Giuseppe Simone

Dr. Giuseppe Simone

Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2009 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGiuseppe Simone
Giuseppe Simone
RPRocco Papalia
Rocco Papalia
SGSalvatore Guaglianone
Salvatore Guaglianone
MFMariaconsiglia Ferriero
Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
CLCostantino Leonardo
Costantino Leonardo
MGMichele Gallucci
Michele Gallucci

1 January 2020 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francesco Del GiudiceFrancesco Del Giudice
Francesco Del Giudice
GBGiovanni Barchetti
Giovanni Barchetti
EBEttore De Berardinis
Ettore De Berardinis
MPMartina Pecoraro
Martina Pecoraro
VSVincenzo Salvo
Vincenzo Salvo
VPValeria Panebianco
Valeria Panebianco

1 July 2018 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VPValeria Panebianco
Valeria Panebianco
GBGiovanni Barchetti
Giovanni Barchetti
GSGiuseppe Simone
Giuseppe Simone
MMMaurizio Del Monte
Maurizio Del Monte
ACAntonio Ciardi
Antonio Ciardi
CCCarlo Catalano
Carlo Catalano

27 February 2019 in Cell Death & Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLudovica Grassi
Ludovica Grassi
RARomina Alfonsi
Romina Alfonsi
FFFederica Francescangeli
Federica Francescangeli
MSMichele Signore
Michele Signore
MAMaria Laura De Angelis
Maria Laura De Angelis
DBDésirée Bonci
Désirée Bonci
The pressure towards innovation and creation of new model systems in regenerative medicine and cancer research has fostered the development of novel potential therapeutic applications. Kidney injuries provoke a high request of organ transplants making it the most demanding system in the field of regenerative medicine. Furthermore, renal cancer frequently threaten patients’ life and aggressive forms still remain difficult to treat. Ethical issues related to the use of embryonic stem cells, has fueled research on adult, patient-specific pluripotent stem cells as a model for discovery and therapeutic development, but to date, normal and cancerous renal experimental models are lacking. Several research groups are focusing on the development of organoid cultures. Since organoids mimic the original tissue architecture in vitro, they represent an excellent model for tissue engineering studies and cancer therapy testing. We established normal and tumor renal cell carcinoma organoids previously maintained in a heterogeneous multi-clone stem cell-like enriching medium. Starting from adult normal kidney specimens, we were able to isolate and propagate organoid 3D-structures composed of both differentiated and undifferentiated cells while expressing nephron specific markers. Furthermore, we were capable to establish organoids derived from cancer tissues although with a success rate inferior to that of their normal counterpart. Cancer cultures displayed epithelial and mesenchymal phenotype while retaining tumor specific markers. Of note, tumor organoids recapitulated neoplastic masses when orthotopically injected into immunocompromised mice. Our data suggest an innovative approach of long-term establishment of normal- and cancer-derived renal organoids obtained from cultures of fleshly dissociated adult tissues. Our results pave the way to organ replacement pioneering strategies as well as to new models for studying drug-induced nephrotoxicity and renal diseases. Along similar lines, deriving organoids from renal cancer patients opens unprecedented opportunities for generation of preclinical models aimed at improving therapeutic treatments.

1 October 2015 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGiuseppe Simone
Giuseppe Simone
IGInderbir S. Gill
Inderbir S. Gill
AMAlexandre M. Mottrie
Alexandre M. Mottrie
AKAlexander Kutikov
Alexander Kutikov
JPJean-Jacques Patard
Jean-Jacques Patard
CRCraig G. Rogers
Craig G. Rogers

1 August 2018 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Riccardo BertoloRiccardo Bertolo
Riccardo Bertolo
RARiccardo Autorino
Riccardo Autorino
GSGiuseppe Simone
Giuseppe Simone
IDIthaar Derweesh
Ithaar Derweesh
JGJuan D. Garisto
Juan D. Garisto
FPFrancesco Porpiglia
Francesco Porpiglia
While partial nephrectomy (PN) represents the standard surgical management for cT1 renal masses, its role for cT2 tumors is controversial. Robot-assisted PN (RAPN) is being increasingly implemented worldwide. To analyze perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of RAPN for cT2 tumors. Retrospective analysis of a large multicenter, multinational dataset of patients with nonmetastatic cT2 masses treated with robotic surgery (ROSULA: RObotic SUrgery for LArge renal mass). Robotic-assisted PN. Patients' demographics, lesion characteristics, perioperative variables, renal functional data, pathology, and oncological data were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses assessed the relationships with the risk of intra-/postoperative complications, recurrence, and survival. A total of 298 patients were analyzed. Median tumor size was 7.6 (7-8.5) cm. Median RENAL score was 9 (8-10). Median ischemia time was 25 (20-32) min. Median estimated blood loss was 150 (100-300) ml. Sixteen patients had intraoperative complications (5.4%), whereas 66 (22%) had postoperative complications (5% were Clavien grade ≥3). Multivariable analysis revealed that a lower RENAL score (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.65, p=0.02) and pathological pT2 stage (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.12-0.86, p=0.001) were protective against postoperative complications. A total of 243 lesions (82%) were malignant. Twenty patients (8%) had positive surgical margins. Ten deaths and 25 recurrences/metastases occurred at a median follow-up of 12 (5-35) mo. At univariable analysis, higher pT stage was predictive of a likelihood of recurrences/metastases (p=0.048). While there was a significant deterioration of renal function at discharge, this remained stable over time at 1-yr follow-up. The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design. RAPN in the setting of select cT2 renal masses can safely be performed with acceptable outcomes. Further studies are warranted to corroborate our findings and to better define the role of robotic nephron sparing for this challenging indication. This report shows that robotic surgery can be used for safe removal of a large renal tumor in a minimally invasive fashion, maximizing preservation of renal function, and without compromising cancer control.