A family history of ovarian or breast cancer is the strongest risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Germline deleterious variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer EOC risks by age 80, of 44% and 17% respectively. The mismatch repair genes, particularly MSH2 and MSH6, are also EOC susceptibility genes. Several other DNA repair genes, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and PALB2, have been identified as moderate risk EOC genes. EOC has five main histotypes; high-grade serous (HGS), low-grade serous (LGS), clear cell (CCC), endometrioid (END), and mucinous (MUC). This review examines the current understanding of the contribution of rare genetic variants to EOC, focussing on providing frequency data for each histotype. We provide an overview of frequency and risk for pathogenic variants in the known susceptibility genes as well as other proposed genes. We also describe the progress to-date to understand the role of missense variants and the different breast and ovarian cancer risks for each gene. Identification of susceptibility genes have clinical impact by reducing disease-associated mortality through improving risk prediction, with the possibility of prevention strategies, and developing new targeted treatments and these clinical implications are also discussed.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) and miR-182 expression with response to platinum-based chemotherapy and survival in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). We evaluated 78 women with HGSOC stages I-IV, diagnosed between 1996 and 2013, and followed up until 2016. DDR2 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray slides. The microRNAs were evaluated by qRT-PCR. DDR2 expression was high in 11 (14.1%) women. PFS was significantly lower in women with FIGO stage I/II – versus III/IV, post-surgery residual disease and high expression of DDR2. Women with postsurgery residual disease, FIGO stage I/II – versus III/IV and DDR2 expression had worse OS, but only post-surgery residual disease remained an independent prognostic factor for worse OS in multivariable analysis. miR-182 expression levels were significantly lower in patients harboring tumors with higher expression of DDR2 (p < 0.001). In this relatively large cohort of women with HSGOC, higher DDR2 expression was associated with lower miR-182 levels and worse PFS, suggesting that these molecules may be associated with mechanisms of HGSOC progression.

Extensive research on homologous-recombination-deficient (HRD) tumors has led to advancements in targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors (PARPis). Around 50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases exhibit HR deficiency, but understanding the remaining half, referred to as homologous-recombination-proficient (HRP) tumors, is limited. This review explores existing knowledge regarding HGSOC patients with HRP tumors and offers insights into potential targets for innovative treatments. Patients with HRP tumors do not experience the same benefits from PARPi and have poorer survival outcomes compared to those with HRD tumors. CCNE1 amplification is a common, well-established molecular feature in HGSOC HRP tumors, occurring in about 20% of cases. Targeting CCNE1 amplification and/or overexpression shows promise with emerging therapies like CDK2 or Wee1 inhibitors. Additionally, approaches using immunotherapy and antibody–drug conjugates could represent promising targets for HRP patients. This review also covers lesser-known molecular features in HRP tumors, such as fold-back inversions and CARM1 amplification and/or overexpression, as well as HRD tumors that acquire HR proficiency (BRCA1/2 reversion mutations, demethylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C). We also discuss controversial topics regarding HRP tumors and limitations of HRD detection. Addressing this need is critical to reduce toxicity and improve disease management.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is a tool used in precision oncology to identify genomic alterations and match them with targeted therapies across several tumor types. However, real-world data on its clinical utility and impact remains limited. The FRONTAL study (Foundation Medicine Real wOrld evideNce in porTugAL) is a multicenter academic initiative that established a national registry of Portuguese patients with solid tumors who underwent CGP with FoundationOne CDx, Liquid CDx or FoundationOne Heme assays. Methods: Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors not suitable for curative treatment at the time of recruitment. Prior CGP testing was permitted if taken within 12 months before study initiation. Genomic profiling data were extracted from FoundationOne Medicine reports, and clinical information was extracted from medical records. Actionable alterations were defined as those associated with approved treatments or with clinical evidence of benefit in other cancers, per NCCN guidelines. Variant interpretation was also reviewed according to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines. The primary outcome was disease control at 16 weeks, defined by the absence of progression. Results: The study included 205 patients between 2020 and 2025 across 10 sites, with colorectal (40, 19.5%), sarcomas (28, 13.7%), and other gastrointestinal tumors (22, 10.7%) being the most common pathologies. Actionable alterations were identified in 104 cases (50.7%). Genomic findings guided therapy decisions in 50 patients (24.4%), of whom 30 achieved disease control at 16 weeks (14.6%). Conclusions: The FRONTAL study highlighted the clinical relevance of CGP in advanced solid tumors. Over half of the patients had actionable alterations, a quarter had therapy changes based on CGP results, and improved disease outcome was observed in approximately 15% of the cohort.

Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is a tool used in precision oncology to identify genomic alterations and match them with targeted therapies across several tumor types. However, real-world data on its clinical utility and impact remains limited. The FRONTAL study (Foundation Medicine Real wOrld evideNce in porTugAL) is a multicenter academic initiative that established a national registry of Portuguese patients with solid tumors who underwent CGP with FoundationOne CDx, Liquid CDx or FoundationOne Heme assays. Methods: Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors not suitable for curative treatment at the time of recruitment. Prior CGP testing was permitted if taken within 12 months before study initiation. Genomic profiling data were extracted from FoundationOne Medicine reports, and clinical information was extracted from medical records. Actionable alterations were defined as those associated with approved treatments or with clinical evidence of benefit in other cancers, per NCCN guidelines. Variant interpretation was also reviewed according to ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines. The primary outcome was disease control at 16 weeks, defined by the absence of progression. Results: The study included 205 patients between 2020 and 2025 across 10 sites, with colorectal (40, 19.5%), sarcomas (28, 13.7%), and other gastrointestinal tumors (22, 10.7%) being the most common pathologies. Actionable alterations were identified in 104 cases (50.7%). Genomic findings guided therapy decisions in 50 patients (24.4%), of whom 30 achieved disease control at 16 weeks (14.6%). Conclusions: The FRONTAL study highlighted the clinical relevance of CGP in advanced solid tumors. Over half of the patients had actionable alterations, a quarter had therapy changes based on CGP results, and improved disease outcome was observed in approximately 15% of the cohort.