Pim Drinkenburg

Prof. Dr. Pim Drinkenburg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Clinical Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Claudio BabiloniClaudio Babiloni
Claudio Babiloni
RBRobert J. Barry
Robert J. Barry
EBErol Başar
Erol Başar
KBKatarzyna J. Blinowska
Katarzyna J. Blinowska
ACAndrzej Cichocki
Andrzej Cichocki
MHMark Hallett
Mark Hallett
In 1999, the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) published "IFCN Guidelines for topographic and frequency analysis of EEGs and EPs" (Nuwer et al., 1999). Here a Workgroup of IFCN experts presents unanimous recommendations on the following procedures relevant for the topographic and frequency analysis of resting state EEGs (rsEEGs) in clinical research defined as neurophysiological experimental studies carried out in neurological and psychiatric patients: (1) recording of rsEEGs (environmental conditions and instructions to participants; montage of the EEG electrodes; recording settings); (2) digital storage of rsEEG and control data; (3) computerized visualization of rsEEGs and control data (identification of artifacts and neuropathological rsEEG waveforms); (4) extraction of "synchronization" features based on frequency analysis (band-pass filtering and computation of rsEEG amplitude/power density spectrum); (5) extraction of "connectivity" features based on frequency analysis (linear and nonlinear measures); (6) extraction of "topographic" features (topographic mapping; cortical source mapping; estimation of scalp current density and dura surface potential; cortical connectivity mapping), and (7) statistical analysis and neurophysiological interpretation of those rsEEG features. As core outcomes, the IFCN Workgroup endorsed the use of the most promising "synchronization" and "connectivity" features for clinical research, carefully considering the limitations discussed in this paper. The Workgroup also encourages more experimental (i.e. simulation studies) and clinical research within international initiatives (i.e., shared software platforms and databases) facing the open controversies about electrode montages and linear vs. nonlinear and electrode vs. source levels of those analyses.

1 October 2010 in Biological Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAndrew Haddon Kemp
Andrew Haddon Kemp
KGK. Griffiths
K. Griffiths
KFK.L. Felmingham
K.L. Felmingham
SSS.A. Shankman
S.A. Shankman
PDPim Drinkenburg
Pim Drinkenburg
RBR.A. Bryant
R.A. Bryant

1 July 1992 in Epilepsy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACA.M.L. Coenen
A.M.L. Coenen
PDPim Drinkenburg
Pim Drinkenburg
MIM. Inoue
M. Inoue
ELE.L.J.M. van Luijtelaar
E.L.J.M. van Luijtelaar

1 October 2012 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMartijn Arns
Martijn Arns
PDPim Drinkenburg
Pim Drinkenburg
PFPaul B Fitzgerald
Paul B Fitzgerald
JKJ. Leon Kenemans
J. Leon Kenemans

1 August 2004 in Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHester van Lier
Hester van Lier
PDPim Drinkenburg
Pim Drinkenburg
YEYvonne J.W van Eeten
Yvonne J.W van Eeten
ACAnton M.L Coenen
Anton M.L Coenen

12 October 2012 in Neuropsychobiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarc Jobert
Marc Jobert
FWFrederick J. Wilson
Frederick J. Wilson
GRGé S.F. Ruigt
Gé S.F. Ruigt
MBMartin Brunovsky
Martin Brunovsky
LPLeslie S. Prichep
Leslie S. Prichep
TCThe IPEG Pharmaco-EEG Guideline Committee
The IPEG Pharmaco-EEG Guideline Committee
The International Pharmaco-EEG Society (IPEG) presents updated guidelines summarising the requirements for the recording and computerised evaluation of pharmaco-EEG data in man. Since the publication of the first pharmaco-EEG guidelines in 1982, technical and data processing methods have advanced steadily, thus enhancing data quality and expanding the palette of tools available to investigate the action of drugs on the central nervous system (CNS), determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of novel therapeutics and evaluate the CNS penetration or toxicity of compounds. However, a review of the literature reveals inconsistent operating procedures from one study to another. While this fact does not invalidate results per se, the lack of standardisation constitutes a regrettable shortcoming, especially in the context of drug development programmes. Moreover, this shortcoming hampers reliable comparisons between outcomes of studies from different laboratories and hence also prevents pooling of data which is a requirement for sufficiently powering the validation of novel analytical algorithms and EEG-based biomarkers. The present updated guidelines reflect the consensus of a global panel of EEG experts and are intended to assist investigators using pharmaco-EEG in clinical research, by providing clear and concise recommendations and thereby enabling standardisation of methodology and facilitating comparability of data across laboratories.