Chao Wang

Prof. Dr. Chao Wang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2024 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJun Li
Jun Li
XLXu Li
Xu Li
CWChao Wang
Chao Wang
JLJun-Zhuo Liu
Jun-Zhuo Liu
ZGZhan-Dong Gao
Zhan-Dong Gao
FZFei Zang
Fei Zang

21 December 2023 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CWChao Wang
Chao Wang
KLKaiming Li
Kaiming Li
CYChunxia Yuan
Chunxia Yuan

15 February 2025 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJun Li
Jun Li
CWChao Wang
Chao Wang
XTXin-Ying Tuo
Xin-Ying Tuo
RPRam Proshad
Ram Proshad
JLJun-Zhuo Liu
Jun-Zhuo Liu
FZFei Zang
Fei Zang



18 April 2026 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XNXiaoying Nie
Xiaoying Nie
CWChao Wang
Chao Wang
KLKaiming Li
Kaiming Li
WHWanzhuang Huang
Wanzhuang Huang
Rapid urbanization and agricultural expansion in arid regions have profoundly altered carbon cycles and landscape stability. Focusing on the Hexi Corridor, China, this study integrates multi-source geospatial data (1990–2020) to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of land-use carbon emissions (LUCE) and landscape ecological risks (LER). By integrating carbon accounting, LER assessment, bivariate spatial autocorrelation, and the Optimal Parameter Geographic Detector (OPGD), we quantify the intricate relationship between carbon dynamics and landscape integrity. Results indicate a transformative pattern of anthropogenic expansion and natural contraction, with a 2315.49 km2 net loss of unused land. Net carbon emissions surged 4.6-fold, while forest and grassland sinks exhibited a significant “lock-in effect” due to fragile ecological foundations. Simultaneously, LER followed an “inverted U-shaped” trajectory; the refined 5 × 5 km grid scale revealed a significant drop in high-risk areas from 44.65% to 10.96% following ecological restoration. Spatial analysis reveals a significant “spatial mismatch” between LUCE and LER, with oases manifesting “high carbon–low risk” clustering. Driver detection confirms a driving asymmetry. LUCE is dominated by anthropogenic factors (nighttime light, q > 0.90), whereas LER is profoundly constrained by natural backgrounds. Future governance must shift toward a collaborative system centered on source-based emission control and precise regional management to synergize low-carbon transition with landscape security.