Brian J. Anderson

Dr. Brian J. Anderson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2008 in Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BABrian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson
NHNick Holford
Nick Holford
Growth and development can be investigated using readily observable demographic factors such as weight and age. Size is the primary covariate and can be referenced to a 70-kg person with allometry using a coefficient of 0.75 for clearance and 1 for volume. The use of these coefficients is supported by fractal geometric concepts and observations from diverse areas in biology. Fat free mass (FFM) might be expected to do better than total body weight when there are wide variations in fat affecting body composition. Clearance pathways develop in the fetus before birth. The use of postnatal age as a descriptor of maturation is unsatisfactory because birth may occur prematurely; therefore postmenstrual age is a superior predictor of elimination function. A sigmoid Emaxmodel (Hill equation) describes gradual maturation of clearance in early life leading to a mature adult clearance achieved at a later age.

1 January 2009 in Pediatric Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMalin M. Rhodin
Malin M. Rhodin
BABrian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson
APA. Michael Peters
A. Michael Peters
MCMalcolm G. Coulthard
Malcolm G. Coulthard
BWBarry Wilkins
Barry Wilkins
NHNick Holford
Nick Holford

2 September 2008 in Pediatric Anesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BABrian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson

5 July 2013 in Archives of Disease in Childhood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BABrian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson
NHNick Holford
Nick Holford
Paediatric dose cannot be scaled down directly from an adult using weight (eg, mg/kg). This results in a dose too small in infants and children because elimination does not change in direct proportion to weight, and a dose too large in neonates whose drug elimination pathways are immature. The goal of treatment is a desired response (the target effect). An understanding of the concentration–response relationship (pharmacodynamics) can be used to predict the target concentration required to achieve this target effect. Pharmacokinetic knowledge then determines the target dose that will achieve the target concentration. Variability associated with both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics can be reduced by demographic information (covariates), which can be used to help predict the target dose in a specific child. The covariates of size, maturation and organ function are the three principle contributors to pharmacokinetic variability. Children (2 years postnatal age or older) are essentially similar to adults (ie, mature) and differ only in size. Maturation processes are only important in neonates and infants, therefore, this cohort can be viewed as immature children. Paediatric pharmacodynamic studies are fewer than pharmacokinetic studies, but are required to elucidate the target concentration and consequent dose. The lack of pharmacodynamic studies is a serious challenge for rational dosing.

29 June 2006 in European Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BABrian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson
Karel AllegaertKarel Allegaert
Karel Allegaert
NHNicholas H. G. Holford
Nicholas H. G. Holford

15 February 2011 in Pediatric Anesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BABrian J. Anderson
Brian J. Anderson
NHNick Holford
Nick Holford