Introduction: The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) drugs has considerably improved medical management in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, although it has been reported to be ineffective in a fraction of them. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs that act as fine-tuning regulators of gene expression. Targeting miRNAs by gain or loss of function approaches have brought therapeutic effects in various disease models. The aim of this study was to investigate serum miRNA levels as predictive biomarkers of response to anti-TNFα therapy in RA patients. Methods: In total, 95 RA patients undergoing anti-TNFα/disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (anti-TNFα/DMARDs) combined treatments were enrolled. Serum samples were obtained at 0 and 6 months and therapeutic efficacy was assessed. miRNAs were isolated from the serum of 10 patients before and after anti-TNFα/DMARDs combination therapy, cDNA transcribed and pooled, and human serum miRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) arrays were performed. Subsequently, selected miRNAs were analyzed in a validation cohort consisting of 85 RA patients. Correlation studies with clinical and serological variables were also performed. Results: Ninety percent of RA patients responded to anti-TNFα/DMARDs combination therapy according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria. Array analysis showed that 91% of miRNAS were overexpressed and 9% downregulated after therapy. Functional classification revealed a preponderance of target mRNAs involved in reduction of cells maturation - especially on chondrocytes - as well as in immune and inflammatory response, cardiovascular disease, connective tissue and musculoskeletal system. Six out of ten miRNAs selected for validation were found significantly upregulated by anti-TNFα/DMARDs combination therapy (miR-16-5p, miR-23-3p, miR125b-5p, miR-126-3p, miRN-146a-5p, miR-223-3p). Only responder patients showed an increase in those miRNAs after therapy, and paralleled the reduction of TNFα, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, rheumatoid factor (RF), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Correlation studies demonstrated associations between validated miRNAs and clinical and inflammatory parameters. Further, we identified a specific plasma miRNA signature (miR-23 and miR-223) that may serve both as predictor and biomarker of response to anti-TNFα/DMARDs combination therapy. Conclusions: miRNA levels in the serum of RA patients before and after anti-TNFα/DMARDs combination therapy are potential novel biomarkers for predicting and monitoring therapy outcome.

Objective: To examine the prevalence of isolated IgA anti–β₂‐glycoprotein I (anti‐β₂GPI) positivity and the association of these antibodies, and a subgroup that bind specifically to domain IV/V of β₂GPI, with clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in 3 patient groups and to evaluate the pathogenicity of IgA anti‐β₂GPI in a mouse model of thrombosis.Methods: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from a multiethnic, multicenter cohort (LUpus in MInorities, NAture versus nurture [LUMINA]) (n = 558), patients with SLE from the Hopkins Lupus Cohort (n = 215), and serum samples referred to the Antiphospholipid Standardization Laboratory (APLS) (n = 5,098) were evaluated. IgA anti‐β₂GPI titers and binding to domain IV/V of β₂GPI were examined by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CD1 mice were inoculated with purified IgA anti‐β₂GPI antibodies, and surgical procedures and ELISAs were performed to evaluate thrombus development and tissue factor (TF) activity.Results: A total of 198 patients were found to be positive for IgA anti‐β₂GPI isotype, and 57 patients were positive exclusively for IgA anti‐β₂GPI antibodies. Of these, 13 of 23 patients (56.5%) in the LUMINA cohort, 17 of 17 patients (100%) in the Hopkins cohort, and 10 of 17 patients (58.9%) referred to APLS had at least one APS‐related clinical manifestation. Fifty‐four percent of all the IgA anti‐β₂GPI–positive serum samples reacted with domain IV/V of anti‐β₂GPI, and 77% of those had clinical features of APS. Isolated IgA anti‐β₂GPI positivity was associated with an increased risk of arterial thrombosis (P < 0.001), venous thrombosis (P = 0.015), and all thrombosis (P < 0.001). The association between isolated IgA anti‐β₂GPI and arterial thrombosis (P = 0.0003) and all thrombosis (P = 0.0003) remained significant after adjusting for other risk factors for thrombosis. In vivo mouse studies demonstrated that IgA anti‐β₂GPI antibodies induced significantly larger thrombi and higher TF levels compared to controls.Conclusion: Isolated IgA anti‐β₂GPI–positive titers may identify additional patients with clinical features of APS. Testing for these antibodies when other antiphospholipid tests are negative and APS is suspected is recommended. IgA anti‐β₂GPI antibodies directed to domain IV/V of β₂GPI represent an important subgroup of clinically relevant antiphospholipids.

Objective To determine if proinflammatory and prothrombotic biomarkers are differentially upregulated in persistently antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients, and to examine the effects of fluvastatin on these biomarkers. Methods Four groups of patients (age 18–65) were recruited: (a) primary antiphospholipid syndrome; (b) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (SLE/APS); (c) persistent aPL positivity without SLE or APS (Primary aPL); and (d) persistent aPL positivity with SLE but no APS (SLE/aPL). The frequency-matched control group, used for baseline data comparison, was identified from a databank of healthy persons. Patients received fluvastatin 40 mg daily for 3 months. At 3 months, patients stopped the study medication and they were followed for another 3 months. Blood samples for 12 proinflammatory and prothrombotic biomarkers were collected monthly for 6 months. Results Based on the comparison of the baseline samples of 41 aPL-positive patients with 30 healthy controls, 9/12 (75%) biomarkers (interleukin (IL)-6, IL1β, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-α, inducible protein-10 (IP10), soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), soluble tissue factor (sTF) and intracellular cellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1) were significantly elevated. Twenty-four patients completed the study; fluvastatin significantly and reversibly reduced the levels of 6/12 (50%) biomarkers (IL1β, VEGF, TNFα, IP10, sCD40L and sTF). Conclusions Our prospective mechanistic study demonstrates that proinflammatory and prothrombotic biomarkers, which are differentially upregulated in persistently aPL-positive patients, can be reversibly reduced by fluvastatin. Thus, statin-induced modulation of the aPL effects on target cells can be a valuable future approach in the management of aPL-positive patients.

Objective To identify shared and differential molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (AT) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and APS associated with SLE (APS plus SLE). Methods 129 patients (42 APS, 31 APS plus SLE and 56 SLE) and 61 healthy donors were included. Microarray expression profiling was performed in monocytes. RT-PCR of selected genes and western blot were used to validate microarray data. Clinical and inflammatory parameters were also analysed. Results Compared with controls, 555, 1224 and 518 genes were differentially expressed in monocytes from SLE, APS plus SLE and APS patients, respectively. Approximately 25–30% of differentially expressed genes were related to AT and CVD. Each disease displayed a specific AT/CVD/Inflammation-related gene signature. Compared with SLE, APS showed alterations in mitochondria biogenesis and function and oxidative stress. Besides the interferon signature, found in APS plus SLE and SLE patients, various genes mediating atherosclerotic/inflammatory signalling were also differentially expressed in APS plus SLE. IgG-anticardiolipin (aCL) titres independently predicted both atherosclerotic and thrombosis in APS plus SLE. Moreover, a significant correlation of IgG-aCL titres with mRNA levels of certain inflammatory molecules in monocytes was further noticed. In vitro treatment of monocytes with IgG-aCL promoted an increase in the expression of the genes most significantly changed in APS plus SLE versus healthy donors. Conclusions Gene expression profiling allows the segregation of APS, APS plus SLE and SLE, with specific signatures explaining the pro-atherosclerotic and pro-thrombotic alterations in these highly related autoimmune diseases.