Breast cancer is the second most common origin of brain metastasis after lung cancer. Brain metastasis in breast cancer is commonly found in patients with advanced course disease and has a poor prognosis because the blood–brain barrier is thought to be a major obstacle to the delivery of many drugs in the central nervous system. Therefore, local treatments including surgery, stereotactic radiation therapy, and whole-brain radiation therapy are currently considered the gold standard treatments. Meanwhile, new targeted therapies based on subtype have recently been developed. Some drugs can exceed the blood–brain barrier and enter the central nervous system. New technology for early detection and personalized medicine for metastasis are warranted. In this review, we summarize the historical overview of treatment with a focus on local treatment, the latest drug treatment strategies, and future perspectives using novel therapeutic agents for breast cancer patients with brain metastasis, including ongoing clinical trials.

The occurrence of iatrogenic tumor cell seeding (seeding) in needle tract scars formed by core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is well known. Some risk factors for seeding have been reported, but the clinicopathological risk factors and its prognosis have not been fully investigated. We evaluated the clinical features and prognosis of seeding. We included 4405 patients who had undergone surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy) with a diagnosis of breast cancer by preoperative CNB or VAB at our hospital between January 2012 and February 2021. Data of patients with confirmed presence of seeding in resected specimens were collected from pathological records. We analyzed the risk factors of seeding using logistic regression analysis and compared the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate between cases based on the presence or absence of seeding in the lumpectomy group. Of the 4405 patients, 133 (3.0%) had confirmed seeding. Univariate analysis revealed the association of clinicopathological features of seeding with lower nuclear grade (NG1 vs NG2-3; p = 0.043), lower Ki-67 (<30 vs. ≥30; p = 0.049), estrogen receptor (ER) positivity (positive vs negative; p<0.01), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negativity (negative vs positive; p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed ER positivity (odds ratio, 5.23; p<0.05) as an independent risk factor of seeding. The IBTR rate was not significantly different between the seeding and non-seeding groups. Seeding was more likely to occur in ER positive, HER2 negative carcinomas with less aggressive features, and may remain subclinical if adequate adjuvant treatments are administered.