Martin P. Paulus

Martin P. Paulus


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 May 2010 in Brain Structure and Function
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMartin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus
MSMurray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein
We review the literature on interoception as it relates to depression and anxiety, with a focus on belief, and alliesthesia. The connection between increased but noisy afferent interoceptive input, self-referential and belief-based states, and top-down modulation of poorly predictive signals is integrated into a neuroanatomical and processing model for depression and anxiety. The advantage of this conceptualization is the ability to specifically examine the interface between basic interoception, self-referential belief-based states, and enhanced top-down modulation to attenuate poor predictability. We conclude that depression and anxiety are not simply interoceptive disorders but are altered interoceptive states as a consequence of noisily amplified self-referential interoceptive predictive belief states.

1 August 2018 in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDeanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch
MAMatthew D. Albaugh
Matthew D. Albaugh
SAShelli Avenevoli
Shelli Avenevoli
LCLinda Chang
Linda Chang
DCDuncan B. Clark
Duncan B. Clark
KSKenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher
The Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study incorporates a comprehensive range of measures assessing predictors and outcomes related to both mental and physical health across childhood and adolescence. The workgroup developed a battery that would assess a comprehensive range of domains that address study aims while minimizing participant and family burden. We review the major considerations that went into deciding what constructs to cover in the demographics, physical health and mental health domains, as well as the process of selecting measures, piloting and refining the originally proposed battery. We present a description of the baseline battery, as well as the six-month interim assessments and the one-year follow-up assessments. This battery includes assessments from the perspectives of both the parent and the target youth, as well as teacher reports. This battery will provide a foundational baseline assessment of the youth's current function so as to permit characterization of stability and change in key domains over time. The findings from this battery will also be utilized to identify both resilience markers that predict healthy development and risk factors for later adverse outcomes in physical health, mental health, and substance use and abuse.

1 August 2003 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMartin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus
CRCorianne Rogalsky
Corianne Rogalsky
ASAlan Simmons
Alan Simmons
JFJustin S Feinstein
Justin S Feinstein
MSMurray B Stein
Murray B Stein

1 August 1998 in Archives of General Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LJLewis L. Judd
Lewis L. Judd
HAHagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal
JMJack D. Maser
Jack D. Maser
PZPamela J. Zeller
Pamela J. Zeller
JEJean Endicott
Jean Endicott
MKMartin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES of unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) by Angst et al1,2 and Keller et al3-5 have described relapse and chronicity of major depressive episode (MDE) during the course of MDD. Detailed characterization of the disease between MDEs has rarely been the focus of systematic investigation. Some information on clinical course has been gleaned indirectly from cross-sectional studies of MDD in which alternative depressive subtypes have been described, eg, dysthymic disorder,6 minor depressive disorder (MinD),7 double depression,8 recurrent brief depression,9 and subsyndromal or subthreshold depressive symptoms (SSDs).10-16

1 February 2012 in Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARobin L. Aupperle
Robin L. Aupperle
AMAndrew J. Melrose
Andrew J. Melrose
MSMurray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein
MPMartin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus

9 June 2015 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NFNorman Farb
Norman Farb
JDJennifer Daubenmier
Jennifer Daubenmier
CPCynthia J. Price
Cynthia J. Price
TGTim Gard
Tim Gard
CKCatherine Kerr
Catherine Kerr
WMWolf E. Mehling
Wolf E. Mehling
Interoception can be broadly defined as the sense of signals originating within the body. As such, interoception is critical for our sense of embodiment, motivation and well-being. And yet, despite its importance, interoception remains poorly understood within modern science. This paper reviews interdisciplinary perspectives on interoception, with the goal of presenting a unified perspective from diverse fields such as neuroscience, clinical practice, and contemplative studies. It is hoped that this integrative effort will advance our understanding of how interoception determines well-being, and identify the central challenges to such understanding. To this end, we introduce an expanded taxonomy of interoceptive processes, arguing that many of these processes can be understood through an emerging predictive coding model for mind-body integration. The model, which describes the tension between expected and felt body sensation, parallels contemplative theories, and implicates interoception in a variety of affective and psychosomatic disorders. We conclude that maladaptive construal of bodily sensations may lie at the heart of many contemporary maladies, and that contemplative practices may attenuate these interpretative biases, restoring a person’s sense of presence and agency in the world.