Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are an important cause of morbidity and are frequently associated with poor prognosis, particularly in high-risk patients. The cornerstones in the management of complicated IAIs are timely effective source control with appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Empiric antimicrobial therapy is important in the management of intra-abdominal infections and must be broad enough to cover all likely organisms because inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy is associated with poor patient outcomes and the development of bacterial resistance. The overuse of antimicrobials is widely accepted as a major driver of some emerging infections (such as C. difficile), the selection of resistant pathogens in individual patients, and for the continued development of antimicrobial resistance globally. The growing emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms and the limited development of new agents available to counteract them have caused an impending crisis with alarming implications, especially with regards to Gram-negative bacteria. An international task force from 79 different countries has joined this project by sharing a document on the rational use of antimicrobials for patients with IAIs. The project has been termed AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections). The authors hope that AGORA, involving many of the world's leading experts, can actively raise awareness in health workers and can improve prescribing behavior in treating IAIs.

Low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) face unique challenges with regard to the establishment of robust pharmacovigilance systems capable of generating data to inform healthcare policy and practice. These include the limited integration and reliability of pharmacovigilance systems across LMIC despite recent efforts to harmonize pharmacovigilance rules and regulations in several regional economic communities. There are particular challenges relating to the need to translate reporting tools into numerous local languages and the low numbers of healthcare providers relative to number of patients, with very short consultation times. Additional factors frequent in LMIC include high uptake of herbal and traditional medication, mostly by self‐medication; disruptive political conflicts jeopardizing fragile systems; and little or no access to drug utilization data, which makes it difficult to reliably estimate the true risks of medicines use. Pharmacovigilance activities are hindered by the scarcity of well‐trained personnel with little or no budgetary support from national governments; high turnover of pharmacovigilance staff whose training involves a substantial amount of resources; and little awareness of pharmacovigilance among healthcare workers, decision makers and consumers. Furthermore, little collaboration between public health programmes and national medicines regulatory authorities coupled with limited investment in pharmacovigilance activities, especially during mass drug administration for neglected tropical diseases and mass vaccinations, produces major challenges in establishing a culture where pharmacovigilance is systematically embedded. Very low spontaneous reporting rates with poor quality reports hinders robust signal detection analyses. This review summarises the specific challenges and areas of progress in pharmacovigilance in LMIC with special focus on the situation in Africa.

To describe the patterns of systemic antibiotic use and missed-dose days and detail the prescription, dispensing and administration of frequently used hospital-initiated antibiotics among Ugandan inpatients. This was a prospective cohort of consented adult inpatients admitted on the medical and gynaecological wards of the 1790 bed Mulago National Referral Hospital. Overall, 79% (603/762; 95% CI: 76%–82%) of inpatients received at least one antibiotic during hospitalization while 39% (300/762; 95% CI: 36%–43%) had used at least one antibiotic in the 4 weeks pre-admission; 1985 antibiotic DDDs, half administered parenterally, were consumed in 3741 inpatient-days. Two-fifths of inpatients who received at least one of the five frequently used hospital-initiated antibiotics (ceftriaxone, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin and azithromycin) missed at least one antibiotic dose-day (44%, 243/558). The per-day risk of missed antibiotic administration was greatest on day 1: ceftriaxone (36%, 143/398), metronidazole (27%, 67/245), ciprofloxacin (34%, 39/114) and all inpatients who missed at least one dose-day of prescribed amoxicillin and azithromycin. Most patients received fewer doses than were prescribed: ceftriaxone (74%, 273/371), ciprofloxacin (90%, 94/105) and metronidazole (97%, 222/230). Of prescribed doses, only 62% of ceftriaxone doses (1178/1895), 35% of ciprofloxacin doses (396/1130) and 27% of metronidazole doses (1043/3862) were administered. Seven percent (13/188) of patients on intravenous metronidazole and 6% (5/87) on intravenous ciprofloxacin switched to oral route. High rates of antibiotic use both pre-admission and during hospitalization were observed, with low parenteral/oral switch of hospital-initiated antibiotics. Underadministration of prescribed antibiotics was common, especially on the day of prescription, risking loss of efficacy and antibiotic resistance.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4–6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal.

Objectives Pharmacovigilance databases play a critical role in monitoring drug safety. The duplication of reports in pharmacovigilance databases, however, undermines their data integrity. This scoping review sought to provide a comprehensive understanding of duplication in pharmacovigilance databases worldwide. Design A scoping review. Data sources Reviewers comprehensively searched the literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and other relevant websites. Eligibility criteria Peer-reviewed publications and grey literature, without language restriction, describing duplication and/or methods relevant to duplication in pharmacovigilance databases from inception to 1 September 2023. Data extraction and synthesis We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and conformed with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. One reviewer extracted the data and performed descriptive analysis, which the second reviewer assessed. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus or in consultation with a third reviewer. Results We screened 22 745 unique titles and 156 were eligible for full-text review. Of the 156 titles, 58 (47 peer-reviewed; 11 grey literature) fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Included titles addressed the extent (5 papers), prevention strategies (15 papers), causes (32 papers), detection methods (25 papers), management strategies (24 papers) and implications (14 papers) of duplication in pharmacovigilance databases. The papers overlapped, discussing more than one field. Advances in artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing, hold promise in enhancing the efficiency and precision of deduplication of large and complex pharmacovigilance databases. Conclusion Duplication in pharmacovigilance databases compromises risk assessment and decision-making, potentially threatening patient safety. Therefore, efficient duplicate prevention, detection and management are essential for more reliable pharmacovigilance data. To minimise duplication, consistent use of worldwide unique identifiers as the key case identifiers is recommended alongside recent advances in artificial intelligence.

Background: Data on discontinuation and modification of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) are scarce among sub-Saharan African populations. We sought to estimate the prevalence and to identify factors associated with these phenomena in our resource-limited setting. Methods: Patients were recruited into this cross-sectional study from 2 treatment centers in Kampala, Uganda. Discontinuation and modification were assessed by self-report using semistructured quantitative and unstructured qualitative interviews. Discontinuation was defined as the simultaneous stopping of all antiretrovirals for at least 1 month, and modification as the changing of at least 1 antiretroviral used in an initial HAART regimen. Factors independently associated with each outcome were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 686 subjects evaluated, 94 (13.7%) had ever discontinued therapy, whereas 175 (25.5%) had ever modified their regimen. The median CD4 count was 175 (interquartile range: 66-297) cells/μL. Factors associated with discontinuation were HAART experience before starting the current regimen (odds ratio [OR] = 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.13 to 6.25), use of alternative medicines (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.06 to 4.47), hospitalization (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.32 to 4.20), and 1 year or less on HAART (OR = 11.11, 95% CI: 5.00 to 25.00). Modification was associated with more than 3 months' duration on HAART (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.16 to 8.33) and being unmarried (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.70). Conclusions: The proportions of discontinuation and modification of antiretroviral therapy (ART) observed in our resource-poor setting pose a challenge to the limited treatment options presently available. Drug cost as a major reason for discontinuation of HAART has major implications for ART programs that charge fees in resource-limited settings.