Jianmei Feng

Dr. Jianmei Feng

Department of Compressor Engineering, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 October 2020 in International Journal of Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJiquan Han
Jiquan Han
JFJianmei Feng
Jianmei Feng
THTianfang Hou
Tianfang Hou
XPXueyuan Peng
Xueyuan Peng

1 January 2021 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPengtai Gu
Pengtai Gu
LXLinfen Xing
Linfen Xing
YWYuefei Wang
Yuefei Wang
JFJianmei Feng
Jianmei Feng
XPXueyuan Peng
Xueyuan Peng

1 January 2022 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJiquan Han
Jiquan Han
JFJianmei Feng
Jianmei Feng
XPXueyuan Peng
Xueyuan Peng

15 November 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LXlinfen xing
linfen xing
JFJianmei Feng
Jianmei Feng
WCWenqing Chen
Wenqing Chen
ZXZiyi Xing
Ziyi Xing
XPXueyuan Peng
Xueyuan Peng
In this paper, the development and testing of a Roots pump with a new rotor profile for hydrogen recirculation in the fuel cell system are presented. The design method of the rotor profile, port position, and structure of the pump is presented. A prototype of a three-lobe Roots pump with helical rotors was fabricated, and its performance was experimentally tested. The measured data show that the effect of the pressure difference on the flow rate and volumetric efficiency of the Roots pump is the most significant, while the effect of suction pressure is limited. It is concluded that the leakage rather than flow resistance is the key factor, which has a major influence on volumetric and isentropic efficiency. The comparison of the performance is also given by the measured results of the same Roots pump working with air, helium, and hydrogen. Finally, the successful integration of the Roots pumps into three PEM fuel cell systems is reported and the optimal operating parameters of the Roots pump in the systems under various loads are also presented. It is found that the performance of the Roots pump integrated into the fuel cell system is better than that measured with pure hydrogen on the test rig. The performance maps composed of all the measured data of the Roots pump are very helpful for the optimal design and operation of the fuel cell system.

13 July 2022 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJiquan Han
Jiquan Han
BZBin Zhao
Bin Zhao
ZPZihui Pang
Zihui Pang
JFJianmei Feng
Jianmei Feng
XPXueyuan Peng
Xueyuan Peng

24 December 2020 in International Journal of Green Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJiquan Han
Jiquan Han
JFJianmei Feng
Jianmei Feng
THTianfang Hou
Tianfang Hou
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
XPXueyuan Peng
Xueyuan Peng
The gas-water separator is an important auxiliary component of the hydrogen recirculation subsystem for the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. This study investigated three baffle separators with different structures used for a 75 kW PEMFC system by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation and experimental validation. An Euler-Lagrange two-phase simulation model was established to investigate the gas-phase flow characteristics and the droplets trajectory and film distribution in separators. Moreover, an experimental bench was set up to test the overall performance of the separators. The results showed that the CFD model can predict the performance of the gas-water separator accurately. Through the comparison of air and mixed hydrogen, it was found that the density of the gas phase fluid has a great influence on the pressure drop. The local gas flow at the baffle bottom where the film fall directly is at high velocity in separator A, resulting in that the liquid film is broken easily to cause more fine droplets being entrained again into the outflow. Besides, thicker liquid film still formed in the top part of the separators A and B compared with separator C, which is not conducive for high separation performance. Thus, the separator C is preferred to be suggested for PEMFC systems.