Temperature is an important environmental factor influencing plant development in natural and diseased conditions. The growth rate of plants grown at 27°C is more rapid than for plants grown at 21°C. Thus, temperature affects the rate of pathogenesis progression in individual plants. We have analyzed the effect of temperature conditions (either 21°C or 27°C during the day) on the accumulation rate of the virus and satellite RNA (satRNA) in Nicotiana benthamiana plants infected by peanut stunt virus (PSV) with and without its satRNA, at four time points. In addition, we extracted proteins from PSV and PSV+satRNA-infected plants harvested at 21 dpi, when disease symptoms began to appear on plants grown at 21°C and were well developed on those grown at 27°C, to assess the proteome profile in infected plants compared to mock-inoculated plants grown at these two temperatures, using 2D-gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry approaches. The accumulation rate of the viral RNAs and satRNA was more rapid at 27°C at the beginning of the infection and then rapidly decreased in PSV-infected plants. At 21 dpi, PSV and satRNA accumulation was higher at 21°C and had a tendency to increase further. In all studied plants grown at 27°C, we observed a significant drop in the identified proteins participating in photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism at the proteome level, in comparison to plants maintained at 21°C. On the other hand, the proteins involved in protein metabolic processes were all more abundant in plants grown at 27°C. This was especially evident when PSV-infected plants were analyzed, where increase in abundance of proteins involved in protein synthesis, degradation, and folding was revealed. In mock-inoculated and PSV-infected plants we found an increase in abundance of the majority of stress-related differently-regulated proteins and those associated with protein metabolism. In contrast, in PSV+satRNA-infected plants the shift in the temperature barely increased the level of stress-related proteins.

In higher plants, evolutionarily conserved processes playing an essential role during gene expression rely on small noncoding RNA molecules (sRNA). Within a wide range of sRNA-dependent cellular events, there is posttranscriptional gene silencing, the process that is activated in response to the presence of double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) in planta. The sequence-specific mechanism of silencing is based on RNase-mediated trimming of dsRNAs into translationally inactive short molecules. Viruses invading and replicating in host are also a source of dsRNAs and are recognized as such by cellular posttranscriptional silencing machinery leading to degradation of the pathogenic RNA. However, viruses are not totally defenseless. In parallel with evolving plant defense strategies, viruses have managed a wide range of multifunctional proteins that efficiently impede the posttranscriptional gene silencing. These viral counteracting factors are known as suppressors of RNA silencing. The aim of this review is to summarize the role and the mode of action of several functionally characterized RNA silencing suppressors encoded by RNA viruses directly involved in plant–pathogen interactions. Additionally, we point out that the widely diverse functions, structures, and modes of action of viral suppressors can be performed by different proteins, even in related viruses. All those adaptations have been evolved to achieve the same goal: to maximize the rate of viral genetic material replication by interrupting the evolutionary conserved plant defense mechanism of posttranscriptional gene silencing.

‘Torrado’ disease caused by tomato torrado virus (ToTV) is responsible for considerable losses in tomato production. Therefore, a one-step reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification protocol for early and fast detection of ToTV isolates has been developed. The RNA extracted from ToTV-infected plants was tested using this protocol with a set of six primers specific for the Vp35 coat protein gene sequence. The amplified products were analyzed using amplification curves, electrophoresis, and direct staining of DNA. The sensitivity of the protocol was tenfold higher than that of conventional RT-PCR. This new protocol is inexpensive, rapid, simple, and very sensitive.