New Findings: What is the central question of this study? Does manipulation of the work of breathing during high‐intensity exercise alter respiratory and locomotor muscle blood flow? What is the main finding and its importance? We found that when the work of breathing was reduced during exercise, respiratory muscle blood flow decreased, while locomotor muscle blood flow increased. Conversely, when the work of breathing was increased, respiratory muscle blood flow increased, while locomotor muscle blood flow decreased. Our findings support the theory of a competitive relationship between locomotor and respiratory muscles during intense exercise. Manipulation of the work of breathing (WOB) during near‐maximal exercise influences leg blood flow, but the effects on respiratory muscle blood flow are equivocal. We sought to assess leg and respiratory muscle blood flow simultaneously during intense exercise while manipulating WOB. Our hypotheses were as follows: (i) increasing the WOB would increase respiratory muscle blood flow and decrease leg blood flow; and (ii) decreasing the WOB would decrease respiratory muscle blood flow and increase leg blood flow. Eight healthy subjects (n = 5 men, n = 3 women) performed a maximal cycle test (day 1) and a series of constant‐load exercise trials at 90% of peak work rate (day 2). On day 2, WOB was assessed with oesophageal balloon catheters and was increased (via resistors), decreased (via proportional assist ventilation) or unchanged (control) during the trials. Blood flow was assessed using near‐infrared spectroscopy optodes placed over quadriceps and the sternocleidomastoid muscles, coupled with a venous Indocyanine Green dye injection. Changes in WOB were significantly and positively related to changes in respiratory muscle blood flow (r = 0.73), whereby increasing the WOB increased blood flow. Conversely, changes in WOB were significantly and inversely related to changes in locomotor blood flow (r = 0.57), whereby decreasing the WOB increased locomotor blood flow. Oxygen uptake was not different during the control and resistor trials (3.8 ± 0.9 versus 3.7 ± 0.8 l min⁻¹, P > 0.05), but was lower on the proportional assist ventilator trial (3.4 ± 0.7 l min⁻¹, P < 0.05) compared with control. Our findings support the concept that respiratory muscle work significantly influences the distribution of blood flow to both respiratory and locomotor muscles.

In this review, we detail how the pulmonary system's response to exercise is impacted by both sex and gender in healthy humans across the lifespan. First, the rationale for why sex and gender differences should be considered is explored, and then anatomical differences are highlighted, namely that females typically have smaller lungs and airways than males. Thereafter, we describe how these anatomical differences can impact functional aspects such as respiratory muscle energetics and activation, mechanical ventilatory constraints, diaphragm fatigue, and pulmonary gas exchange in healthy adults and children. Finally, we detail how gender can impact the pulmonary response to exercise.

New Findings: What is the topic of this review? This review focuses on sex‐based differences in the anatomy of the respiratory system, which manifest in mechanical ventilatory contraints and potentially alter the integrative response to exercise. What advances does it highlight? Recent evidence indicates that women have smaller conducting airways than men, even when matched for lung size. Consequently, women are more likely to experience mechanical ventilatory constraints to exercise hyperpnoea. Furthermore, at a given ventilation, women have a higher work and oxygen cost of breathing, both of which may lead to differences in the whole‐body integrative response to dynamic exercise. Our understanding of the human ventilatory response to exercise is largely based on a historical body of literature focused primarily on male rather than female research subjects. In recent years, important sex‐based differences in the anatomy of the human respiratory system have been identified; for a given lung size, women appear to have smaller‐diameter conducting airways than men. The presence of such inherent differences in the tracheobronchial tree greatly affects the mechanics of airflow generation, especially during conditions of high ventilation rates, such as exercise. Data from a growing number of studies suggest that women may be more susceptible to respiratory system limitations during exercise than their male counterparts. Specifically, women are more likely to experience expiratory flow limitation and exercise‐induced arterial hypoxaemia and have a higher metabolic cost of breathing for a given ventilation. Collectively, the available evidence suggests that sex differences in the ventilatory response to exercise are present and may have important ramifications for the integrated response to exercise; however, several fundamental questions remain unanswered.

We asked if the higher work of breathing (W_b) during exercise in women compared with men is explained by biological sex. We created a statistical model that accounts for both the viscoelastic and the resistive components of the total W_band independently compares the effects of biological sex. We applied the model to esophageal pressure-derived W_bvalues obtained during an incremental cycle test to exhaustion. Subjects were healthy men ( n = 17) and women ( n = 18) with a range of maximal aerobic capacities (V̇o_{2 max}range: men = 40-68 and women = 39–60 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹). We also calculated the dysanapsis ratio using measures of lung recoil and forced expiratory flow as index of airway caliber. By applying the model we found that the differences in the total W_bduring exercise in women are due to a higher resistive W_brather than viscoelastic W_b. We also found that the higher resistive W_bis independently explained by biological sex. To account for the known effect of lung volumes on the dysanapsis ratio we compared the sexes with an analysis of covariance procedures and found that when vital capacity was accounted for the adjusted mean dysanapsis ratio is statistically lower in women (0.17 vs. 0.25 arbitrary units; P < 0.05). Our collective findings suggest that innate sex-based differences may exist in human airways, which result in significant male-female differences in the W_bduring exercise in healthy subjects.

We examined the effects of age, sex, and their interaction on mechanical ventilatory constraint and dyspnea during exercise in 22 older (age = 68 ± 1 yr; n = 12 women) and 22 younger (age = 25 ± 1 y, n = 11 women) subjects. During submaximal exercise, older subjects had higher end-inspiratory (EILV) and end-expiratory (EELV) lung volumes than younger subjects (both P < 0.05). During maximal exercise, older subjects had similar EILV ( P > 0.05) but higher EELV than younger subjects ( P < 0.05). No sex differences in EILV or EELV were observed. We noted that women had a higher work of breathing (W_b) for a given minute ventilation (V̇e) ≥65 l/min than men ( P < 0.05) and older subjects had a higher W_b for a given V̇e ≥60 l/min ( P < 0.05). No sex or age differences in W_b were present at any submaximal relative V̇e. At absolute exercise intensities, older women experienced expiratory flow limitation (EFL) more frequently than older men ( P < 0.05), and older subjects were more likely to experience EFL than younger subjects ( P < 0.05). At relative exercise intensities, women and older individuals experienced EFL more frequently than men and younger individuals, respectively (both P < 0.05). There were significant effects of age, sex, and their interaction on dyspnea intensity during exercise at absolute, but not relative, intensities (all P < 0.05). Across subjects, dyspnea at 80 W was significantly correlated with indexes of mechanical ventilatory constraint (all P < 0.05). Collectively, our findings suggest age and sex have significant impacts on W_b, operating lung volumes, EFL, and dyspnea during exercise. Moreover, it appears that mechanical ventilatory constraint may partially explain sex differences in exertional dyspnea in older individuals. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found that age and sex have a significant effect on mechanical ventilatory constraint and the perception of dyspnea during exercise. We also observed that the perception of exertional dyspnea is associated with indexes of mechanical ventilatory constraint. Collectively, our results suggest that the combined influences of age and biological sex on mechanical ventilatory constraint during exercise contributes, in part, to the increased perception of dyspnea during exercise in older women.