Pierre Giglio

Dr. Pierre Giglio

Department of Neuro-Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DFDENISE FABIAN
DENISE FABIAN
MEMaria del Pilar Guillermo Prieto Eibl
Maria del Pilar Guillermo Prieto Eibl
IAIyad Alnahhas
Iyad Alnahhas
NSNikhil Sebastian
Nikhil Sebastian
Pierre GiglioPierre Giglio
Pierre Giglio
Joshua PalmerJoshua Palmer
Joshua Palmer
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor. Despite aggressive treatment, GBM almost always recurs. The current standard-of-care for treatment of newly diagnosed GBM has remained relatively unchanged since 2005: maximal safe resection followed by concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) with temozolomide (TMZ), and subsequent adjuvant TMZ. In 2011, the first-generation tumor treating fields (TTF) device, known at the time as the NovoTTF-100A System (renamed Optune), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of recurrent GBM. The TTF device was subsequently approved as an adjuvant therapy for newly-diagnosed GBM in 2015. The following is a review of the TTF device, including evidence supporting its use and limitations.

2 February 2023 in Cancer Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KFKristina Fanucci
Kristina Fanucci
MPMary Jo Pilat
Mary Jo Pilat
DSDerek Shyr
Derek Shyr
YSYu Shyr
Yu Shyr
SBScott Boerner
Scott Boerner
PLPatricia LoRusso
Patricia LoRusso
Purpose: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and IDH2 mutations (IDH1/2mt) are frequent in glioma. Preclinical studies suggest IDH1/2mts confer “BRCAness” phenotype, a vulnerability that can be targeted through PARP inhibition. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a multicenter study of olaparib monotherapy in patients with IDH1/2mt gliomas.Methods: Patients with recurrent, contrast-enhancing IDH1/2mt gliomas were enrolled in a two-step phase II trial; the primary endpoint was overall response rate per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily was given.Results: A total of 15 evaluable patients were enrolled. Histology was astrocytoma (N = 12) and oligodendroglioma (N = 3). Most toxicities were grade 1 or 2. Best response was stable disease (SD) in 9 (60%) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.63 months and median overall survival was 20.7 months. For patients with SD, median PFS was 5.53 months; 4 patients had SD for >6 months. Among patients with best response progressive disease (N = 6), 5 had grade 4 tumor and 4 had known CDKN2A alteration. PFS was 5.23 months for grades 2 or 3 tumors (N = 10) versus 1.8 months for grade 4 (N = 5; P = 0.0013).Conclusion: The study did not meet the prespecified response-based activity threshold for moving to step 2. However, prolonged SD was observed in patients with grades 2 and 3 histologies, suggesting olaparib monotherapy could be of clinical benefit in select populations. Grade 4 tumors per 2021 World Health Organization classification defined by histology or CDKN2A alteration derived no benefit from this drug, highlighting the usefulness of this classification for future patient stratification and trial design.Significance: A single-arm phase II trial of olaparib in IDH-mutant glioma demonstrated clinically significant prolonged SD for select patients with grade 2/3 disease, suggesting potential benefit of olaparib in IDH-mutant gliomas.

4 October 2021 in European Journal of Breast Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HRHannah N Rinehardt
Hannah N Rinehardt
MKMahmoud Kassem
Mahmoud Kassem
EMEvan Morgan
Evan Morgan
MPMarilly Palettas
Marilly Palettas
JSJulie Stephens
Julie Stephens
ANAnne Mary Noonan
Anne Mary Noonan
Objective: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), a common complication of - advanced malignancies, is associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet diagnosis and treatment decisions remain challenging. This study describes the diagnostic and treatment modalities for LMC and identifies factors associated with overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods: We performed a sin e-institution retrospective study (registration #: OSU2016C0053) of 153 patients diagnosed with LMC treated at The Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Center, (OSUCCC)-James between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 55.7 years, and 61% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group baseline performance status <= 1. Most common primary tumors were breast (43%), lung (26%), and cutaneous melanoma (10%). Ar presentation, most patients were stage III-IV (71%) with higher grade tumors (grade III: 46%). Metastases to bone (36%), brain (33%), and lung (12%) were the most common sites with a median of 0.5 years (range, 0-14.9 years) between the diagnosis of first metastasis and of LMC. 153 (100%) patients had MRl evidence of LMC. Of the 67 (44%) who underwent lumbar puncture (LP), 33 (22%) had positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Most patients received radiotherapy for LMC (60%) and chemotherapy (93%) for either the primary disease or LMC. 28 patients received intrathecal chemotherapy, 22 of whom had a primary diagnosis of breast cancer. 98% died with median OS of all patients was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.3-2.5 months). Conclusion: Despite improved treatments and targeted therapies, outcomes of LMC remain extremely poor. Positive CSF cytology was associated with lower OS in patients who had cytology assessed and specifically in patients with breast cancer. CSF cytology serves as an important indicator for prognosis and helps aid in developing individualized therapeutic strategies for patients with LMC.

1 January 2002 in Journal of Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AWArie Weinstock
Arie Weinstock
Pierre GiglioPierre Giglio
Pierre Giglio
MCMichael E. Cohen
Michael E. Cohen
RBRohit Bakshi
Rohit Bakshi
JJJohn Januario
John Januario
LBLucy Balos
Lucy Balos
We report a 15-year-old boy who presented with recurrent headaches associated with numbness, confusion, and speech difficulty. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed diffuse bilateral white-matter hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery and T2-weighted images in the internal capsule, periventricular and subcortical white matter, base of the pons, and middle cerebellar peduncles. Lesions were isointense on T1weighted images and nonenhancing. Muscle biopsy showed changes consistent with a mitochondrial myopathy. Mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activity analysis revealed a significant reduction in complex II activity. Genetic testing was negative. We conclude that mitochondrial encephalomyopathy may present with unusual diffuse supratentorial and infratentorial white-matter changes on MRI. (J Child Neurol 2002;17:47-49).

21 July 2022 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJennifer K Matsui
Jennifer K Matsui
HPHaley K. Perlow
Haley K. Perlow
ARAlex R. Ritter
Alex R. Ritter
RURituraj Upadhyay
Rituraj Upadhyay
RRRaju R. Raval
Raju R. Raval
Joshua PalmerJoshua Palmer
Joshua Palmer
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor that is associated with a poor prognosis and quality of life. The standard of care has changed minimally over the past two decades and currently consists of surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, and tumor treating fields (TTF). Factors such as tumor hypoxia and the presence of glioma stem cells contribute to the radioresistant nature of GBM. In this review, we discuss the current treatment modalities, mechanisms of radioresistance, and studies that have evaluated promising radiosensitizers. Specifically, we highlight small molecules and immunotherapy agents that have been studied in conjunction with RT in clinical trials. Recent preclinical studies involving GBM radiosensitizers are also discussed.

27 September 2025 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnna Piotrowski
Anna Piotrowski
KSKent Shih
Kent Shih
Pierre GiglioPierre Giglio
Pierre Giglio
HCHoward Colman
Howard Colman
PWPatrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen
MBMichael Badruddoja
Michael Badruddoja
Pamiparib, a small-molecule poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor, demonstrates strong PARP-DNA complex trapping, antitumor activity, and blood–brain barrier penetration. This phase Ib/II dose-escalation study (NCT03150862) investigated pamiparib’s tolerability/safety and efficacy when combined with radiotherapy and/or low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with treatment-naïve (Arms A and B) and recurrent/refractory (Arm C) glioblastoma. The recommended phase II dose for Arm A was pamiparib 60 mg twice daily (BID) for 6 weeks with 6–7 weeks radiotherapy; the recommended dose for Arm C was pamiparib 60 mg BID plus 60 mg TMZ (days 1–7; 28-day cycle). The Arm B escalation cohort completed enrollment; the expansion cohort was not opened. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/serious TEAEs were observed in 55.0%/36.7% (Arm A), 44.4%/22.2% (Arm B), and 66.0%/38.3% (Arm C) of patients. Disease control and objective response rates were 67.9% and 11.3%, respectively, for treatment-naïve patients in the dose-escalation and -expansion studies, and 40.9% and 13.6%, respectively, for recurrent/refractory patients. Median overall survival for treatment-naïve MGMT unmethylated patients was 12.8 months and 7.3 months for recurrent/refractory MGMT methylated and unmethylated patients. Pamiparib with radiotherapy and/or low-dose TMZ was tolerable for treatment-naïve or recurrent/refractory glioblastoma. Treatment-emergent cytopenia was manageable and reversible with dose reductions/interruptions. Combination regimens demonstrated antitumor activity.