Background: The results of laboratory analyses are affected by pre-analytical variables, and in particular can platelets be activated by shear handling stress and secrete granular substances. We therefore evaluated the effect of centrifugation speed and time on pre-analytical platelet activation. Methods: Citrate- and EDTA-anticoagulated blood from healthy volunteers were centrifuged at 80–10,000 g for 5–15 min to prepare plasma and platelet-rich plasma. Pre-analytical platelet activation was assessed by flow cytometric measurement of platelet P-selectin (CD62p) expression. Blood cell counts, mean platelet volume (MPV), immature platelet fraction (IPF), and platelet distribution width (PDW) were measured. Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma induced by arachidonic acid (AA), ADP or thrombin receptor activator peptide-6 (TRAP) was tested by 96-well aggregometry. Results: The median percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin in citrate- and EDTA-plasma centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min were 43% [interquartile range (IQR), 38%–53%] and 56% (IQR, 31%–78%), respectively (p=0.82). Platelet-rich plasma prepared at 100–250 g for 10 min had significantly lower platelet P-selectin expression (11%–15%), p<0.001. Platelet count in plasma samples decreased with increasing speed but platelets were only completely removed if plasma was re-centrifuged. In platelet-rich plasma, increasing centrifugation speed significantly increased platelet yield but decreased contamination from other blood cells, platelet composition was altered as platelet parameters (MPV, IPF, and PDW) was lowered. Platelet aggregation was not affected by the centrifugation speed platelet-rich plasma was prepared. Conclusions: Proportional to centrifugation speed, platelets in plasma and platelet-rich plasma were activated with centrifugation speed, cell content and composition changed while platelet aggregation was unaltered.
7 June 2019 in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
This review evaluates the role of platelets in bleeding risk among patients with hematological disease and thrombocytopenia. Platelets are pivotal in primary hemostasis, and possess non-hemostatic properties involved in angiogenesis, tissue repair, inflammation and metastatis. Also, platelets safeguard vascular integrity in inflamed vessels. Overall, bleeding risk depends on the underlying disease, and patients with cancer and platelet count <6–10 × 109/L have a markedly increased bleeding risk, while the platelet count does not correlate with bleeding risk at higher platelet counts. Other factors might affect platelet properties and thus bleeding risk, for example, drugs, low hematocrit, coagulation system impairments or transfusion of dysfunctional donor platelets. For patients with leukemia and immune thrombocytopenia, reduced platelet activation, platelet aggregation, or thrombopoiesis, reflected by the reduced presence of reticulated platelets, are associated with bleeding phenotype. However, mechanistic insight into the cause of reduced platelet function in different thrombocytopenic conditions is sparse, except for some inherited platelet disorders. Promising tools for platelet function studies in thrombocytopenia are flow cytometry and biomarker studies on platelet constituents. An important message from this current paper is that bleeding risk assessment must be tailored to specific patient populations and cannot be applied broadly to all patients with thrombocytopenia.