Dmitriy Matyushin

Mr. Dmitriy Matyushin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2020 in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDmitriy Matyushin
Dmitriy Matyushin
ASAnastasia Yu. Sholokhova
Anastasia Yu. Sholokhova
ABAleksey K. Buryak
Aleksey K. Buryak

1 December 2019 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDmitriy Matyushin
Dmitriy Matyushin
ASAnastasia Sholokhova
Anastasia Sholokhova
ABAleksey K. Buryak
Aleksey K. Buryak

15 December 2020 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDmitriy Matyushin
Dmitriy Matyushin
ABAleksey K. Buryak
Aleksey K. Buryak
Gas chromatography is a widely used method in analytical chemistry and metabolomics. Using gas chromatography, vaporizable compounds can be separated for their further identification. Retention indices are standardized values that depend only on a chemical structure of a compound and on a stationary phase and characterize the retention of a compound in a chromatographic system. Retention index prediction is an important task because databases contain experimental values for a small fraction of all possible molecules, while this information is usable for untargeted analysis. In this work, we consider four machine learning models for retention index prediction: 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks, deep residual multilayer perceptron, and gradient boosting. String representation of the molecule, 2D representation of the chemical structure, molecular descriptors and fingerprints, and molecular descriptors are used as inputs of these four models, respectively, along with information about the stationary phase. The first and third models show the best performance, while the other two perform slightly worse. The models predict retention index values for various standard and semi-standard non-polar stationary phases. Further improvement in performance was achieved using a linear model that uses the results of four previous models as inputs (model stacking). The models were tested using various diverse data sets: flavor compounds, essential oils, metabolomics-related compounds. Achieved accuracy: median absolute and percentage errors – 6-40 units and 0.8-2.2%. Accuracy depends on a test data set. The stacking model outperforms previously reported approaches for all test data sets. Parameters of a pre-trained model and some source code are provided.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDmitriy Matyushin
Dmitriy Matyushin
ASAnastasia Sholokhova
Anastasia Sholokhova
Aleksey Konstantinovich BuryakAleksey Konstantinovich Buryak
Aleksey Konstantinovich Buryak
Prediction of gas chromatographic retention indices based on compound structure is an important task for analytical chemistry. The predicted retention indices can be used as a reference in a mass spectrometry library search despite the fact that their accuracy is worse in comparison with the experimental reference ones. In the last few years, deep learning was applied for this task. The use of deep learning drastically improved the accuracy of retention index prediction for non-polar stationary phases. In this work, we demonstrate for the first time the use of deep learning for retention index prediction on polar (e.g., polyethylene glycol, DB-WAX) and mid-polar (e.g., DB-624, DB-210, DB-1701, OV-17) stationary phases. The achieved accuracy lies in the range of 16–50 in terms of the mean absolute error for several stationary phases and test data sets. We also demonstrate that our approach can be directly applied to the prediction of the second dimension retention times (GC × GC) if a large enough data set is available. The achieved accuracy is considerably better compared with the previous results obtained using linear quantitative structure-retention relationships and ACD ChromGenius software. The source code and pre-trained models are available online.

1 February 2019 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAleksey L. Milyushkin
Aleksey L. Milyushkin
KBKirill P. Birin
Kirill P. Birin
DMDmitriy Matyushin
Dmitriy Matyushin
ASAlexander V. Semeikin
Alexander V. Semeikin
SIStepan D. Iartsev
Stepan D. Iartsev
ABAleksey K. Buryak
Aleksey K. Buryak

1 July 2020 in Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDmitriy Matyushin
Dmitriy Matyushin
ASAnastasia Yu. Sholokhova
Anastasia Yu. Sholokhova
AKAnastasia E. Karnaeva
Anastasia E. Karnaeva
ABAleksey K. Buryak
Aleksey K. Buryak