The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is facilitated by the phosphorylation of H2AX, which organizes DNA damage signaling and chromatin remodeling complexes in the vicinity of the lesion (Pilch, D.R., O.A. Sedelnikova, C. Redon, A. Celeste, A. Nussenzweig, and W.M. Bonner. 2003. Biochem. Cell Biol. 81:123–129; Morrison, A.J., and X. Shen. 2005. Cell Cycle. 4:568–571; van Attikum, H., and S.M. Gasser. 2005. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:757–765). The disruption of DNA integrity induces an alteration of chromatin architecture that has been proposed to activate the DNA damage transducing kinase ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM; Bakkenist, C.J., and M.B. Kastan. 2003. Nature. 421:499–506). However, little is known about the physical properties of damaged chromatin. In this study, we use a photoactivatable version of GFP-tagged histone H2B to examine the mobility and structure of chromatin containing DSBs in living cells. We find that chromatin containing DSBs exhibits limited mobility but undergoes an energy-dependent local expansion immediately after DNA damage. The localized expansion observed in real time corresponds to a 30–40% reduction in the density of chromatin fibers in the vicinity of DSBs, as measured by energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy. The observed opening of chromatin occurs independently of H2AX and ATM. We propose that localized adenosine triphosphate–dependent decondensation of chromatin at DSBs establishes an accessible subnuclear environment that facilitates DNA damage signaling and repair.

Covalent histone modifications and the incorporation of histone variants bring about changes in chromatin structure that in turn alter gene expression. Interest in non-allelic histone variants has been renewed, in part because of recent work on H3 (and other) histone variants. However, only in mammals do three non-centromeric H3 variants (H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3) exist. Here, we show that mammalian cell lines can be separated into two different groups based on their expression of H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3 at both mRNA and protein levels. Additionally, the ratio of these variants changes slightly during neuronal differentiation of murine ES cells. This difference in H3 variant expression between cell lines could not be explained by changes in growth rate, cell cycle stages, or chromosomal ploidy, but rather suggests other possibilities, such as changes in H3 variant incorporation during differentiation and tissue- or species-specific H3 variant expression. Moreover, quantitative mass spectrometry analysis of human H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3 showed modification differences between these three H3 variants, suggesting that they may have different biological functions. Specifically, H3.3 contains marks associated with transcriptionally active chromatin, whereas H3.2, in contrast, contains mostly silencing modifications that have been associated with facultative heterochromatin. Interestingly, H3.1 is enriched in both active and repressive marks, although the latter marks are different from those observed in H3.2. Although the biological significance as to why mammalian cells differentially employ three highly similar H3 variants remains unclear, our results underscore potential functional differences between them and reinforce the general view that H3.1 and H3.2 in mammalian cells should not be treated as equivalent proteins.