Tyler Kybartas

Dr. Tyler Kybartas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
AWAaron Wood
Aaron Wood
VNVincenzo G. Nocera
Vincenzo G. Nocera
TKTyler Kybartas
Tyler Kybartas
DCDawn Podulka Coe
Dawn Podulka Coe
Previous research showed a positive relationship between physical activity and self-regulation in older children and adolescents, but few publications focused on young children. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to examine the impact of physical activity (PA) on the cognitive aspects of self-regulation (inhibition, attention, and working memory, in preschool-aged (3–6 years old) children. The following databases were searched for articles: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, and ERIC. References of the reviewed papers were screened for the identification of additional articles to be included in the review. Randomized control trials were reviewed to assess the impact of PA interventions on the cognitive aspects of self-regulation. There were six articles included in this review. Each study assessed at least one cognitive aspect of self-regulation [attention (n = 4), working memory (n = 2), and inhibition (n = 5)]. Attention was the only aspect that consistently showed improvement as a result of the PA interventions (4 of 4 studies). Only one study showed a positive impact on working memory and 60% of studies (3 of 5 studies) reported a positive relationship between PA and inhibition. Overall, the findings from this review showed that a consistent relationship only existed between attention and PA. No clear relationships were evident between working memory and inhibition and PA.

10 June 2019 in Early Child Development and Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTyler Kybartas
Tyler Kybartas
JOJennifer F. Oody.
Jennifer F. Oody.
JFJeffrey T. Fairbrother
Jeffrey T. Fairbrother
RDR. Sean Durham
R. Sean Durham
DCDawn P. Coe
Dawn P. Coe
This study examined whether associations exist between PA intensity, self-regulation, and indicators of school readiness, a proxy for academic achievement, in young children. Thirty young children completed assessments of physical activity, school readiness indicators, and self-regulation. Physical activity intensity was classified as light, moderate or vigorous. School readiness indicators were assessed using expressive and receptive subtests. There were no associations between light and moderate physical activity, school readiness indicators, and self-regulation. Additionally, there was no association between vigorous activity and the receptive subtest of the school readiness indicators. Correlations were significant between vigorous activity, self-regulation, and expressive subtest. School indicator expressive scores and self-regulation were significantly predicted by the level of vigorous activity. Results suggest the existence of an intensity threshold influencing the PA, self-regulation, and school readiness association.

7 December 2022 in Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VNVincenzo Nocera
Vincenzo Nocera
TKTyler Kybartas
Tyler Kybartas
AWAngela Wozencroft
Angela Wozencroft
DCDawn Podulka Coe
Dawn Podulka Coe
Youth with developmental disabilities (DD) face challenges that may impact their participation in physical activity. One of the biggest challenges is the availability of opportunities to engage in activities that are adapted for youth with DD. In addition, due to challenges with current physical activity assessment methods for youth with DD, the activity levels during modified activities remain unclear. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the activity levels of youth with DD during structured and unstructured activities offered during a therapeutic camp. This camp was a five-day, overnight experience in an outdoor camp center in the southeastern region of the U.S. Youth (n = 29; 14.6 ± 3.9 years) with more than one DD and with varying abilities wore accelerometers while they engaged in 13 activities of varying categories (functional/gross motor, game, sociodramatic, fine motor, free play) and contexts (ropes, horses, outdoor adventure, music and movement, yoga, come on down, sports and games, theatre, cabin challenge, arts, cooking, mad science, free play). Activity level varied by activity category and context and the intensity level of the majority of the camp activities was classified as either sedentary or light. There was a time course effect on activity; most activities resulted in a gradual decline over the session, except for cooking, sports and games, and free play. This therapeutic camp provided an opportunity for youth to engage in physical activity that would be classified as light intensity. The activities available at this camp were designed to address specific goals and objectives and provided enrichment opportunities (e.g., life skills, social skills) for youth to obtain multiple skills while using movement as a framework to deliver the content.

1 May 2023 in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTyler Kybartas
Tyler Kybartas
PFPaula-Marie M. Ferrara
Paula-Marie M. Ferrara
DCDawn P. Coe
Dawn P. Coe
The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence, varieties, and motivations behind parent-selected incentivization for children's physical activity (PA). Parents ( n = 90; 30.0 ± 8.5 years) of children (8.7 ± 2.1 years) completed a web-based survey that included items regarding the use of PA rewards, children's moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA, min·week−1), access to electronic devices, and demographic characteristics. Open-ended questions were used to determine the type of activity rewarded, type of reward given, and parents’ reasoning for not using PA rewards. Independent sample t-tests were used to determine differences between reward groups (reward and no reward) and parent-reported children's MVPA. Open-ended responses underwent thematic analysis. Over half (55%) of the respondents provided PA rewards. There was no difference between reward groups for MVPA. Parents reported their children having access to various technology modes, including TV, tablets, video game systems, computers, and cellphones. Most of the parents (78.2%) reported restricting their child's technology time in some capacity. Rewarded PAs were thematized as “children responsibilities”, “non-sport activity”, and “sport”. Two themes regarding types of rewards included “tangible” and “nontangible”. Two underlying themes as to why parents did not give rewards were deemed “built-in-habit” and “enjoyment”. Rewarding children's PA is prevalent among this sample of parents. Substantial variety exists regarding the type of PA incentivized and the type of reward provided. Future studies should explore whether parents use reward structures and how they conceptualize nontangible, electronics-based rewards versus tangible rewards to incentivize children's PA to promote lifelong behavior.