A snowpack’s δ²H and δ¹⁸O values evolve with snowfall, sublimation, evaporation, and melt, which produces temporally variable snowpack, snowmelt, and runoff isotope signals. As a snowpack ages, the relatively depleted δ²H and δ¹⁸O values of snow will become less depleted with sublimation and evaporation, and the internal distribution of isotope signals is altered with melt moving through and out of the snowpack. An examination of δ²H and δ¹⁸O values for snowpack, snowmelt, and ephemeral creek water in the Palouse Range of northern Idaho indicated an evolution from variably depleted snowpack to enriched snowmelt and relatively consistent isotope signals in springtime ephemeral creeks. Within the primary snow band of the mountain range and during the winter–spring period of 2019–2020, the snowpack had an isotope range of −130 to −75‰ for δ²H and −18 to −10.5‰ for δ¹⁸O with resulting snowmelt values of −120 to −90‰ for δ²H and −16.5 to −12.5‰ for δ¹⁸O. With runoff of snowmelt to ephemeral creeks, the isotope values compressed to −107 to −104‰ for δ²H and −15.5 to −14.5‰ for δ¹⁸O. Aging of the snowpack produced increasing densities in the base, middle, and upper layers along with a corresponding enrichment of isotope values. The highest elevation site indicated the least enrichment of δ²H and δ¹⁸O in the snowpack base layer, and the lowest elevation site indicated the strongest enrichment of δ²H and δ¹⁸O in the snowpack base layer. Deuterium excess decreased with snowpack aging processes of accumulation and melt release, along with the migration of water vapor and snowmelt within the snowpack. It is likely that winter melt (early depleted signal) is a primary contributor to creeks and groundwater along the Palouse Range, but the strong variability of snowpack isotope signals provides a wide range of possible isotope signals to surface-water and groundwater systems at the mountain front.

Changes in climate and water demand in densely populated regions increasingly affect hydrological systems, and, in turn, impact socioeconomic conditions. In this case study, we identify how the hydrogeological frameworks of two water resource management units, Tietê-Jacaré (TJ) and Piracicaba-Capivari-Jundiaí (PCJ) in Sao Paulo state (Brazil), control the baseflow processes and resilience in the face of streamflow fluctuations in response to anthropogenic activities and climate variation. The results reveal between 40% and 75% contributions of baseflow to total streamflow in basins overlying crystalline and sedimentary aquifers. The basins in PCJ which mostly overly crystalline aquifers, have shorter water residence times and greater dependence on surface water. Therefore, streamflow in the PCJ basins is vulnerable during the drought period and the management model affected the water resilience of the basins (transfer of water to Cantareira System). The TJ basins have greater streamflow contributions from aquifer discharge linked to the presence of important sedimentary aquifers, which improves resilience under changing rainfall patterns, these basins present a more stable situation of resilience. Ultimately, the two management units require different planning strategies with adaptive and dynamic actions to mitigate the social, economic, and environmental effects caused by the variability and reduction of water sources.

Frequent droughts, seasonal precipitation, and growing agricultural water demand in the Yakima River Basin (YRB), located in Washington State, increase the challenges of optimizing water provision for agricultural producers. Increasing water storage through managed aquifer recharge (MAR) can potentially relief water stress from single and multi-year droughts. In this study, we developed an aggregated water resources management tool using a System Dynamics (SD) framework for the YRB and evaluated the MAR implementation strategy and the effectiveness of MAR in alleviating drought impacts on irrigation reliability. The SD model allocates available water resources to meet instream target flows, hydropower demands, and irrigation demand, based on system operation rules, irrigation scheduling, water rights, and MAR adoption. Our findings suggest that the adopted infiltration area for MAR is one of the main factors that determines the amount of water withdrawn and infiltrated to the groundwater system. The implementation time frame is also critical in accumulating MAR entitlements for single-year and multi-year droughts mitigation. In addition, adoption behaviors drive a positive feedback that MAR effectiveness on drought mitigation will encourage more MAR adoptions in the long run. MAR serves as a promising option for water storage management and a long-term strategy for MAR implementation can improve system resilience to unexpected droughts.