Costanza Bonadonna

Prof. Costanza Bonadonna

University of Geneva
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGholamhossein Bagheri
Gholamhossein Bagheri
CBCostanza Bonadonna
Costanza Bonadonna

26 January 2005 in Bulletin of Volcanology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCostanza Bonadonna
Costanza Bonadonna
BHB. F. Houghton
B. F. Houghton

1 January 2015 in Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGholamhossein Bagheri
Gholamhossein Bagheri
CBCostanza Bonadonna
Costanza Bonadonna
Irene ManzellaIrene Manzella
Irene Manzella
PVP. Vonlanthen
P. Vonlanthen

1 January 2012 in Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBR.J. Brown
R.J. Brown
CBCostanza Bonadonna
Costanza Bonadonna
ADA.J. Durant
A.J. Durant

1 May 1998 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBCostanza Bonadonna
Costanza Bonadonna
GEG.G.J. Ernst
G.G.J. Ernst
RSR.S.J. Sparks
R.S.J. Sparks

1 May 2012 in Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCostanza Bonadonna
Costanza Bonadonna
ACAntonio Costa
Antonio Costa
Volume determination of tephra deposits is necessary for the assessment of the dynamics and hazards of explosive volcanoes. Several methods have been proposed during the past 40 years that include the analysis of crystal concentration of large pumices, integrations of various thinning relationships, and the inversion of field observations using analytical and computational models. Regardless of their strong dependence on tephra-deposit exposure and distribution of isomass/isopach contours, empirical integrations of deposit thinning trends still represent the most widely adopted strategy due to their practical and fast application. The most recent methods involve the best fitting of thinning data using various exponential segments or a power-law curve on semilog plots of thickness (or mass/area) versus square root of isopach area. The exponential method is mainly sensitive to the number and the choice of straight segments, whereas the power-law method can better reproduce the natural thinning of tephra deposits but is strongly sensitive to the proximal or distal extreme of integration. We analyze a large data set of tephra deposits and propose a new empirical method for the determination of tephra-deposit volumes that is based on the integration of the Weibull function. The new method shows a better agreement with observed data, reconciling the debate on the use of the exponential versus power-law method. In fact, the Weibull best fitting only depends on three free parameters, can well reproduce the gradual thinning of tephra deposits, and does not depend on the choice of arbitrary segments or of arbitrary extremes of integration.