Background: The vitamin D receptor (VDR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) are nuclear hormone receptors of the NR1I subfamily that show contrasting patterns of cross-species variation. VDR and PXR are thought to have arisen from duplication of an ancestral gene, evident now as a single gene in the genome of the chordate invertebrateCiona intestinalis(sea squirt). VDR genes have been detected in a wide range of vertebrates including jawless fish. To date, PXR genes have not been found in cartilaginous fish. In this study, the ligand selectivities of VDRs were compared in detail across a range of vertebrate species and compared with those of theCionaVDR/PXR. In addition, several assays were used to search for evidence of PXR-mediated hepatic effects in three model non-mammalian species: sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), zebrafish (Danio rerio), and African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis).Results: Human, mouse, frog, zebrafish, and lamprey VDRs were found to have similar ligand selectivities for vitamin D derivatives. In contrast, using cultured primary hepatocytes, only zebrafish showed evidence of PXR-mediated induction of enzyme expression, with increases in testosterone 6β-hydroxylation activity (a measure of cytochrome P450 3A activity in other species) and flurbiprofen 4-hydroxylation activity (measure of cytochrome P450 2C activity) following exposure to known PXR activators. A separate assay in vivo using zebrafish demonstrated increased hepatic transcription of another PXR target, multidrug resistance gene (ABCB5), following injection of the major zebrafish bile salt, 5α-cyprinol 27-sulfate. The PXR target function, testosterone hydroxylation, was detected in frog and sea lamprey primary hepatocytes, but was not inducible in these two species by a wide range of PXR activators in other animals. Analysis of the sea lamprey draft genome also did not show evidence of a PXR gene.Conclusion: Our results show tight conservation of ligand selectivity of VDRs across vertebrate species from Agnatha to mammals. Using a functional approach, we demonstrate classic PXR-mediated effects in zebrafish, but not in sea lamprey or African clawed frog liver cells. Using a genomic approach, we failed to find evidence of a PXR gene in lamprey, suggesting that VDR may be the original NR1I gene.

This study was undertaken to characterize the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of voriconazole in adult lung transplant patients during the early postoperative period, identify factors significantly associated with various pharmacokinetic parameters, and make recommendations for adequate dosing regimens. Thirteen lung transplant patients received two intravenous infusions (6 mg/kg, twice daily [b.i.d.]) immediately posttransplant followed by oral doses (200 mg, b.i.d.) for prophylaxis. Blood samples (9/interval) were collected during one intravenous and one oral dosing interval from each patient. Voriconazole plasma concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). NONMEM was used to develop pharmacokinetic models, evaluate covariate relationships, and perform Monte Carlo simulations. There was a good correlation ( R ² = 0.98) between the area under the concentration-time curve specific for the dose evaluated (AUC _0-∞ ) and trough concentrations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data. Population estimates of bioavailability, clearance, V _c , and V _p were 45.9%, 3.45 liters/h, 54.7 liters, and 143 liters. Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) exhibited a significantly lower bioavailability (23.7%, n = 3) than non-CF patients (63.3%, n = 10). Bioavailability increased with postoperative time and reached steady levels in about 1 week. V _p increased with body weight. Bioavailability of voriconazole is substantially lower in lung transplant patients than non-transplant subjects but significantly increases with postoperative time. CF patients exhibit significantly lower bioavailability and exposure of voriconazole and therefore need higher doses. Intravenous administration of voriconazole during the first postoperative day followed by oral doses of 200 mg or 400 mg appeared to be the optimal dosing regimen. However, voriconazole levels should be monitored, and the dose should be individualized based on trough concentrations as a good measure of drug exposure.

Bioequivalence of the recently available generic tacrolimus formulation, manufactured by Sandoz, to the reference product (Prograf; Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) has been demonstrated in healthy subjects. However, the safety and efficacy of substitution with generic tacrolimus in transplant patients have not been evaluated. Tacrolimus trough concentrations and indices of liver and kidney function were recorded before and after generic substitution in 48 liver and 55 kidney transplant recipients. In liver transplant patients, the mean tacrolimus concentration/dose (C/D) ratio (±SD) was 184.1 (±123.2) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the reference product and 154.7 (±87.8) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the generic product (p < 0.05). The mean C/D-ratios in kidney transplant patients were 125.3 (±92.7) and 110.4 (±79.2) ([ng/mL]/[mg/kg/day]) for the reference and generic products, respectively (p < 0.05). Actual trough concentrations declined by an average of 1.98 ng/mL in liver and 0.87 ng/mL in kidney transplant patients following the switch, after accounting for all significant covariates. No change was observed in biochemical indices of liver or kidney function and no cases of acute rejection occurred following the substitution. These results suggest that transplant patients currently taking the reference tacrolimus formulation may be safely switched to the Sandoz-generic product provided trough concentrations are closely monitored following the substitution.