Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems allow people to send messages or commands without moving, and hence can provide an alternative communication and control channel for people with limited motor function. In this study, we demonstrate a BCI system for orthosis control. Our BCI was asynchronous, meaning that subjects could move the orthosis whenever they wanted, instead of pacing themselves to external cues. Seven subjects each performed two tasks with a BCI that relied on steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). Although none of the subjects had any training, six subjects showed good control with a positive predictive value (PPV) higher than 60%. The overall PPV for all subjects reached 78% ±10%. However, the false positive rate was high, and some subjects dislike the flickering lights required in SSVEP BCIs. In follow-up work, we hope to reduce both the false positive rate and the annoyance produced by flickering lights by hybridizing this BCI with a “brain switch,” which could allow people to turn the SSVEP system on or off using a second type of brain activity when they do not wish to control the orthosis. We also hope to validate this approach with people with tetraplegia.

A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) provides a completely new output pathway that can provide an additional option for a person to express himself/her self if he/she suffers a disorder like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), brainstem stroke, brain or spinal cord injury or other diseases which impair the function of the common output pathways which are responsible for the control of muscles. For a P300 based BCI a matrix of randomly flashing characters is presented to the participant. To spell a character the person has to attend to it and to count how many times the character flashes. Although most BCIs are designed to help people with disabilities, they are mainly tested on healthy, young subjects who may achieve better results than people with impairments. In this study we compare measurements, performed on people suffering motor impairments, such as stroke or ALS, to measurements performed on healthy people. The overall accuracy of the persons with motor impairments reached 70.1% in comparison to 91% obtained for the group of healthy subjects. When looking at single subjects, one interesting example shows that under certain circumstances, when it is difficult for a patient to concentrate on one character for a longer period of time, the accuracy is higher when fewer flashes (i.e., stimuli) are presented. Furthermore, the influence of several tuning parameters is discussed as it shows that for some participants adaptations for achieving valuable spelling results are required. Finally, exclusion criteria for people who are not able to use the device are defined.

Portable neuroimaging technologies can be employed for long-term monitoring of neurophysiological and neuropathological states. Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Electroencephalography (EEG) are highly suited for such a purpose. Their multimodal integration allows the evaluation of hemodynamic and electrical brain activity together with neurovascular coupling. An innovative fNIRS-EEG system is here presented. The system integrated a novel continuous-wave fNIRS component and a modified commercial EEG device. fNIRS probing relied on fiberless technology based on light emitting diodes and silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). SiPMs are sensitive semiconductor detectors, whose large detection area maximizes photon harvesting from the scalp and overcomes limitations of fiberless technology. To optimize the signal-to-noise ratio and avoid fNIRS-EEG interference, a digital lock-in was implemented for fNIRS signal acquisition. A benchtop characterization of the fNIRS component showed its high performances with a noise equivalent power below 1 pW. Moreover, the fNIRS-EEG device was tested in vivo during tasks stimulating visual, motor and pre-frontal cortices. Finally, the capabilities to perform ecological recordings were assessed in clinical settings on one Alzheimer’s Disease patient during long-lasting cognitive tests. The system can pave the way to portable technologies for accurate evaluation of multimodal brain activity, allowing their extensive employment in ecological environments and clinical practice.

Neurorehabilitation with robotic devices requires a paradigm shift to enhance human-robot interaction. The coupling of robot assisted gait training (RAGT) with a brain-machine interface (BMI) represents an important step in this direction but requires better elucidation of the effect of RAGT on the user’s neural modulation. Here, we investigated how different exoskeleton walking modes modify brain and muscular activity during exoskeleton assisted gait. We recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic (EMG) activity from ten able-bodied volunteers walking with an exoskeleton with three modes of user assistance (i.e., transparent, adaptive and full assistance) and during free overground gait. Results identified that exoskeleton walking (irrespective of the exoskeleton mode) induces a stronger modulation of central mid-line mu (8–13 Hz) and low-beta (14–20 Hz) rhythms compared to free overground walking. These modifications are accompanied by a significant re-organization of the EMG patterns in exoskeleton walking. On the other hand, we observed no significant differences in neural activity during exoskeleton walking with the different assistance levels. We subsequently implemented four gait classifiers based on deep neural networks trained on the EEG data during the different walking conditions. Our hypothesis was that exoskeleton modes could impact the creation of a BMI-driven RAGT. We demonstrated that all classifiers achieved an average accuracy of 84.13 ± 3.49% in classifying swing and stance phases on their respective datasets. In addition, we demonstrated that the classifier trained on the transparent mode exoskeleton data can classify gait phases during adaptive and full modes with an accuracy of 78.3 ± 4.8%, while the classifier trained on free overground walking data fails to classify the gait during exoskeleton walking (accuracy of 59.4 ± 11.8%). These findings provide important insights into the effect of robotic training on neural activity and contribute to the advancement of BMI technology for improving robotic gait rehabilitation therapy.

This article investigated the automatic recognition of felt and musically communicated emotions using electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG), and acoustic signals, which were recorded from eleven musicians instructed to perform music in order to communicate happiness, sadness, relaxation, and anger. Musicians' self-reports indicated that the emotions they musically expressed were highly consistent with those they actually felt. Results showed that the best classification performances, in a subject-dependent classification using a KNN classifier were achieved by using features derived from both the EEG and ECG (with an accuracy of 98.11%). Which was significantly more accurate than using ECG features alone, but was not significantly more accurate than using EEG features alone. The use of acoustic features alone or in combination with EEG and/or ECG features did not lead to better performances than those achieved with EEG plus ECG or EEG alone. Our results suggest that emotion detection of playing musicians, both felt and musically communicated, when coherent, can be classified in a more reliable way using physiological features than involving acoustic features. The reported machine learning results are a step toward the development of affective brain–computer interfaces capable of automatically inferring the emotions of a playing musician in real-time.

The evaluation of the level of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) is primarily based on behavioural assessments. Patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) do not show any sign of awareness of their environment, while minimally conscious state (MCS) patients show reproducible but fluctuating signs of awareness. Some patients, although with remaining cognitive abilities, are not able to exhibit overt voluntary responses at the bedside and may be misdiagnosed as UWS. Several studies investigated functional neuroimaging and neurophysiology as an additional tool to evaluate the level of consciousness and to detect covert command following in DOC. Most of these studies are based on auditory stimulation, neglecting patients suffering from decreased or absent hearing abilities. In the present study, we aim to assess the response to a P3-based paradigm in 40 patients with DOC and 12 healthy participants using auditory (AEP) and vibrotactile (VTP) stimulation. To this end, an EEG-based brain-computer interface was used at DOC patient’s bedside. We compared the significance of the P3 performance (i.e., the interpretation of significance of the evoked P3 response) as obtained by ‘direct processing’ (i.e., theoretical-based significance threshold) and ‘offline processing’ (i.e., permutation-based single subject level threshold). We evaluated whether the P3 performances were dependent on clinical variables such as diagnosis (UWS and MCS), aetiology and time since injury. Last we tested the dependency of AEP and VTP performances at the single subject level. Direct processing tends to overestimate P3 performance. We did not find any difference in the presence of a P3 performance according to the level of consciousness (UWS vs. MCS) or the aetiology (traumatic vs. non-traumatic brain injury). The performance achieved at the AEP paradigm was independent from what was achieved at the VTP paradigm, indicating that some patients performed better on the AEP task while others performed better on the VTP task. Our results support the importance of using multimodal approaches in the assessment of DOC patients in order to optimise the evaluation of patient’s abilities.