CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated) systems are widespread in archaea and bacteria, and research on their molecular mechanisms has led to the development of genome-editing techniques based on a few Type II systems. However, there has not been any report on harnessing a Type I or Type III system for genome editing. Here, a method was developed to repurpose both CRISPR-Cas systems for genetic manipulation in Sulfolobus islandicus, a thermophilic archaeon. A novel type of genome-editing plasmid (pGE) was constructed, carrying an artificial mini-CRISPR array and a donor DNA containing a non-target sequence. Transformation of a pGE plasmid would yield two alternative fates to transformed cells: wild-type cells are to be targeted for chromosomal DNA degradation, leading to cell death, whereas those carrying the mutant gene would survive the cell killing and selectively retained as transformants. Using this strategy, different types of mutation were generated, including deletion, insertion and point mutations. We envision this method is readily applicable to different bacteria and archaea that carry an active CRISPR-Cas system of DNA interference provided the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) of an uncharacterized PAM-dependent CRISPR-Cas system can be predicted by bioinformatic analysis.

Gene editing technology involves the modification of a specific target gene to obtain a new function or phenotype. Recent advances in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas-mediated technologies have provided an efficient tool for genetic engineering of cells and organisms. Here, we review the three emerging gene editing tools (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas) and briefly introduce the principle, classification, and mechanisms of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Strategies for gene editing based on endogenous and exogenous CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as the novel base editor (BE), prime editor (PE), and CRISPR-associated transposase (CAST) technologies, are described in detail. In addition, we summarize recent developments in the application of CRISPR-based gene editing tools for industrial microorganism and probiotics modifications. Finally, the potential challenges and future perspectives of CRISPR-based gene editing tools are discussed.

Acquisition of de novo spacer sequences confers CRISPR-Cas with a memory to defend against invading genetic elements. However, the mechanism of regulation of CRISPR spacer acquisition remains unknown. Here we examine the transcriptional regulation of the conserved spacer acquisition genes in Type I-A of Sulfolobus islandicus REY15A. Csa3a, a MarR-like transcription factor encoded by the gene located adjacent to csa1, cas1, cas2 and cas4 cluster, but on the reverse strand, was demonstrated to specifically bind to the csa1 and cas1 promoters with the imperfect palindromic sequence. Importantly, it was demonstrated that the transcription level of csa1, cas1, cas2 and cas4 was significantly enhanced in a csa3a-overexpression strain and, moreover, the Csa1 and Cas1 protein levels were increased in this strain. Furthermore, we demonstrated the hyperactive uptake of unique spacers within both CRISPR loci in the presence of the csa3a overexpression vector. The spacer acquisition process is dependent on the CCN PAM sequence and protospacer selection is random and non-directional. These results suggested a regulation mechanism of CRISPR spacer acquisition where a single transcriptional regulator senses the presence of an invading element and then activates spacer acquisition gene expression which leads to de novo spacer uptake from the invading element.

CRISPR–Cas system provides the adaptive immunity against invading genetic elements in prokaryotes. Recently, we demonstrated that Csa3a regulator mediates spacer acquisition in Sulfolobus islandicus by activating the expression of Type I-A adaptation cas genes. However, links between the activation of spacer adaptation and CRISPR transcription/processing, and the requirement for DNA repair genes during spacer acquisition remained poorly understood. Here, we demonstrated that de novo spacer acquisition required Csa1, Cas1, Cas2 and Cas4 proteins of the Sulfolobus Type I-A system. Disruption of genes implicated in crRNA maturation or DNA interference led to a significant accumulation of acquired spacers, mainly derived from host genomic DNA. Transcriptome and proteome analyses showed that Csa3a activated expression of adaptation cas genes, CRISPR RNAs, and DNA repair genes, including herA helicase, nurA nuclease and DNA polymerase II genes. Importantly, Csa3a specifically bound the promoters of the above DNA repair genes, suggesting that they were directly activated by Csa3a for adaptation. The Csa3a regulator also specifically bound to the leader sequence to activate CRISPR transcription in vivo. Our data indicated that the Csa3a regulator couples transcriptional activation of the CRISPR–Cas system and DNA repair genes for spacer adaptation and efficient interference of invading genetic elements.