Penile cancer is an extremely rare malignancy that accounts for approximately 1% of cancer deaths in the United States every year. While primary penile cancer can be managed surgically, advanced and metastatic forms of the disease require more aggressive management plans with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Despite the meaningful response to systemic treatments, the 2-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival have shown disappointing results. Therefore, there is a crucial need for alternative treatment options with more favorable outcomes and a lower toxicity profile. There are currently extensive studies of tumor molecular biology and clinical trials with targeted molecular therapies, such as PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. In this review, we will describe the penile cancer microenvironment, and summarize the rationale for immunotherapy in penile cancer patients.

Novel therapeutic strategies are needed for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft-tissue sarcoma in children. By using a combination of cell surface proteomics and transcriptomic profiling of RMS and normal muscle, we generated a catalog of targetable cell surface proteins enriched in RMS tumors. Among the top candidates, we identified B7-H3 as the major immunoregulatory molecule expressed by RMS tumors. By using a large cohort of tissue specimens, we demonstrated that B7-H3 is expressed in a majority of RMS tumors while not detected in normal human tissues. Through a deconvolution analysis of the RMS tumor RNA-seq data, we showed that B7-H3-rich tumors are enriched in macrophages M1, NK cells, and depleted in CD8⁺-T cells. Furthermore, in vitro functional assays showed that B7-H3 knockout in RMS tumor cells increases T-cell mediated cytotoxicity. Altogether, our study uncovers new potential targets for the treatment of RMS and provides the first biological insights into the role of B7-H3 in RMS biology, paving the way for the development of next-generation immunotherapies.

Prostate cancer lung metastasis represents a clinical conundrum due to its implications for advanced disease progression and the complexities it introduces in treatment planning. As the disease progresses to distant sites such as the lung, the clinical management becomes increasingly intricate, requiring tailored therapeutic strategies to address the unique characteristics of metastatic lesions. This review seeks to synthesize the current state of knowledge surrounding prostate cancer metastasis to the lung, shedding light on the diverse array of clinical presentations encountered, ranging from subtle radiological findings to overt symptomatic manifestations. By examining the diagnostic modalities utilized in identifying this metastasis, including advanced imaging techniques and histopathological analyses, this review aims to provide insights into the diagnostic landscape and the challenges associated with accurately characterizing lung metastatic lesions in prostate cancer patients. Moreover, this review delves into the nuances of therapeutic interventions employed in managing prostate cancer lung metastasis, encompassing systemic treatments such as hormonal therapies and chemotherapy, as well as metastasis-directed therapies including surgery and radiotherapy.

Visceral metastatic disease in prostate cancer patients conveys a poor prognosis. Using advanced imaging techniques, studies have demonstrated increasing detection rates of visceral metastasis. Visceral metastases are now seen in up to 30–60% of prostate cancer patients. Survival patterns of site-specific visceral metastasis are described poorly in the literature. Here, we sought to investigate survival patterns in prostate cancer patients according to their first detected site of visceral metastasis. Retrospectively, we identified 203 prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases from the Mayo Clinic Advanced Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into three groups according to the first site of visceral metastases detected: lung, brain, or liver. Visceral metastases were detected primarily on either metabolic imaging (C-11 choline) or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography (CT) scan. Confirmation of visceral metastasis diagnosis was established with either biopsy when feasible or focused conventional imaging, including focused CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression model was conducted to assess different variables that affect overall and cancer-specific survival. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 16.2 (3.9–49.8) mo, the overall and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort suggests better survival patterns in patients with first-site lung metastases than in patients with first-site brain or liver metastases (p < 0.0001). In univariate and multivariate analyses of factors impacting patients’ overall and cancer-specific survival, a high prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis of visceral metastasis, concomitant bone and lymph node disease, and more than four visceral metastases were associated with poor overall and cancer-specific survival (p < 0.05). On the contrary, first-site lung metastasis was associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival, compared with first-site liver and brain metastases (p < 0.001). These data suggest that prostate cancer patients with visceral metastatic disease have varying survival patterns according to first-site detected visceral metastasis. In our cohort, patients with first-site lung metastasis demonstrated better survival outcomes than patients with first-site brain or liver metastasis. Our study explored the survival outcomes among patients with visceral metastatic prostate cancer employing cutting-edge imaging methods. Prostate cancer patients with metastases to different organs have different survival rates. Patients with cancer spreading to the lungs first showed better survival than those with cancer spreading to the brain or liver first.

Prostate cancer (PCa), which is among the most prevalent types of cancer in men, is a prominent topic in imaging research. The primary aim of PCa imaging is to acquire more accurate characterizations of the disease. More precise imaging of the local stage progression, early discovery of metastatic cancers, reliable diagnosis of oligometastatic cancer, and optimum treatment response evaluation are areas in which contemporary imaging is quickly improving and developing. Imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the whole body and molecular imaging with combined positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and MRI, enable imaging to support and enhance treatment lines in patients with local and advanced PCa. With the availability of multiple imaging modalities for the management of PCa, we aim in this review to offer a multidisciplinary viewpoint on the appropriate function of contemporary imaging in the identification of PCa.