Athena Demertzi

Dr. Athena Demertzi

Physiology of Cognition, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, Belgium

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2014 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJohan Stender
Johan Stender
OGOlivia Gosseries
Olivia Gosseries
MBMarie-Aurélie Bruno
Marie-Aurélie Bruno
VCVanessa Charland-Verville
Vanessa Charland-Verville
AVAudrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
SLSteven Laureys
Steven Laureys

1 February 2019 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAthena Demertzi
Athena Demertzi
ETEnzo Tagliazucchi
Enzo Tagliazucchi
SDS. Dehaene
S. Dehaene
GDGustavo Deco
Gustavo Deco
PBP. Barttfeld
P. Barttfeld
JSJ. D. Sitt
J. D. Sitt
Dynamic patterns of brain activity at rest distinguish conscious and unconscious states in humans.

27 June 2015 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAthena Demertzi
Athena Demertzi
GAGeorgios Antonopoulos
Georgios Antonopoulos
LHLizette Heine
Lizette Heine
HVHenning U. Voss
Henning U. Voss
JCJulia Sophia Crone
Julia Sophia Crone
SLSteven Laureys
Steven Laureys
Despite advances in resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging investigations, clinicians remain with the challenge of how to implement this paradigm on an individualized basis. Here, we assessed the clinical relevance of resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions in patients with disorders of consciousness by means of a systems-level approach. Three clinical centres collected data from 73 patients in minimally conscious state, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and coma. The main analysis was performed on the data set coming from one centre (Liège) including 51 patients (26 minimally conscious state, 19 vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, six coma; 15 females; mean age 49 ± 18 years, range 11-87; 16 traumatic, 32 non-traumatic of which 13 anoxic, three mixed; 35 patients assessed >1 month post-insult) for whom the clinical diagnosis with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised was congruent with positron emission tomography scanning. Group-level functional connectivity was investigated for the default mode, frontoparietal, salience, auditory, sensorimotor and visual networks using a multiple-seed correlation approach. Between-group inferential statistics and machine learning were used to identify each network's capacity to discriminate between patients in minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Data collected from 22 patients scanned in two other centres (Salzburg: 10 minimally conscious state, five vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; New York: five minimally conscious state, one vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, one emerged from minimally conscious state) were used to validate the classification with the selected features. Coma Recovery Scale-Revised total scores correlated with key regions of each network reflecting their involvement in consciousness-related processes. All networks had a high discriminative capacity (>80%) for separating patients in a minimally conscious state and vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Among them, the auditory network was ranked the most highly. The regions of the auditory network which were more functionally connected in patients in minimally conscious state compared to vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome encompassed bilateral auditory and visual cortices. Connectivity values in these three regions discriminated congruently 20 of 22 independently assessed patients. Our findings point to the significance of preserved abilities for multisensory integration and top-down processing in minimal consciousness seemingly supported by auditory-visual crossmodal connectivity, and promote the clinical utility of the resting paradigm for single-patient diagnostics.

1 March 2011 in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAudrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
ADAthena Demertzi
Athena Demertzi
Manuel SchabusManuel Schabus
Manuel Schabus
QNQuentin Noirhomme
Quentin Noirhomme
SBSerge Bredart
Serge Bredart
SLSteven Laureys
Steven Laureys
Evidence from functional neuroimaging studies on resting state suggests that there are two distinct anticorrelated cortical systems that mediate conscious awareness: an “extrinsic” system that encompasses lateral fronto-parietal areas and has been linked with processes of external input (external awareness), and an “intrinsic” system which encompasses mainly medial brain areas and has been associated with internal processes (internal awareness). The aim of our study was to explore the neural correlates of resting state by providing behavioral and neuroimaging data from healthy volunteers. With no a priori assumptions, we first determined behaviorally the relationship between external and internal awareness in 31 subjects. We found a significant anticorrelation between external and internal awareness with a mean switching frequency of 0.05 Hz (range: 0.01–0.1 Hz). Interestingly, this frequency is similar to BOLD fMRI slow oscillations. We then evaluated 22 healthy volunteers in an fMRI paradigm looking for brain areas where BOLD activity correlated with “internal” and “external” scores. Activation of precuneus/posterior cingulate, anterior cingulate/mesiofrontal cortices, and parahippocampal areas (“intrinsic system”) was linearly linked to intensity of internal awareness, whereas activation of lateral fronto-parietal cortices (“extrinsic system”) was linearly associated with intensity of external awareness.

1 April 2014 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAurore Thibaut
Aurore Thibaut
MBMarie-Aurélie Bruno
Marie-Aurélie Bruno
DLDidier Ledoux
Didier Ledoux
ADAthena Demertzi
Athena Demertzi
SLSteven Laureys
Steven Laureys
We assessed the effects of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (DLPF-tDCS) on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores in severely brain-damaged patients with disorders of consciousness. In a double-blind sham-controlled crossover design, anodal and sham tDCS were delivered in randomized order over the left DLPF cortex for 20 minutes in patients in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) or in a minimally conscious state (MCS) assessed at least 1 week after acute traumatic or nontraumatic insult. Clinical assessments were performed using the CRS-R directly before and after anodal and sham tDCS stimulation. Follow-up outcome data were acquired 12 months after inclusion using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Patients in MCS (n = 30; interval 43 ± 63 mo; 19 traumatic, 11 nontraumatic) showed a significant treatment effect (p = 0.003) as measured by CRS-R total scores. In patients with VS/UWS (n = 25; interval 24 ± 48 mo; 6 traumatic, 19 nontraumatic), no treatment effect was observed (p = 0.952). Thirteen (43%) patients in MCS and 2 (8%) patients in VS/UWS further showed postanodal tDCS-related signs of consciousness, which were observed neither during the pre-tDCS evaluation nor during the pre- or post-sham evaluation (i.e., tDCS responders). Outcome did not differ between tDCS responders and nonresponders. tDCS over left DLPF cortex may transiently improve signs of consciousness in MCS following severe brain damage as measured by changes in CRS-R total scores. This study provides Class II evidence that short-duration tDCS of the left DLPF cortex transiently improves consciousness as measured by CRS-R assessment in patients with MCS.

1 July 2016 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPCarol Di Perri
Carol Di Perri
MBMohamed Ali Bahri
Mohamed Ali Bahri
EAEnrico Amico
Enrico Amico
ATAurore Thibaut
Aurore Thibaut
LHLizette Heine
Lizette Heine
SLSteven Laureys
Steven Laureys