Maria Barbati

Dr. Maria Barbati


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2012 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMaria Barbati
Maria Barbati
GBG. Bruno
G. Bruno
AGAndrea Genovese
Andrea Genovese

30 July 2020 in Annals of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMiguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios
Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios
JCJuan Cabarcas-Reyes
Juan Cabarcas-Reyes
Alessio IshizakaAlessio Ishizaka
Alessio Ishizaka
MBMaria Barbati
Maria Barbati
NJNatalia Jaramillo-Rueda
Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda
GCGiovani de Jesús Carrascal-Zambrano
Giovani de Jesús Carrascal-Zambrano

27 October 2015 in Optimization Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMaria Barbati
Maria Barbati
CPCarmela Piccolo
Carmela Piccolo

1 July 2018 in Omega
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMaria Barbati
Maria Barbati
SGSalvatore Greco
Salvatore Greco
Milosz KadzinskiMilosz Kadzinski
Milosz Kadzinski
RSRoman Słowiński
Roman Słowiński

23 February 2022 in Journal of the Operational Research Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FGFattoruso Gerarda
Fattoruso Gerarda
MBMaria Barbati
Maria Barbati
Alessio IshizakaAlessio Ishizaka
Alessio Ishizaka
MSMassimo Squillante
Massimo Squillante
There are several manufacturing errors of different criticality, severity, and occurrence. Correcting all of them is difficult and costly. In this paper, we propose a new hybrid approach to classifying manufacturing errors in an automotive plant and, consequently, to selecting the portfolio of processes that require more attention from the management of the company. Our approach consists of two steps. Firstly, we classify the errors in terms of priority, based on a set of criteria agreed with the management, using the multi-criteria decision-aiding method AHPSort II. The errors belonging to the highest priority class are the most urgent and critical for the company. Secondly, we define a multi-objective portfolio problem, selecting a set of the most critical processes based on the number of errors in each of these processes and on their priority. We adopted an interactive method for finding the most preferred portfolio of processes according to the stakeholder preferences. We applied this approach to a case study of the largest automotive company in Italy, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, showing how classical quality control tools can benefit from the integration of multi-criteria decision-aiding techniques.

1 June 2021 in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMichele Sarnataro
Michele Sarnataro
MBMaria Barbati
Maria Barbati
SGSalvatore Greco
Salvatore Greco