Michela Gabelloni

Dr. Michela Gabelloni

Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 July 2021 in La radiologia medica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCamilla Scapicchio
Camilla Scapicchio
MGMichela Gabelloni
Michela Gabelloni
Andrea BarucciAndrea Barucci
Andrea Barucci
Dania CioniDania Cioni
Dania Cioni
Luca SabaLuca Saba
Luca Saba
ENEmanuele Neri
Emanuele Neri
Radiomics is a process that allows the extraction and analysis of quantitative data from medical images. It is an evolving field of research with many potential applications in medical imaging. The purpose of this review is to offer a deep look into radiomics, from the basis, deeply discussed from a technical point of view, through the main applications, to the challenges that have to be addressed to translate this process in clinical practice. A detailed description of the main techniques used in the various steps of radiomics workflow, which includes image acquisition, reconstruction, pre-processing, segmentation, features extraction and analysis, is here proposed, as well as an overview of the main promising results achieved in various applications, focusing on the limitations and possible solutions for clinical implementation. Only an in-depth and comprehensive description of current methods and applications can suggest the potential power of radiomics in fostering precision medicine and thus the care of patients, especially in cancer detection, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment evaluation.

27 July 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DVDiana Veiga-Canuto
Diana Veiga-Canuto
Leonor Cerdá AlberichLeonor Cerdá Alberich
Leonor Cerdá Alberich
CNCinta Sangüesa Nebot
Cinta Sangüesa Nebot
BHBlanca Martínez de Las Heras
Blanca Martínez de Las Heras
UPUlrike Potschger
Ulrike Potschger
Luis Martí-BonmatíLuis Martí-Bonmatí
Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Tumor segmentation is one of the key steps in imaging processing. The goals of this study were to assess the inter-observer variability in manual segmentation of neuroblastic tumors and to analyze whether the state-of-the-art deep learning architecture nnU-Net can provide a robust solution to detect and segment tumors on MR images. A retrospective multicenter study of 132 patients with neuroblastic tumors was performed. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC ROC) were used to compare segmentation sets. Two more metrics were elaborated to understand the direction of the errors: the modified version of False Positive (FPRm) and False Negative (FNR) rates. Two radiologists manually segmented 46 tumors and a comparative study was performed. nnU-Net was trained-tuned with 106 cases divided into five balanced folds to perform cross-validation. The five resulting models were used as an ensemble solution to measure training (n = 106) and validation (n = 26) performance, independently. The time needed by the model to automatically segment 20 cases was compared to the time required for manual segmentation. The median DSC for manual segmentation sets was 0.969 (±0.032 IQR). The median DSC for the automatic tool was 0.965 (±0.018 IQR). The automatic segmentation model achieved a better performance regarding the FPRm. MR images segmentation variability is similar between radiologists and nnU-Net. Time leverage when using the automatic model with posterior visual validation and manual adjustment corresponds to 92.8%.

23 April 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesca CoppolaFrancesca Coppola
Francesca Coppola
Valentina GianniniValentina Giannini
Valentina Giannini
MGMichela Gabelloni
Michela Gabelloni
JPJovana Panic
Jovana Panic
ADArianna Defeudis
Arianna Defeudis
Lorenzo FaggioniLorenzo Faggioni
Lorenzo Faggioni
While cross-sectional imaging has seen continuous progress and plays an undiscussed pivotal role in the diagnostic management and treatment planning of patients with rectal cancer, a largely unmet need remains for improved staging accuracy, assessment of treatment response and prediction of individual patient outcome. Moreover, the increasing availability of target therapies has called for developing reliable diagnostic tools for identifying potential responders and optimizing overall treatment strategy on a personalized basis. Radiomics has emerged as a promising, still fully evolving research topic, which could harness the power of modern computer technology to generate quantitative information from imaging datasets based on advanced data-driven biomathematical models, potentially providing an added value to conventional imaging for improved patient management. The present study aimed to illustrate the contribution that current radiomics methods applied to magnetic resonance imaging can offer to managing patients with rectal cancer.

3 November 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMichela Gabelloni
Michela Gabelloni
Lorenzo FaggioniLorenzo Faggioni
Lorenzo Faggioni
SASimona Attanasio
Simona Attanasio
VVVanina Vani
Vanina Vani
AGAntonio Goddi
Antonio Goddi
ENEmanuele Neri
Emanuele Neri
Our purpose is to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics analysis for differentiating between malignant and benign parotid neoplasms and, among the latter, between pleomorphic adenomas and Warthin tumors. We retrospectively evaluated 75 T2-weighted images of parotid gland lesions, of which 61 were benign tumors (32 pleomorphic adenomas, 23 Warthin tumors and 6 oncocytomas) and 14 were malignant tumors. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to find the threshold values for the most discriminative features and determine their sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The most discriminative features were used to train a support vector machine classifier. The best classification performance was obtained by comparing a pleomorphic adenoma with a Warthin tumor (yielding sensitivity, specificity and a diagnostic accuracy as high as 0.8695, 0.9062 and 0.8909, respectively) and a pleomorphic adenoma with malignant tumors (sensitivity, specificity and a diagnostic accuracy of 0.6666, 0.8709 and 0.8043, respectively). Radiomics analysis of parotid tumors on conventional T2-weighted MR images allows the discrimination of pleomorphic adenomas from Warthin tumors and malignant tumors with a high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.

4 February 2020 in La radiologia medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMichela Gabelloni
Michela Gabelloni
MNMatteo Di Nasso
Matteo Di Nasso
RMRiccardo Morganti
Riccardo Morganti
Lorenzo FaggioniLorenzo Faggioni
Lorenzo Faggioni
GMGianluca Masi
Gianluca Masi
ENEmanuele Neri
Emanuele Neri

4 March 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OCOrlando Catalano
Orlando Catalano
RFRoberta Fusco
Roberta Fusco
FMFederica De Muzio
Federica De Muzio
ISIgino Simonetti
Igino Simonetti
PPPierpaolo Palumbo
Pierpaolo Palumbo
VGVincenza Granata
Vincenza Granata
Breast ultrasound (US) has undergone dramatic technological improvement through recent decades, moving from a low spatial resolution, grayscale-limited technique to a highly performing, multiparametric modality. In this review, we first focus on the spectrum of technical tools that have become commercially available, including new microvasculature imaging modalities, high-frequency transducers, extended field-of-view scanning, elastography, contrast-enhanced US, MicroPure, 3D US, automated US, S-Detect, nomograms, images fusion, and virtual navigation. In the subsequent section, we discuss the broadened current application of US in breast clinical scenarios, distinguishing among primary US, complementary US, and second-look US. Finally, we mention the still ongoing limitations and the challenging aspects of breast US.