Chenglin Liu

Chenglin Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in China Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RLRui-Qin Li
Rui-Qin Li
Chenglin LiuChenglin Liu
Chenglin Liu
PJPeng-Cheng Jiao
Peng-Cheng Jiao
JWJiu-Yi Wang
Jiu-Yi Wang
With the technological development of exploitation and separation, the primary source of lithium has gradually changed from ore to brine, which has become the main raw material, accounting for more than 80% of the total production. Resources of lithium-bearing brine are abundant in China. This paper has summarized the spatial and temporal distribution, characteristics, and formation mechanism of the lithium-rich brine in China, aiming to provide a comprehensive set of guidelines for future lithium exploitation from brines. Lithium brines usually exist in modern saline lakes and deep underground sedimentary rocks as subsurface brines. The metallogenic epoch of China's lithium-rich brine spans from the Triassic to the Quaternary, and these brines exhibit obvious regional distribution characteristics. Modern lithium-rich saline lakes are predominately located in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. In comparison, the subsurface lithium-rich brines are mainly distributed in the sedimentary basins of Sichuan, Hubei, Jiangxi, and the western part of the Qaidam Basin. Lithium-rich saline lakes are chloride-enriched, sulfate-enriched, and carbonate-enriched, while the deep lithium-rich brines are mainly chloride-enriched. On the whole, the value of Mg/Li in deep brine is generally lower than that of brine in saline lakes. The genesis of lithium-rich brines in China is not uniform, generally there are two processes, which are respectively suitable for salt lakes and deep brine.

7 March 2020 in Carbonates and Evaporites
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RLRuiqin Li
Ruiqin Li
Chenglin LiuChenglin Liu
Chenglin Liu
PJPengcheng Jiao
Pengcheng Jiao
WLWanping Liu
Wanping Liu
SWShijun Wang
Shijun Wang

20 April 2021 in Aquatic Geochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XYXueyin Yuan
Xueyin Yuan
YHYufei Hu
Yufei Hu
YZYanjun Zhao
Yanjun Zhao
QLQiang Li
Qiang Li
Chenglin LiuChenglin Liu
Chenglin Liu

20 January 2021 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLijian Shen
Lijian Shen
Licheng WangLicheng Wang
Licheng Wang
Chenglin LiuChenglin Liu
Chenglin Liu
YZYanjun Zhao
Yanjun Zhao
Evaporites are widely distributed within continental “red beds” in the Lanping–Simao Basin, west Yunnan, China. Sr (Strontium), S (Sulfur), and O (Oxygen) isotope compositions have been measured on 54 sulfate or/and sulfate-bearing samples collected from Lanping, Nuodeng, Jinggu, Mengyejing, Baozang throughout the Lanping–Simao Basin. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of all samples (0.708081 to 0.710049) are higher than those of contemporaneous seawater, indicating a significant continental contribution to the drainage basin. Sulfates in the Lanping Basin have higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.709406 to 0.710049) than those (0.708081 to 0.709548) in the Simao Basin. Nevertheless, the δ34S values of gypsums (13.4‰ to 17.6‰) in Lanping and Baozang fall within the range of Cretaceous seawater. Gypsums from a single section in Baozang have trends of decreasing δ34S values and increasing 87Sr/86Sr ratios from base to top, indicating continental input played an increasingly significant role with the evaporation of brines. High δ34S values (20.5‰ to 20.7‰) of celestites in Lanping are probably caused by bacterial sulfate reduction (BSR) process in which 34S were enriched in residual sulfates and/or recycling of Triassic evaporites. The reduced δ34S values of gypsums (9.5‰ to 10.4‰) in Nuodeng could have been caused by oxidation of sulfides weathered from Jinding Pb-Zn deposit. The complex O isotope compositions indicate that sulfates in the Lanping–Simao Basin had undergone sulfate reduction, re-oxidation, reservoir effects, etc. In conclusion, the formation of continental evaporites was likely derived from seawater due to marine transgression during the Cretaceous period. Meanwhile, non-marine inflows have contributed to the basin significantly.

1 December 2006 in Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Chenglin LiuChenglin Liu
Chenglin Liu
WMWang Mili
Wang Mili
JPJiao Pengcheng
Jiao Pengcheng
LSLi Shude
Li Shude
CYChen Yongzhi
Chen Yongzhi

1 February 2017 in Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLijian Shen
Lijian Shen
Chenglin LiuChenglin Liu
Chenglin Liu
LWLicheng Wang
Licheng Wang
YHYufei Hu
Yufei Hu
MHMingyue Hu
Mingyue Hu
YFYuexing Feng
Yuexing Feng