Tucker J. Furniss

Dr. Tucker J. Furniss


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 May 2018 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
James A. LutzJames A. Lutz
James A. Lutz
TFTucker J. Furniss
Tucker J. Furniss
Daniel J. JohnsonDaniel J. Johnson
Daniel J. Johnson
SDStuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies
DADavid Allen
David Allen
JZJess K. Zimmerman
Jess K. Zimmerman

25 June 2018 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAPeter B Adler
Peter B Adler
DSDanielle Smull
Danielle Smull
KBKaren H. Beard
Karen H. Beard
RCRyan T Choi
Ryan T Choi
TFTucker J. Furniss
Tucker J. Furniss
KVKari E Veblen
Kari E Veblen

30 June 2017 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJoseph A. LaManna
Joseph A. LaManna
SMScott A. Mangan
Scott A. Mangan
AAAlfonso Alonso
Alfonso Alonso
NBNorman A. Bourg
Norman A. Bourg
WBWarren Y. Brockelman
Warren Y. Brockelman
JMJonathan A. Myers
Jonathan A. Myers
Maintaining tree diversity: Negative interaction among plant species is known as conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD). This ecological pattern is thought to maintain higher species diversity in the tropics. LaManna et al. tested this hypothesis by comparing how tree species diversity changes with the intensity of local biotic interactions in tropical and temperate latitudes (see the Perspective by Comita). Stronger local specialized biotic interactions seem to prevent erosion of biodiversity in tropical forests, not only by limiting populations of common species, but also by strongly stabilizing populations of rare species, which tend to show higher CNDD in the tropics. Science , this issue p. 1389 ; see also p. 1328

1 October 2016 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAndrew J. Larson
Andrew J. Larson
CCC. Alina Cansler
C. Alina Cansler
SCSeth G. Cowdery
Seth G. Cowdery
SHSienna Hiebert
Sienna Hiebert
TFTucker J. Furniss
Tucker J. Furniss
James A. LutzJames A. Lutz
James A. Lutz

1 February 2020 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTucker J. Furniss
Tucker J. Furniss
VKVan R. Kane
Van R. Kane
ALAndrew J. Larson
Andrew J. Larson
James A. LutzJames A. Lutz
James A. Lutz

6 August 2020 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TFTucker J. Furniss
Tucker J. Furniss
ALAndrew J. Larson
Andrew J. Larson
VKVan R. Kane
Van R. Kane
James A. LutzJames A. Lutz
James A. Lutz
Background tree mortality is a complex process that requires large sample sizes and long timescales to disentangle the suite of ecological factors that collectively contribute to tree stress, decline, and eventual mortality. Tree mortality associated with acute disturbance events, in contrast, is conspicuous and frequently studied, but there remains a lack of research regarding the role of background mortality processes in mediating the severity and delayed effects of disturbance. We conducted an empirical study by measuring the rates, causes, and spatial pattern of mortality annually among 32,989 individual trees within a large forest demography plot in the Sierra Nevada. We characterized the relationships between background mortality, compound disturbances (fire and drought), and forest spatial structure, and we integrated our findings with a synthesis of the existing literature from around the world to develop a conceptual framework describing the spatio‐temporal signatures of background and disturbance‐related tree mortality. The interactive effects of fire, drought, and background mortality processes altered the rate, spatial structuring, and ecological consequences of mortality. Before fire, spatially non‐random mortality was only evident among small (1 < cm DBH ≤ 10)‐ and medium (10 < cm DBH ≤ 60)‐diameter classes; mortality rates were low (1.7% per yr), and mortality was density‐dependent among small‐diameter trees. Direct fire damage caused the greatest number of moralities (70% of stems ≥1 cm DBH), but the more enduring effects of this disturbance on the demography and spatial pattern of large‐diameter trees occurred during the post‐fire mortality regime. The combined effects of disturbance and biotic mortality agents provoked density‐dependent mortality among large‐diameter (≥60 cm DBH) trees, eliciting a distinct post‐disturbance mortality regime that did not resemble the pattern of either pre‐fire mortality or direct fire effects. The disproportionate ecological significance of the largest trees renders this mortality regime acutely consequential to the long‐term structure and function of forests.