O. Joseph Bienvenu

Dr. O. Joseph Bienvenu

Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. - Meyer 115, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2012 in Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DNDale M. Needham
Dale M. Needham
JDJudy E. Davidson
Judy E. Davidson
HCHenry Cohen
Henry Cohen
RHRamona O. Hopkins
Ramona O. Hopkins
CWCraig Weinert
Craig Weinert
MHMaurene A. Harvey
Maurene A. Harvey
Millions of patients are discharged from intensive care units annually. These intensive care survivors and their families frequently report a wide range of impairments in their health status which may last for months and years after hospital discharge. To report on a 2-day Society of Critical Care Medicine conference aimed at improving the long-term outcomes after critical illness for patients and their families. Thirty-one invited stakeholders participated in the conference. Stakeholders represented key professional organizations and groups, predominantly from North America, which are involved in the care of intensive care survivors after hospital discharge. Invited experts and Society of Critical Care Medicine members presented a summary of existing data regarding the potential long-term physical, cognitive and mental health problems after intensive care and the results from studies of postintensive care unit interventions to address these problems. Stakeholders provided reactions, perspectives, concerns and strategies aimed at improving care and mitigating these long-term health problems. Three major themes emerged from the conference regarding: (1) raising awareness and education, (2) understanding and addressing barriers to practice, and (3) identifying research gaps and resources. Postintensive care syndrome was agreed upon as the recommended term to describe new or worsening problems in physical, cognitive, or mental health status arising after a critical illness and persisting beyond acute care hospitalization. The term could be applied to either a survivor or family member. Improving care for intensive care survivors and their families requires collaboration between practitioners and researchers in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. Strategies were developed to address the major themes arising from the conference to improve outcomes for survivors and families.

22 June 2018 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThe Brainstorm Consortium
The Brainstorm Consortium
VAVerneri Anttila
Verneri Anttila
BBBrendan Bulik-Sullivan
Brendan Bulik-Sullivan
HFHilary K. Finucane
Hilary K. Finucane
RWRaymond K. Walters
Raymond K. Walters
BNBenjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale
Brainstorming diseases: Consistent classification of neuropsychiatric diseases is problematic because it can lead to misunderstanding of etiology. The Brainstorm Consortium examined multiple genome-wide association studies drawn from more than 200,000 patients for 25 brain-associated disorders and 17 phenotypes. Broadly, it appears that psychiatric and neurologic disorders share relatively little common genetic risk. However, different and independent pathways can result in similar clinical manifestations (e.g., psychosis, which occurs in both schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease). Schizophrenia correlated with many psychiatric disorders, whereas the immunopathological affliction Crohn's disease did not, and posttraumatic stress syndrome was also largely independent of underlying traits. Essentially, the earlier the onset of a disorder, the more inheritable it appeared to be. Science , this issue p. eaap8757

1 February 2012 in Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJudy E. Davidson
Judy E. Davidson
CJChristina Jones
Christina Jones
OBO. Joseph Bienvenu
O. Joseph Bienvenu
The family response to critical illness includes development of adverse psychological outcomes such as anxiety, acute stress disorder, posttraumatic stress, depression, and complicated grief. This cluster of complications from exposure to critical care is now entitled postintensive care syndrome-family. Adverse psychological outcomes occur in parents of neonatal and pediatric patients and in family members of adult patients, and may be present for >4 yrs after intensive care unit discharge. Psychological repercussions of critical illness affect the family member's ability to fully engage in necessary care-giving functions after hospitalization. It has been suggested that the manner in which healthcare workers communicate with family members and the way in which families are included in care and decision-making, may affect long-term outcomes. Preventive strategies for optimal communication and inclusion in care are reviewed. Many tools are available to assess the risk for and to diagnose postintensive care syndrome-family conditions during hospitalization and at intervals after discharge. Visits after discharge, support groups, and clinics have been proposed for assessing the need for professional referrals as well as for treating family members when psychological illness persists. Studies evaluating these measures are reviewed.

1 May 2015 in Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAnn M. Parker
Ann M. Parker
TSThiti Sricharoenchai
Thiti Sricharoenchai
SRSandeep Raparla
Sandeep Raparla
KSKyle W. Schneck
Kyle W. Schneck
OBO. Joseph Bienvenu
O. Joseph Bienvenu
DNDale M. Needham
Dale M. Needham
To conduct a systematic review and metaanalysis of the prevalence, risk factors, and prevention/treatment strategies for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in critical illness survivors. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library from inception through March 5, 2014. Eligible studies met the following criteria: 1) adult general/nonspecialty ICU, 2) validated posttraumatic stress disorder instrument greater than or equal to 1 month post-ICU, and 3) sample size greater than or equal to 10 patients. Duplicate independent review and data abstraction from all eligible titles/abstracts/full-text articles. The search identified 2,817 titles/abstracts, with 40 eligible articles on 36 unique cohorts (n = 4,260 patients). The Impact of Event Scale was the most common posttraumatic stress disorder instrument. Between 1 and 6 months post-ICU (six studies; n = 456), the pooled mean (95% CI) Impact of Event Scale score was 20 (17-24), and the pooled prevalences of clinically important posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (95% CI) were 25% (18-34%) and 44% (36-52%) using Impact of Event Scale thresholds greater than or equal to 35 and greater than or equal to 20, respectively. Between 7 and 12 months post-ICU (five studies; n = 698), the pooled mean Impact of Event Scale score was 17 (9-24), and pooled prevalences of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms were 17% (10-26%) and 34% (22-50%), respectively. ICU risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms included benzodiazepine administration and post-ICU memories of frightening ICU experiences. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms were associated with worse quality of life. In European-based studies: 1) an ICU diary was associated with a significant reduction in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, 2) a self-help rehabilitation manual was associated with significant posttraumatic stress disorder symptom reduction at 2 months, but not 6 months; and 3) a nurse-led ICU follow-up clinic did not reduce posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Clinically important posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms occurred in one fifth of critical illness survivors at 1-year follow-up, with higher prevalence in those who had comorbid psychopathology, received benzodiazepines, and had early memories of frightening ICU experiences. In European studies, ICU diaries reduced posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.

1 September 2008 in General Hospital Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDimitry S. Davydow
Dimitry S. Davydow
JGJeneen M. Gifford
Jeneen M. Gifford
SDSanjay V. Desai
Sanjay V. Desai
DNDale M. Needham
Dale M. Needham
OBO. Joseph Bienvenu
O. Joseph Bienvenu

1 April 2000 in Archives of General Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GNGerald Nestadt
Gerald Nestadt
JSJack Samuels
Jack Samuels
MRMark Riddle
Mark Riddle
OBO. Joseph Bienvenu
O. Joseph Bienvenu
KLKung-Yee Liang
Kung-Yee Liang
RHRudolf Hoehn-Saric
Rudolf Hoehn-Saric
OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric condition first described more than 100 years ago.1 The pathognomonic features of the disorder are persistent, intrusive, senseless thoughts and impulses (obsessions) and repetitive, intentional behaviors (compulsions). Patients with the disorder recognize that their thoughts and behaviors are excessive and unreasonable, and they struggle to resist them. The lifetime prevalence of OCD is estimated to be 1% to 3%, based on population-based surveys conducted in many communities nationally and internationally.2,3 Although the disorder affects individuals of all ages, the period of greatest risk is from childhood to middle adulthood4,5 Patients experience a chronic or episodic course with exacerbations that can substantially impair social, occupational, and academic functioning; according to the World Health Organization, OCD is among the 10 most disabling medical conditions worldwide.6