Background: As the most abundant epigenetic modification on mRNAs and long non‐coding RNAs, N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) modification extensively exists in mammalian cells. Controlled by writers (methyltransferases), readers (signal transducers), and erasers (demethylases), m6A influences mRNA structure, maturation, and stability, thus negatively regulating protein expression in a post‐translational manner. Nevertheless, current understanding of m6A's roles in tumorigenesis, especially in gastric cancer (GC) remains to be unveiled. In this study, we assessed m6A's clinicopathological relevance to GC and explored the underlying mechanisms.Methods: By referring to a proteomics‐based GC cohort we previously generated and the TCGA‐GC cohort, we merged expressions of canonical m6A writers (METTL3/METTL14), readers (YTHDF1/YTHDF2/YTHDF3), and erasers (ALKBH5/FTO), respectively, as W, R, and E signatures to represent m6A modification. We stratified patients according to these signatures to decipher m6A's associations with crucial mutations, prognosis, and clinical indexes. m6A's biological functions in GC were predicted by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and validated by in vitro experiments.Results: We discovered that W and R were potential tumor suppressive signatures, while E was a potential oncogenic signature in GC. According to W/R/E stratifications, patients with low m6A‐indications were accompanied with higher mutations of specific genes (CDH1, AR, GLI3, SETBP1, RHOA, MUC6, and TP53) and also demonstrated adverse clinical outcomes. GSEA suggested that reduced m6A was correlated with oncogenic signaling and phenotypes. Through in vitro experiments, we proved that m6A suppression (represented by METTL14 knockdown) promoted GC cell proliferation and invasiveness through activating Wnt and PI3K‐Akt signaling, while m6A elevation (represented by FTO knockdown) reversed these phenotypical and molecular changes. m6A may also be involved in interferon signaling and immune responses of GC.Conclusions: Our work demonstrated that low‐m6A signatures predicted adverse clinicopathological features of GC, while the reduction of RNA m6A methylation activated oncogenic Wnt/PI3K‐Akt signaling and promoted malignant phenotypes of GC cells.

A single biomarker is not adequate to identify patients with gastric cancer (GC) who have the potential to benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, presumably owing to the complexity of the tumour microenvironment. The predictive value of tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) has not been definitively established with regard to their density and spatial organisation. Here, multiplex immunohistochemistry is used to quantify in situ biomarkers at sub-cellular resolution in 80 patients with GC. To predict the response to immunotherapy, we establish a multi-dimensional TIIC signature by considering the density of CD4⁺FoxP3⁻PD-L1⁺, CD8⁺PD-1⁻LAG3⁻, and CD68⁺STING⁺ cells and the spatial organisation of CD8⁺PD-1⁺LAG3⁻ T cells. The TIIC signature enables prediction of the response of patients with GC to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and patient survival. Our findings demonstrate that a multi-dimensional TIIC signature may be relevant for the selection of patients who could benefit the most from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Background: The FAST study identified claudin-18 (CLDN18.2) as a promising novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer (GC). However, the tumor immune microenvironment and clinicopathological features of CLDN18.2-positive GC are unclear, making it difficult to develop and optimize CLDN18.2-targeted treatments. Methods: This study included 80 GC patients, 60 of whom received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. CD4/CD8/CD20/CD66b/CD68/CD163/PD-1/PD-L1/TIM-3/LAG-3/FoxP3/CTLA-4/HLA-DR/STING, and CLDN18.2 were labeled using multiplex immunohistochemistry (m-IHC) to decipher the rate and spatial distribution of T cells, B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues isolated from these patients. Tumor immune-microenvironmental features and patient survival stratified by CLDN18.2 expression were analyzed using two independent-sample t-tests and log-rank tests, respectively. Results: We considered moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression ≥ 40% of tumor cells as the cut-off for positivity. The proportion of CD8⁺PD-1⁻, CD8⁺LAG-3⁻, and CD8⁺TIM-3⁻ T cells was significantly higher in CLDN18.2-positive tumors than in negative tumors (0.039 vs. 0.026, P = 0.009; 0.050 vs.0.035, P = 0.024; 0.045 vs. 0.032, P = 0.038, respectively). In addition, the number of neutrophils (CD66b⁺) was higher in the CLDN18.2-positive group than in the negative group (0.081 vs. 0.055, P = 0.031, respectively), while the rates of M1 (CD68⁺CD163⁻HLA-DR⁺), M2 macrophages (CD68⁺CD163⁺HLA-DR⁻), and B cells (CD20⁺) were comparable between the CLDN18.2-positive and negative groups. The average numbers of CD8⁺PD-1⁻, CD8⁺LAG-3⁻, and CD8⁺TIM-3⁻T cells surrounding tumor cells within a 20-μm range were higher in CLDN18.2-positive tumors than in the CLDN18.2-negative tumors (0.16 vs. 0.09, P = 0.011; 0.20 vs. 0.12, P = 0.029; 0.18 vs. 0.12, P = 0.047, respectively). In addition, in the CLDN18.2-positive group, tumor cells surrounded by CD8⁺PD-1⁻, CD8⁺LAG-3⁻ T cells, or M1 macrophages within a 20-μm range accounted for a higher proportion of all tumor cells than those in the CLDN18.2-negative group (10.79% vs. 6.60%, P = 0.015; 12.68% vs. 8.70%, P = 0.049; 9.08% vs. 6.56%, P = 0.033, respectively). These findings suggest that CLDN18.2-positive GC harbors complex immune-microenvironmental features. Additionally, CLDN18.2-positive group had shorter OS and irOS than CLDN18.2-negative group (median OS: 23.33 vs.36.6 months, P < 0.001; median irOS: 10.03 vs. 20.13 months, P = 0.044, respectively). Conclusions: CLDN18.2-positive GC displayed unique immune-microenvironmental characteristics, which is of great significance for the development of CLDN18.2-targeted therapies. However, the impact of CLDN18.2-related microenvironmental features on prognosis requires further investigation.

The application of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains challenging because of the limited response rate and emerging therapeutic resistance. Combining clinical cohorts, multi‐omics study, and functional/molecular experiments, it is found that ANO1 amplification or high‐expression predicts poor outcomes and resistance to immunotherapy for GI cancer patients. Knocking‐down or inhibiting ANO1 suppresses the growth/metastasis/invasion of multiple GI cancer cell lines, cell‐derived xenograft, and patient‐derived xenograft models. ANO1 contributes to an immune‐suppressive tumor microenvironment and induces acquired resistance to anti‐PD‐1 immunotherapy, while ANO1 knockdown or inhibition enhances immunotherapeutic effectiveness and overcomes resistance to immunotherapy. Mechanistically, through inhibiting cancer ferroptosis in a PI3K‐Akt signaling‐dependent manner, ANO1 enhances tumor progression and facilitates cancer‐associated fibroblast recruitment by promoting TGF‐β release, thus crippling CD8⁺ T cell‐mediated anti‐tumor immunity and generating resistance to immunotherapy. This work highlights ANO1's role in mediating tumor immune microenvironment remodeling and immunotherapeutic resistance, and introduces ANO1 as a promising target for GI cancers’ precision treatment.

Colorectal cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality globally, with 30% to 40% of cases developing metastasis, mainly to the liver. Although immunotherapy has shown promise for colorectal cancer treatment, patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) experience limited therapeutic benefits, potentially because of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Thus, an urgent need exists to identify the key players that drive CRLM and potentiate immunotherapeutic resistance. In this study, we established liver metastatic cells through continuous passaging in vivo, allowing the screening of RNA expression profiles related to CRLM. A combination of spatial transcriptomic sequencing and single-cell analysis revealed a substantial upregulation of SPP1 expression and secretion in CRLM. SPP1 induced immunotherapeutic resistance by stimulating CXCL12 production by cancer-associated fibroblasts through activation of β-catenin/HIF1α-related transcription. CXCL12 promoted epithelial–mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer cells but suppressed CD8+ T-cell infiltration. Treatment with a CXCL12 receptor antagonist or anti-SPP1 antibody markedly activated intratumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration and enhanced the efficacy of anti–PD-1 antibody treatment. Elevated SPP1 and CXCL12 corresponded to immunotherapy resistance in patients with CRLM. Together, this study highlights the potential of the SPP1/CXCL12 axis as a target and a biomarker for precise cancer immunotherapy in CRLM. The intricate interactions within the tumor microenvironment offer promising avenues for improving therapeutic outcomes in patients with CRLM. Significance: SPP1 orchestrates development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that supports liver metastasis of colorectal cancer cells, offering insights into potential strategies for improving immunotherapy efficacy in liver metastatic colorectal cancer.

Targeting poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) has been recently identified as a promising option against gastric cancer (GC). However, PARP inhibitors alone achieve limited efficacy. Combination strategies, especially with homologous recombination (HR) impairment, are of great hope to optimize PARP inhibitor’s efficacy and expand target populations but remains largely unknown. Herein, we investigated whether a WEE1/ Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) dual inhibitor AZD1775 reported to impair HR augmented anticancer activity of a PARP inhibitor olaparib and its underlying mechanisms. GC cell lines and in vivo xenografts were employed to determine antitumor activity of PARP inhibitor combined with WEE1/PLK1 dual inhibitor AZD1775. Western blot, genetic knockdown by siRNA, flow cytometry, Immunohistochemistry were performed to explore the underlying mechanisms. AZD1775 dually targeting WEE1/PLK1 enhanced effects of olaparib on growth inhibition and apoptotic induction in GC cells. Mechanistic investigations elucidate that WEE1/PLK1 blockade downregulated several HR-related proteins and caused an accumulation in γH2AX. As confirmed in both GC cell lines and mice bearing GC xenografts, these effects were enhanced by AZD1775-olaparib combination compared to olaparib alone, suggesting that disrupting HR-mediated DNA damage repairs (DDR) by WEE1/PLK1 blockade might be responsible for improved GC cells’ response to PARP inhibitors. Given the DNA damage checkpoint as a primary target of WEE1 inhibition, our data also demonstrate that AZD1775 abrogated olaparib-activated DNA damage checkpoint through CDC2 de-phosphorylation, followed by mitotic progression with unrepaired DNA damage (marked by increased pHH3-stained and γH2AX-stained cells, respectively). PARP inhibitor olaparib combined with WEE1/PLK1 dual inhibitor AZD1775 elicited potentiated anticancer activity through disrupting DDR signaling and the DNA damage checkpoint. It sheds light on the combination strategy of WEE1/PLK1 dual inhibitors with PARP inhibitors in the treatment of GC, even in HR-proficient patients.