Jarmila Heissigerova

Prof. Dr. Jarmila Heissigerova

Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Journal of Immunology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jarmila HeissigerovaJarmila Heissigerova
Jarmila Heissigerova
PSPetra Seidler Stangova
Petra Seidler Stangova
AKAneta Klimova
Aneta Klimova
PSPetra Svozilkova
Petra Svozilkova
Tomas HrncirTomas Hrncir
Tomas Hrncir
JFJohn V. Forrester
John V. Forrester
The microbiota is a crucial modulator of the immune system. Here, we evaluated how its absence or reduction modifies the inflammatory response in the murine model of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU). We induced EAU in germ-free (GF) or conventionally housed (CV) mice and in CV mice treated with a combination of broad-spectrum antibiotics either from the day of EAU induction or from one week prior to induction of disease. The severity of the inflammation was assessed by fundus biomicroscopy or by histology, including immunohistology. The immunophenotyping of T cells in local and distant lymph nodes was performed by flow cytometry. We found that GF mice and mice where the microbiota was reduced one week before EAU induction were protected from severe autoimmune inflammation. GF mice had lower numbers of infiltrating macrophages and significantly less T cell infiltration in the retina than CV mice with EAU. GF mice also had reduced numbers of IFN-γand IL-17-producing T cells and increased numbers of regulatory T cells in the eye-draining lymph nodes. These data suggest that the presence of microbiota during autoantigen recognition regulates the inflammatory response by influencing the adaptive immune response.

25 December 2020 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ODOtakar Dusek
Otakar Dusek
AFAlena Fajstova
Alena Fajstova
AKAneta Klimova
Aneta Klimova
PSPetra Svozilkova
Petra Svozilkova
Tomas HrncirTomas Hrncir
Tomas Hrncir
Jarmila HeissigerovaJarmila Heissigerova
Jarmila Heissigerova
Non-infectious uveitis is considered an autoimmune disease responsible for a significant burden of blindness in developed countries and recent studies have linked its pathogenesis to dysregulation of the gut microbiota. We tested the immunomodulatory properties of two probiotics, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) and E. coli O83:K24:H31 (EcO), in a model of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU). To determine the importance of bacterial viability and treatment timing, mice were orally treated with live or autoclaved bacteria in both preventive and therapeutic schedules. Disease severity was assessed by ophthalmoscopy and histology, immune phenotypes in mesenteric and cervical lymph nodes were analyzed by flow cytometry and the gut immune environment was analyzed by RT-PCR and/or gut tissue culture. EcN, but not EcO, protected against EAU but only as a live organism and only when administered before or at the time of disease induction. Successful prevention of EAU was accompanied by a decrease in IRBP-specific T cell response in the lymph nodes draining the site of immunization as early as 7 days after the immunization and eye-draining cervical lymph nodes when the eye inflammation became apparent. Furthermore, EcN promoted an anti-inflammatory response in Peyer’s patches, increased gut antimicrobial peptide expression and decreased production of inducible nitric oxide synthase in macrophages. In summary, we show here that EcN controls inflammation in EAU and suggest that probiotics may have a role in regulating the gut–eye axis.

1 June 2012 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLRichard W.J. Lee
Richard W.J. Lee
RGRosemary Greenwood
Rosemary Greenwood
HTHazel Taylor
Hazel Taylor
RARadgonde Amer
Radgonde Amer
SBSabine Biester
Sabine Biester
ADAndrew D. Dick
Andrew D. Dick

17 September 2010 in European Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPetra Svozilkova
Petra Svozilkova
Jarmila HeissigerovaJarmila Heissigerova
Jarmila Heissigerova
MBMichaela Bhchova
Michaela Bhchova
BKBohdana Kalvodova
Bohdana Kalvodova
JDJan Dvorak
Jan Dvorak
EREva Rihova
Eva Rihova
Purpose: TO assess the diagnostic yield of vitreous fluid analysis and the therapeutic effect of pars plana vitrectomy in patients with suspected intraocular inflammation. Methods: During 2004–2008, pars plana vitrectomy was performed in 89 patients (101 eyes) out of 1233 patients with uveitis. Vitreous specimens were analyzed by cytologic and histopathologic examination, microbiologic culture, polymerase chain reaction, antibody determination, and flow cytometry. Vitrectomy was performed in 85 eyes for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes; the remaining 16 eyes underwent only diagnostic pars plana vitrectomy. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected Snellen visual acuity was compared. Results: Preoperative diagnoses were infection in 40 patients, malignant masquerade syndrome in 10 patients, and idiopathic uveitis in 39 patients. Vitreous analysis contributed to the determination of diagnosis in 54 patients (61%). Final diagnoses were infection in 42 patients, malignant masquerade syndrome in 6 patients, benign masquerade syndrome in 16 patients, and idiopathic uveitis in 25 patients. Vitreous fluid collected from each eye underwent approximately 2.2 (range 1–6) laboratory tests. Therapeutic reasons for vitrectomy were the treatment of complications of uveitis in 42 eyes and/or intravitreal application of anti-infectious or cytostatic drugs in 49 eyes. Overall, the visual acuity improved in 45% of eyes, remained unchanged in 45% of eyes, and decreased in 10% of eyes in 3 months after surgery. Conclusions: Pars plana vitrectomy with carefully selected testing is a valuable tool for assessment of diagnosis in a large proportion of patients with uveitis. Moreover, the therapeutic effect of vitrectomy can improve the visual outcomes in these patients.

18 September 2023 in Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMagdalena Bazewicz
Magdalena Bazewicz
Jarmila HeissigerovaJarmila Heissigerova
Jarmila Heissigerova
CPCarlos Pavesio
Carlos Pavesio
FWFrançois Willermain
François Willermain
JSJanusz Skrzypecki
Janusz Skrzypecki
Sarcoidosis-associated uveitis, is the predominant ocular sarcoidosis presentation, which affects both adults and children. For adults, international ocular sarcoidosis criteria (IWOS) and sarcoidosis-associated uveitis criteria (SUN) are defined. However, for children they are not yet established internationally. Due to the specificity of pediatric manifestations of sarcoidosis, this task is even more challenging. In children, sarcoidosis is subdivided into Blau syndrome and early-onset sarcoidosis (BS/EOS) affecting younger children (< 5 years) and the one affecting older children with clinical presentation resembling adults. Differential diagnosis, clinical work-up as well as diagnostic criteria should be adapted to each age group. In this article, we review the clinical manifestation of sarcoidosis-associated uveitis in adults and children and the sensitivity and specificity of various ocular sarcoidosis diagnostic modalities, including chest X-ray and CT, FDG PET-CT, gallium-67 scintigraphy, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, genetic testing for NOD2 mutations and serum biomarkers, such as ACE, lysozyme and IL2R.

7 January 2013 in Virology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPetra Svozilkova
Petra Svozilkova
Jarmila HeissigerovaJarmila Heissigerova
Jarmila Heissigerova
MBMichaela Brichová
Michaela Brichová
BKBohdana Kalvodová
Bohdana Kalvodová
JDJan Dvořák
Jan Dvořák
EŘEva Říhová
Eva Říhová
Purpose: To present a possible coincidence of cytomegalovirus retinitis and intraocular lymphoma in a patient with systemic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Case presentation: A 47-year-old woman presented with decreased visual acuity associated with white retinal lesions in both eyes. A history of pneumonia of unknown aetiology closely preceded the deterioration of vision. Five years previously the patient was diagnosed with follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She was treated with a chemotherapy regimen comprised of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristin, and prednisone with later addition of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. She experienced a relapse 19 months later with involvement of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and commenced treatment with rituximab and 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan. A second relapse occurred 22 months after radioimmunotherapy and was treated with a combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone followed by rituximab. The patient experienced no further relapses until the current presentation (April, 2010). Pars plana vitrectomy with vitreous fluid analysis was performed in the right eye. PCR testing confirmed the presence of cytomegalovirus in the vitreous. Atypical lymphoid elements, highly suspicious of malignancy were also found on cytologic examination. Intravenous foscarnet was administered continually for three weeks, followed by oral valganciclovir given in a dose of 900 mg twice per day. In addition, the rituximab therapy continued at three monthly intervals. Nevertheless, cessation of foscarnet therapy was followed by a recurrence of retinitis on three separate occasions during a 3-month period instigating its reinduction to the treatment regime after each recurrence. Conclusions: Cytomegalovirus retinitis is an opportunistic infection found in AIDS patients as well as in bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients being treated with systemic immunosuppressive drugs. This case presents a less common incidence of cytomegalovirus retinitis occurring in a patient with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. We demonstrated a possible coexistence of cytomegalovirus retinitis and intraocular lymphoma in this particular patient. The final diagnosis was based on clinical manifestations together with the course of uveitis and its response to treatment alongside the results of vitreous fluid analysis. This report highlights the importance of intraocular fluid examination in cases with nonspecific clinical manifestations. Such an examination allows for the detection of simultaneously ongoing ocular diseases of differing aetiologies and enables the prompt initiation of effective treatment.