Scaffold-guided bone regeneration is poised to revolutionize the management of critical-sized bone defects. However, translation into clinical practice has been hampered by the focus on bioresorbable scaffolds where the rate of degradation needs to match the rate of bone formation and metal plates are required to overcome their mechanical limitations. Metal plates are problematic because they cause stress shielding and X-ray perturbation, increasing the likelihood of hardware failure and interfering with post-operative radiotherapy and imaging. Segmental defects of the mandible are challenging due to high tensile and shear stresses encountered during mastication, with the ovine mandible especially vexing because of the high repetitive loads. Here we show long-term reconstruction of ovine segmental mandibulectomy defects using a permanent, patient-matched, numerically optimized, 3D-printed, thermally toughened, plasma-treated, and laser-sintered polyetherketone gyroid scaffold housing a resorbable ceramic lattice infused with a stem cell laden hydrogel serving as an osteoinductive reservoir of calcium. The durable clinical performance observed indicates a translatable alternative to traditional reconstruction using bone grafts with metal plate fixation.

Long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes following mandibular and maxillary reconstruction are lacking. To determine these outcomes, a cross-sectional study of patients with a history of cancer who underwent jaw reconstruction was undertaken. Participants were identified from a database of jaw reconstruction procedures at the Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (Sydney, Australia). Eligible patients had at least one month follow-up, were aged ≥18 years at surgery, and had history of malignancy. HRQOL was measured using the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module (FACE-Q H&N). Functional outcomes were measured using the FACE-Q H&N, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and Speech Handicap Index (SHI). Ninety-seven questionnaires were completed (62% response rate). Mean age of respondents was 63.7 years, 61% were male, and 64% underwent radiotherapy. Treatment with radiotherapy was associated with worse outcomes across 10/14 FACE-Q H&N scales, three MDADI subscales and one composite score, and the SHI. Mean differences in scores between irradiated and non-irradiated patients exceeded clinically meaningful differences for the MDADI and SHI. Issues with oral competence, saliva, speaking, and swallowing worsened with increasing time since surgery. Younger patients reported greater concerns with appearance, smiling, speaking, and cancer worry. Women reported greater concerns regarding appearance and associated distress. History of radiotherapy substantially impacts HRQOL and function after jaw reconstruction. Age at surgery and gender were also predictors of outcomes and associated distress. Pre-treatment counselling of patients requiring jaw reconstruction may lead to improved survivorship for patients with head and neck cancer.

Background: The Jaw‐in‐a‐Day (JIAD) procedure aims to achieve immediate functional occlusion via a single‐stage approach to maxillofacial reconstruction. While JIAD has gained popularity since its inception by Levine and colleagues, efficacy and outcome data remain limited. In this report, we discuss our experience with the JIAD technique at an Australian tertiary referral centre. Methods: A retrospective review of all JIAD procedures performed from April 2022 to December 2023 was conducted. Clinicopathologic data reviewed included demographic information, primary diagnosis, anatomical site of disease, and history of pre‐operative radiotherapy. Outcome measures of interest included operative time, number of implants placed, post‐operative complications and implant survival. Results: Nineteen patients were identified for the study. Two maxillary and 17 mandibular JIAD procedures were performed. The most common indications were squamous cell carcinoma ( n = 8) and ameloblastoma ( n = 5). Surgical complications included recipient site wound infection ( n = 3), flap dehiscence ( n = 2), haematoma formation ( n = 1), and neck abscess associated with partial flap failure ( n = 1). No total flap failures were identified. Of the 55 total implants placed, one implant failure occurred 2‐months post‐operatively. No loss of irradiated implants ( n = 21) was observed. The median time to adjuvant radiotherapy was 57 days (range, 32–61). Eighteen of 19 patients (95%) achieved immediate dental rehabilitation, and 15/19 patients (79%) retained a functional prosthesis by the end of the follow‐up period. Conclusions: Our series supports the feasibility of single‐stage reconstruction for both benign and malignant indications. Further research is required to understand the long‐term functional, aesthetic, and health‐related quality‐of‐life outcomes with the JIAD technique.

Background: The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of immediate implant placement for dental rehabilitation following mandibular reconstruction with vascularised bone flaps in a single Australian tertiary cancer centre.Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent immediate dental implant or delayed placement in vascularised bone flaps was performed. Primary outcome measures assessed included the number of implants placed, operative time, complication rates, time to radiotherapy initiation, dental rehabilitation rates and time to dental rehabilitation.Results: In total, 187 dental implants were placed in 52 patients, of which 34 patients underwent immediate implant placement and 18 had delayed implant placement. There were no significant differences in the postoperative complication rate (32% immediate vs. 33% delayed, P = 0.89) or time to postoperative radiotherapy (median 42 days immediate vs. 47 days delayed, P = 0.24). Dental rehabilitation was achieved in 62% of the immediate cohort versus 78% of the delayed cohort. The time to be fitted with a dental prosthesis was significantly shorter in the immediate cohort (median 150 days immediate vs. 843 days delayed, P = 0.002).Conclusions: The placement of immediate dental implants at the time of primary reconstruction of the mandible is a safe procedure and facilitates timely dental rehabilitation.