Hani Al-Hashmi

Dr. Hani Al-Hashmi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NANawal AlShehry
Nawal AlShehry
SZSyed Ziauddin A Zaidi
Syed Ziauddin A Zaidi
AAAhmed AlAskar
Ahmed AlAskar
AOAbdurahman Al Odayani
Abdurahman Al Odayani
JAJawaher Mubarak Alotaibi
Jawaher Mubarak Alotaibi
HAHani Al-Hashmi
Hani Al-Hashmi
Objective: To present the interim findings from a national study investigating the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) containing detectable IgG antibodies as a treatment strategy for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Trial Design and Participants: An open label, two-arm, phase-II clinical trial conducted across 22 hospitals from Saudi Arabia. The intervention group included 40 adults (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed severe COVID-19 and the control group included 124 patients matched using propensity score for age, gender, intubation status, and history of diabetes and/or hypertension. Intervention group included those (a) with severe symptoms (dyspnea; respiratory rate, ≥30/min; SpO2, ≤93%, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, 50% within 24–48 h), (b) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) care or (c) experiencing life-threatening conditions. The control group included confirmed severe COVID-19 patients of similar characteristics who did not consent for CP infusion or were not able to receive CP due to its nonavailability. Interventions: The intervention group participants were infused 300 ml (200–400 ml/treatment dose) CP at least once, and if required, daily for up to 5 sessions, along with receiving the best standard of care. The control group only received the best standard of care. Outcomes: The primary endpoints were safety and ICU length of stay (LOS). The secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, days on mechanical ventilation and days to clinical recovery. Results: CP transfusion did not result in any adverse effects. There was no difference in the ICU LOS (median 8 days in both groups). The mortality risk was lower in the CP group: 13% absolute risk reduction (P = 0.147), hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.554 (0.299–1.027; P = 0.061) by log-rank test. There was no significant difference in the days on mechanical ventilation and days to clinical recovery. Conclusion: CP containing detectable antibodies is a safe strategy and may result in a decrease in mortality in patients with severe COVID-19. The results of the completed trial with a larger study sample would provide more clarity if this difference in mortality is significant. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04347681; Saudi Clinical Trials Registry No.: 20041102.

1 October 2020 in JMIR Research Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMohammed Abdul Hameed Albelowi
Mohammed Abdul Hameed Albelowi
SZSyed Ziauddin A Zaidi
Syed Ziauddin A Zaidi
NANawal AlShehry
Nawal AlShehry
AAAhmed AlAskar
Ahmed AlAskar
Abdul Rehman Zia ZaidiAbdul Rehman Zia Zaidi
Abdul Rehman Zia Zaidi
HAHani Al-Hashmi
Hani Al-Hashmi
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to cause significant morbidity and mortality. The development of an effective vaccine will take several months to become available, and its affordability is unpredictable. Transfusion of convalescent plasma (CP) may provide passive immunity. Based on initial data from China, a group of hematologists, infectious disease specialists, and intensivists drafted this protocol in March 2020. Objective: The aim of this study is to test the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of CP in treating patients with COVID-19 across Saudi Arabia. Methods: Eligible patients with COVID-19 will be recruited for CP infusion according to the inclusion criteria. As COVID-19 has proven to be a moving target as far as its management is concerned, we will use current definitions according to the Ministry of Health (MOH) guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. All CP recipients will receive supportive management including all available recommended therapies according to the available MOH guidelines. Eligible CP donors will be patients with COVID-19 who have fully recovered from their disease according to MOH recovery criteria as detailed in the inclusion criteria. CP donors have to qualify as blood donors according to MOH regulations except for the history of COVID-19 in the recent past. We will also test the CP donors for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by a rapid test, and aliquots will be archived for future antibody titration. Due to the perceived benefit of CP, randomization was not considered. However, we will compare the outcome of the cohort treated with CP with those who did not receive CP due to a lack of consent or lack of availability. In this national collaborative study, there is a likelihood of not finding exactly matched control group patients. Hence, we plan to perform a propensity score matching of the CP recipients with the comparator group patients for the major characteristics. We plan to collect demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of both groups and compare the outcomes. A total sample size of 575 patients, 115 CP recipients and 460 matched controls (1:4 ratio), will be sufficient to detect a clinically important hospital stay and 30-day mortality difference between the two groups with 80% power and a 5% level of significance. Results: At present, patient recruitment is still ongoing, and the interim analysis of the first 40 patients will be shared soon. Conclusions: In this paper, we present a protocol for a national collaborative multicenter phase II study in Saudi Arabia for assessing the feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of CP in treating patients with severe COVID-19. We plan to publish an interim report of the first 40 CP recipients and their matched comparators soon.

21 January 2020 in Bone Marrow Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HAHani Al-Hashmi
Hani Al-Hashmi
AAAhmed Alsagheir
Ahmed Alsagheir
AEAnalie Estanislao
Analie Estanislao
JBJenifer Bacal
Jenifer Bacal
AAAshraf Alsuhebah
Ashraf Alsuhebah
PKPanayotis Kaloyannidis
Panayotis Kaloyannidis

25 October 2022 in Journal of Blood Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPanayotis Kaloyannidis
Panayotis Kaloyannidis
FAFatema Abdulla
Fatema Abdulla
EMEnas Mutahar
Enas Mutahar
HHHaidar Al Hashim
Haidar Al Hashim
SHSalman Al Harbi
Salman Al Harbi
HAHani Al-Hashmi
Hani Al-Hashmi
Introduction: The optimal treatment for young patients with high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains a challenge. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 58 NDMM patients younger than 55 years treated in our center from 2010 to 2021 with the current recommended protocols. Results: After a median follow-up of 48 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached; however, approximately 25% of them died within 4 years after diagnosis. Advanced disease stage, presence of extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, and less than very good remission before autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation adversely affected patient survival. Based on these factors, we created a risk-assessment scoring system that sufficiently discriminated young NDMM patients at risk of poor outcome. The 4-year OS was superior for patients with zero to two factors to those with three to five factors (86% vs 44%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: The proposed scoring system could be reliably used at diagnosis and at interim disease evaluation in aiming for personalized treatment for young NDMM patients.