was reduced by one third (p = 0.03). No relation was found between peak compression strain and calculated drop jump energy, indicating that subjects were able to dissipate part of the potential energy of successively higher drop jumps by increasing the range of motion of their knee and ankle joints and not transmitting the energy to their tibia. No statistically significant differences were found between the principal strains during running and drop jumping from 52 cm, but compression (p = 0.01) and tension (p = 0.004) strain rates were significantly higher during running.Conclusions—High impact exercises, as represented by drop jumping in this experiment, do not cause higher tibial strains and strain rates than running and therefore are unlikely to place an athlete who is accustomed to fast running at higher risk for bone fatigue.