Key Points: Risk of grade III-IV acute and chronic GVHD is significantly lower with haploidentical compared with URD transplantation. Relapse risk, NRM, PFS, and OS was similar in haploidentical transplants compared with unrelated donor transplants.

BACKGROUND: Early treatment failure (ETF) in follicular lymphoma (FL), defined as relapse or progression within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy, is a newly recognized marker of poor survival and identifies a high‐risk group of patients with an expected 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 50%. Transplantation is an established option for relapsed FL, but its efficacy in this specific ETF FL population has not been previously evaluated.METHODS: This study compared autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto‐HCT) with either matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) as the first transplantation approach for patients with ETF FL (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing auto‐HCT or allo‐HCT between 2002 and 2014. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival, relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).RESULTS: Four hundred forty FL patients had ETF (auto‐HCT, 240; MSD hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [HCT], 105; and MUD HCT, 95). With a median follow‐up of 69 to 73 months, the adjusted probability of 5‐year OS was significantly higher after auto‐HCT (70%) or MSD HCT (73%) versus MUD HCT (49%; P = .0008). The 5‐year adjusted probability of NRM was significantly lower for auto‐HCT (5%) versus MSD (17%) or MUD HCT (33%; P < .0001). The 5‐year adjusted probability of disease relapse was lower with MSD (31%) or MUD HCT (23%) versus auto‐HCT (58%; P < .0001).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high‐risk FL, as defined by ETF, undergoing auto‐HCT for FL have low NRM and a promising 5‐year OS rate (70%). MSD HCT has lower relapse rates than auto‐HCT but similar OS. Cancer 2018;124:2541‐51. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

This study was conducted to compare long-term outcomes in patients with refractory/relapsed grades 1 and 2 follicular lymphoma (FL) after allogeneic (allo) versus autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the rituximab era. Adult patients with relapsed/refractory grades 1 and 2 FL undergoing first reduced-intensity allo-HCT or first autograft during 2000 to 2012 were evaluated. A total of 518 rituximab-treated patients were included. Allo-HCT patients were younger and more heavily pretreated, and more patients had advanced stage and chemoresistant disease. The 5-year adjusted probabilities, comparing auto-HCT versus allo-HCT groups for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 5% versus 26% (P < .0001); relapse/progression: 54% versus 20% (P < .0001); progression-free survival (PFS): 41% versus 58% (P < .001), and overall survival (OS): 74% versus 66% (P = .05). Auto-HCT was associated with a higher risk of relapse/progression beyond 5 months after HCT (relative risk [RR], 4.4; P < .0001) and worse PFS (RR, 2.9; P < .0001) beyond 11 months after HCT. In the first 24 months after HCT, auto-HCT was associated with improved OS (RR, .41; P < .0001), but beyond 24 months, it was associated with inferior OS (RR, 2.2; P = .006). A landmark analysis of patients alive and progression-free at 2 years after HCT confirmed these observations, showing no difference in further NRM between both groups, but there was significantly higher risk of relapse/progression (RR, 7.3; P < .0001) and inferior PFS (RR, 3.2; P < .0001) and OS (RR, 2.1; P = .04) after auto-HCT. The 10-year cumulative incidences of second hematological malignancies after allo-HCT and auto-HCT were 0% and 7%, respectively. Auto-HCT and reduced-intensity-conditioned allo-HCT as first transplantation approach can provide durable disease control in grades 1 and 2 FL patients. Continued disease relapse risk after auto-HCT translates into improved PFS and OS after allo-HCT in long-term survivors.

Central nervous system myelomatosis (CNS MM) is a rare localization of multiple myeloma (MM) affecting fewer than 1% of patients. This condition has been treated with intrathecal therapy, cranial i...

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered a valid second-line treatment for acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Ninety-four patients with acute GVHD (aGVHD) (n = 45) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (n = 49), retrospectively recruited in 6 Italian centers, were submitted to ECP for second-line treatment. At the time of ECP, 22 (49%) and 23 (51%) of 45 patients with aGHVD were nonresponsive and in partial remission (PR) after steroids, respectively, and all the 49 patients with cGVHD were steroid refractory. Forty-one (91%) of 45 patients with aGVHD achieved complete remission (CR) after ECP. Fifteen (33%) of 45 patients developed cGVHD. The CR rate in patients who started ECP being nonresponsive and in PR after steroid was 86% and 96%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 2-72), 15 (33%) of 45 patients developed cGHVD and 16 (35%) of 45 patients died, in 3 cases for aGVHD. A trend for a better survival was seen among patients who started ECP in PR after steroid (80% vs 50% at 2 years; P = 0.07). Overall, 22 (45%) of 49 patients and 17 (35%) of 49 patients with steroid refractory cGHVD achieved CR and PR after ECP, respectively. After a median follow-up of 27 months, 44 (90%) of 49 patients are alive, 21 of whom (48%) are on steroid. Extracorporeal photopheresis is confirmed as an effective second-line treatment in both aGVHD and cGVHD, because it can induce a response in more than 80% of the patients and a long-term survival in at least 50% of the cases.

The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) is a laboratory-based prognosis index defined as creatinine × lactate dehydrogenase/platelets. When measured at pretransplantation evaluation (EASIX-PRE), it predicts allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) mortality. This study explores its ability to predict intensive care unit (ICU) admission and validates EASIX-PRE predictive power for overall survival (OS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in 167 consecutive patients undergoing alloHCT. EASIX-PRE was calculated retrospectively in all patients and transformed into log2 values (log2-EASIX-PRE). Log2-EASIX-PRE predicted ICU admission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; P < .001), OS (HR, 1.19; P = .011), and NRM (HR, 1.28; P = .004). The most discriminating EASIX-PRE cutoff value for risk of ICU admission was the 75th percentile (2.795); for OS and NRM, it was the median value (1.703). Patients with EASIX-PRE >2.795 had higher incidence of ICU admission in comparison with patients with lower EASIX-PRE values (day +180, 35.8% vs 12.8%; HR, 2.28; P = .010). Additionally, patients with EASIX-PRE >1.073 had lower OS (2 years, 57.7% vs 68.7%; HR, 1.98; P = .006) and higher NRM (2 years, 38.7% vs 18.5%; HR, 2.92; P = .001) than patients with lower EASIX-PRE results. Log2-EASIX-PRE was not associated with incidence of transplantation-associated microangiopathy, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, or acute graft-versus-host disease. This study proposes EASIX-PRE as a prognostic tool to identify patients undergoing alloHCT at increased risk of severe organ dysfunction and who would therefore require ICU admission. Early identification of patients at high risk of severe events could contribute to personalized intervention design. Additionally, it validates the association between EASIX-PRE and OS and NRM in those undergoing alloHCT.