Despite recent striking advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosis and treatment is still considered challenging. Poor responders constitute a heterogeneous cohort with the common denominator of under-responding to controlled ovarian stimulation. Inevitably, respective success rates are significantly compromised. As POR pathophysiology entails the elusive factor of compromised ovarian function, both diagnosis and management fuel an ongoing heated debate depicted in the literature. From the criteria employed for diagnosis to the plethora of strategies and adjuvant therapies proposed, the conundrum of POR still puzzles the practitioner. What is more, novel treatment approaches from stem cell therapy and platelet-rich plasma intra-ovarian infusion to mitochondrial replacement therapy have emerged, albeit not claiming clinical routine status yet. The complex and time sensitive nature of this subgroup of infertile patients indicates the demand for a consensus on a horizontally accepted definition, diagnosis and subsequent effective treating strategy. This critical review analyzes the standing criteria employed in order to diagnose and aptly categorize POR patients, while it proceeds to critically evaluate current and novel strategies regarding their management. Discrepancies in diagnosis and respective implications are discussed, while the existing diversity in management options highlights the need for individualized management.

The authors attempt to address the importance of timely detection and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to prevent cervical cancer. The study focused on the potential of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) as an adjunct to colposcopy, aiming to enhance the accuracy of identifying high-grade cervical lesions. Colposcopy, a widely used technique, exhibited variable sensitivity in detecting high-grade lesions, which relies on the expertise of the operator. The study’s primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining colposcopy with EIS in detecting high-grade cervical lesions among patients initially diagnosed with low-grade CIN based on cytology. We employed a cross-sectional observational design, recruiting 101 women with abnormal cervical cytology results. The participants underwent colposcopy with acetic acid and subsequent EIS using the ZedScan device. The ZedScan results are categorized into color-coded probability levels, with red indicating the highest likelihood of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) occurrence. Results revealed that ZedScan exhibits a sensitivity rate of 89.5% and a specificity rate of 84% for detecting high-grade lesions. Colposcopy, on the other hand, recorded a sensitivity rate of 85.5% and a specificity rate of 92%. The agreement rate between ZedScan and biopsy is 79.2%, as indicated by a kappa coefficient of 0.71, while the agreement rate between colposcopy and biopsy is 74.3%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.71.

The authors attempt to addresses the importance of timely detection and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to prevent cervical cancer. The study focuses on the potential of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) as an adjunct to colposcopy, aiming to enhance the accuracy of identifying high-grade cervical lesions. Colposcopy, a widely used technique, exhibits variable sensitivity in detecting high-grade lesions, which relies on the expertise of the operator. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of combining colposcopy with EIS in detecting high-grade cervical lesions among patients initially diagnosed with low-grade CIN based on cytology. We employ a cross-sectional observational design, recruiting 101 women with abnormal cervical cytology results. The participants undergo colposcopy with acetic acid and subsequent EIS using the ZedScan device. The ZedScan results are categorized into color-coded probability levels, with red indicating the highest likelihood of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) occurrence. Results reveal that ZedScan exhibits a sensitivity rate of 89.5% and a specificity rate of 84% for detecting high-grade lesions. Colposcopy, on the other hand, records a sensitivity rate of 85.5% and a specificity rate of 92%. The agreement rate between ZedScan and biopsy is 79.2%, as indicated by a kappa coefficient of 0.71, while the agreement rate between colposcopy and biopsy is 74.3%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.71.

Objective: This retrospective observational study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an ovarian stimulation protocol for embryo banking that involves continuous administration of clomiphene citrate (CC) in combination with gonadotropins, without the use of GnRH antagonists. Methods: Conducted at the Serum IVF Clinic in Athens, Greece, the study included 250 women aged 25–45 who underwent IVF for embryo banking. The protocol involved administering 150 mg of CC daily from day 2 of the menstrual cycle until the day before hCG trigger, alongside 150 IU/day of Meriofert. Outcomes assessed included oocyte yield, fertilization rates, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and hormonal correlations. Comparative and regression analyses explored differences between age groups and predictors of success. Results: The protocol demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no cases of OHSS and yielded a mean of 10.25 oocytes per patient. Group analysis showed significantly more oocytes retrieved in women under 40 (mean: 12.5) versus those over 40 (mean: 8.43), while fertilization rates were paradoxically higher in the older cohort (59.16% vs. 30.68%, p < 0.0001). Regression models revealed basal FSH to be a significant inverse predictor of oocyte yield, but it was positively associated with fertilization rate. Continuous CC use effectively suppressed premature LH surges without compromising oocyte or embryo quality, allowing flexible and cost-effective stimulation with minimal monitoring. Conclusions: Continuous administration of clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins presents a promising, antagonist-free ovarian stimulation protocol for embryo banking. The approach is economically efficient, reduces monitoring requirements, and maintains safety and effectiveness and is particularly notable in women over 40. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine protocol mechanisms.

Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed as a potential intervention for promoting ovarian follicular development. However, its underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated whether the mechanisms through which PRP may influence follicular development are consistent with previously established regulatory mechanisms of human folliculogenesis. Methods: A systems biology approach was used to examine the mechanistic relationships between growth factors present in PRP and known regulators of human follicular development. Gene databases were compared, and pathway enrichment analysis and integrated network modeling were performed to identify shared signaling pathways and patterns of molecular connectivity. Results: Although there was limited overlap between the two gene databases, substantial convergence was observed in pathway enrichment and integrated network modeling. This convergence involved receptor tyrosine kinase-centered intracellular signaling pathways, particularly the PI3K–AKT and MAPK pathways. Network topology demonstrated coherent connectivity between extracellular growth factors and established survival and proliferation signaling axes. However, no overlap was identified between genes associated with PRP and genes encoding oocyte-specific transcriptional regulators involved in primordial follicle formation and differentiation. Discussion: These findings support a model in which PRP does not replace the endogenous transcriptional program governing follicular development. Instead, PRP may increase upstream growth factor signaling and enhance intrinsic survival and proliferation pathways within the ovarian microenvironment. This systems-level framework provides mechanistic insight into the biological plausibility of PRP use in reproductive medicine and offers a rational basis for targeted experimental validation.