The study compares the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL) with that of the former radiologist reading of the Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade and evaluates whether additional patient data can improve the diagnostic performance of DL. From March 2003 to February 2017, 3000 patients with 4366 knee AP radiographs were randomly selected. DL was trained using knee images and clinical information in two stages. In the first stage, DL was trained only with images and then in the second stage, it was trained with image data and clinical information. In the test set of image data, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)s of the DL algorithm in diagnosing KL 0 to KL 4 were 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88–0.95), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76–0.84), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64–0.73), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83–0.89), and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94–0.98), respectively. In the test set with image data and additional patient information, the AUCs of the DL algorithm in diagnosing KL 0 to KL 4 were 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–0.74), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66–0.73), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79–0.85), and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91–0.97), respectively. The diagnostic performance of image data with additional patient information showed a statistically significantly higher AUC than image data alone in diagnosing KL 0, 1, and 2 (p-values were 0.008, 0.020, and 0.027, respectively).The diagnostic performance of DL was comparable to that of the former radiologist reading of the knee osteoarthritis KL grade. Additional patient information improved DL diagnosis in interpreting early knee osteoarthritis.

Accurate image interpretation of Waters’ and Caldwell view radiographs used for sinusitis screening is challenging. Therefore, we developed a deep learning algorithm for diagnosing frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinusitis on both Waters’ and Caldwell views. The datasets were selected for the training and validation set (n = 1403, sinusitis% = 34.3%) and the test set (n = 132, sinusitis% = 29.5%) by temporal separation. The algorithm can simultaneously detect and classify each paranasal sinus using both Waters’ and Caldwell views without manual cropping. Single- and multi-view models were compared. Our proposed algorithm satisfactorily diagnosed frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinusitis on both Waters’ and Caldwell views (area under the curve (AUC), 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.80), 0.78 (0.72–0.85), and 0.88 (0.84–0.92), respectively). The one-sided DeLong’s test was used to compare the AUCs, and the Obuchowski–Rockette model was used to pool the AUCs of the radiologists. The algorithm yielded a higher AUC than radiologists for ethmoid and maxillary sinusitis (p = 0.012 and 0.013, respectively). The multi-view model also exhibited a higher AUC than the single Waters’ view model for maxillary sinusitis (p = 0.038). Therefore, our algorithm showed diagnostic performances comparable to radiologists and enhanced the value of radiography as a first-line imaging modality in assessing multiple sinusitis.

Weight bearing whole-leg radiograph (WLR) is essential to assess lower limb alignment such as weight bearing line (WBL) ratio. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) model that predicts the WBL ratio using knee standing AP alone. Total of 3997 knee AP & WLRs were used. WBL ratio was used for labeling and analysis of prediction accuracy. The WBL ratio was divided into seven categories (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6). After training, performance of the DL model was evaluated. Final performance was evaluated using 386 subjects as a test set. Cumulative score (CS) within error range 0.1 was set with showing maximum CS in the validation set (95% CI, 0.924–0.970). In the test set, mean absolute error was 0.054 (95% CI, 0.048–0.061) and CS was 0.951 (95% CI, 0.924–0.970). Developed DL algorithm could predict the WBL ratio on knee standing AP alone with comparable accuracy as the degree primary physician can assess the alignment. It can be the basis for developing an automated lower limb alignment assessment tool that can be used easily and cost-effectively in primary clinics.