Dror Paley

Dr. Dror Paley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 1994 in Orthopedic Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKevin Tetsworth
Kevin Tetsworth
DPDror Paley
Dror Paley

1 November 2002 in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDror Paley
Dror Paley
JHJohn E. Herzenberg
John E. Herzenberg
The treatment of intramedullary infections after nailing usually includes removal of the rod, debridement of the canal, and, in many cases, insertion of antibiotic-impregnated cement beads. These beads offer no mechanical support and are difficult to remove if left in place for more than 2 weeks. We present an alternative for filling the medullary canal's noncollapsible dead space with an antibiotic-impregnated cement rod. This rod can be custom-made at the time of surgery, using different diameter chest tubes as molds and embedding a 3-mm beaded guidewire within the cement. The smooth molded surface of this nail makes extraction of the cement rod relatively easy. The cement rod also provides some limited temporary support to the fracture or nonunion site while the infection is being treated. After 6 weeks, the rod can be removed and replaced with a definitive metal intramedullary nail, with or without bone grafting to treat the previously infected fracture or nonunion site. We retrospectively reviewed nine cases of intramedullary infection treated with antibiotic-impregnated molded cement rods. These included six femora, two tibiae, and one humerus. The cause of infection was lengthening or transport over nail in six cases, fixator-augmented nailing of osteotomies in two, and fracture fixation in one. The follow-up period after surgery ranged from 38 to 48 months. No recurrent infection occurred during this follow-up period, and no patient required antibiotics after the rod was removed. In all cases, the canal cultures were negative after rod removal. The cement rod was removed between 29 and 753 days after implantation. Fracture of the rod occurred in one case in which the rod was left in place for more than 1 year. We conclude that this method is a relatively simple and inexpensive alternative for the treatment of intramedullary infections.

1 August 2003 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MNMonica Paschoal Nogueira
Monica Paschoal Nogueira
DPDror Paley
Dror Paley
ABAnil Bhave
Anil Bhave
AHAndrew Herbert
Andrew Herbert
CNCatherine Nocente
Catherine Nocente
JHJohn E. Herzenberg
John E. Herzenberg
Background:Nerve injury is one of the most serious complications associated with limb-lengthening. We examined the risk, assessment, and treatment of nerve lesions associated with limb-lengthening.Methods:We retrospectively studied the records on 814 limb-lengthening procedures. Nerve lesions were d


1 April 2019 in Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPDror Paley
Dror Paley
Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is likely to be a primary periosteal disease and secondary bone disease. The primary goal of treatment is to obtain union, correct the diaphyseal deformity, correct any proximal fibular migration and prevent refracture. The pathobiology demonstrates increased osteoclasis by the surrounding fibrous hamartoma and reduced osteogenesis and bone morphogenic protein production by the bone. This leads to a loss of remodelling potential and gradual bowing and atrophy of the bone with eventual fracture of the tibia and or fibula. This recommends the synergistic use of bisphosphonates and bone morphogenic protein. The pathomechanics of CPT implicate the anterolateral bowing, narrow diameter of the atrophic bone ends and proximal fibular migration. These biomechanical factors can be addressed by means of straightening of the deformity, intramedullary support of both bones, stable fixation and reduction of proximal migration of the fibula. A summary of the literature on CPT shows that the mean probability of achieving primary union without refracture, by most treatments is 50% (12% to 80%). Two recent studies have shown a much higher success rate approaching 100%, by creating a cross-union between the tibia and fibula. The cross-union with intramedullary reinforcement of the bone makes refracture unlikely due to the cross-sectional area of union with its two-bar linkage. A new classification to guide such treatment is also proposed. Level of Evidence: V – expert opinion

1 February 2005 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDimitris Katsenis
Dimitris Katsenis
ABAnil Bhave
Anil Bhave
DPDror Paley
Dror Paley
JHJohn E. Herzenberg
John E. Herzenberg
Background: Malunion and nonunion of an ankle fusion site are associated with pain, osteomyelitis, limb-length discrepancy, and deformity. The Ilizarov reconstruction has been used to treat these challenging problems.