José Manuel García-Montes

Dr. José Manuel García-Montes

University of Almeria (Spain)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Cristina Petisco RodríguezCristina Petisco Rodríguez
Cristina Petisco Rodríguez
Laura C. Sánchez SánchezLaura C. Sánchez Sánchez
Laura C. Sánchez Sánchez
Rubén Fernández GarcíaRubén Fernández García
Rubén Fernández García
JSJavier Sanchez-Sanchez
Javier Sanchez-Sanchez
José Manuel García-MontesJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
Eating disorders are associated with short and long-term consequences that can affect sports performance. The purposes of this study were to investigate whether female athletes, particularly gymnasts and footballers, exhibit more eating problems compared to female non-athletes, and to identify individual personality characteristics including anxiety, self-esteem, and perfectionism as possible contributors to eating disorder risk. In a sample of 120 participants, 80 adolescent female athletes were compared to a control condition of 40 non-athletes (mean age 17.2 ± 2.82). Participants responded to a questionnaire package to investigate the presence of disordered eating (SCOFF) and psychological variables in relation to disordered eating symptoms or eating disorder status. Subsequently, anthropometric measures were obtained individually by trained staff. There were statistically significant differences between conditions. One of the most important results was the score in SCOFF (Mann–Whitney = 604, p < 0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.52, r = 0.25), being higher in control than in the gymnast condition. These results suggest that non-athlete female adolescents show more disturbed eating behaviours and thoughts than female adolescents from aesthetic sport modalities and, therefore, may have an enhanced risk of developing clinical eating disorders.

1 August 2006 in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
José Manuel García-MontesJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
MPMarino Pérez-Álvarez
Marino Pérez-Álvarez
CBCristina Soto Balbuena
Cristina Soto Balbuena
SGSalvador Perona Garcelán
Salvador Perona Garcelán
Adolfo J. CangasAdolfo J. Cangas
Adolfo J. Cangas

Óliver JiménezÓliver Jiménez
Óliver Jiménez
Laura C. Sánchez SánchezLaura C. Sánchez Sánchez
Laura C. Sánchez Sánchez
José Manuel García-MontesJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychological impact of confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic, considering any protective factors, such as the practice of meditation or self-compassion, and their relationship with different lifestyles and circumstances of adults residing in Spain. A cross-sectional study was done using an anonymous online survey in which 412 participants filled out the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-2; the Impact of Events Scale; and the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form, reporting severe symptomatology of posttraumatic stress and mild anxiety and depression. Quality of cohabitation and age were found to be key variables in the psychological impact of confinement. The impact of confinement was more negative for those who reported very poor cohabitation as opposed to very good (F (3, 405) = 30.75, p ≤ 0.001, d = 2.44, r = 0.054) or for those under 35 years of age compared to those over 46 (F (2, 409) = 5.14, p = 0.006, d = 0.36). Practicing meditation was not revealed as a protective factor, but self-compassion was related to better cohabitation during confinement (F (3, 403) = 11.83, p ≤ 0.001, d = 1.05). These results could be relevant in designing psychological interventions to improve coping and mental health in other situations similar to confinement.

1 May 2009
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FZFLOR ZALDÍVAR
FLOR ZALDÍVAR
José Manuel García-MontesJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
PCPilar Flores Cubos
Pilar Flores Cubos
Fernando Sánchez-SantedFernando Sánchez-Santed
Fernando Sánchez-Santed
FRFrancisca López Ríos
Francisca López Ríos
AMAntonio Molina Moreno
Antonio Molina Moreno

1 September 2006 in British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
José Manuel García-MontesJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
Adolfo J. CangasAdolfo J. Cangas
Adolfo J. Cangas
MPM. Pérez‐Álvarez
M. Pérez‐Álvarez
ÁFÁngel M. Fidalgo
Ángel M. Fidalgo
OGOlga Gutiérrez
Olga Gutiérrez

6 November 2023 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDavid F. Carreno
David F. Carreno
NENikolett Eisenbeck
Nikolett Eisenbeck
RURubén Uclés‐Juárez
Rubén Uclés‐Juárez
José Manuel García-MontesJosé Manuel García-Montes
José Manuel García-Montes
ObjectiveThis study explores the reappraisal of personal values among people with cancer post-diagnosis and its connections to meaningfulness, encompassing personal meaning and sense of meaning, and various dimensions of quality of life.MethodsA total of 144 patients with diverse cancer types and a control group comprising 158 healthy adults with similar demographic characteristics completed the Valued Living Questionnaire-Perceived Change, the Personal Meaning Profile-Brief, the Portrait Values Questionnaire, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being.ResultsCancer patients displayed a substantial values reappraisal compared to healthy adults. They reported an increased significance of social areas and self-transcendental values, including close relationships (family, partner, and friends), spirituality, citizenship, and universalism, as well as an increased importance of self-care and self in general. Conversely, cancer patients assigned less importance to work and self-enhancement values such as stimulation, power, and achievement. Cluster analysis revealed that patients who reappraised their values exhibited higher meaningfulness and better indicators of quality of life, including spiritual and physical well-being, compared to patients who did not modify their value system.ConclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of assessing and promoting meaning-in-life adaptability among people with cancer, with potential applications in meaning-centered therapies and interventions aimed at enhancing psychological flexibility.